This paper examines evidence-based interventions for children with primary language impairments, commonly referred to as specific language impairment (SLI). Beginning with the neurological underpinnings of language development — including synaptic pruning, hemispheric lateralization, and gender differences in brain organization — the paper reviews how oral language deficits translate into reading and writing difficulties. Drawing on research by Schuele and colleagues, Snowling and Hulme, and others, the paper surveys recommended interventions across developmental stages, from pre-preschool through early primary school. It concludes with a review of neuroimaging research linking infant brain structure to later language performance, reinforcing the importance of early, orally grounded intervention strategies.
The paper uses a synthesis approach, weaving together multiple peer-reviewed sources to build a cumulative argument rather than summarizing each source in isolation. For example, it connects Sousa's neurological framework to Schuele's classroom recommendations and then to Snowling's intervention outcomes, showing how each layer of evidence supports the next. This technique demonstrates graduate-level source integration.
The paper opens with a brief framing introduction, then establishes neurological context across two substantive sections on brain development and language disorders. A central developmental-stages section covers the bulk of the intervention evidence (pre-preschool through early primary school). A focused research article review follows, analyzing a specific neuroimaging study in depth. The paper closes with a concise conclusion that synthesizes the oral-language-first principle across all prior sections.
So strong is the genetic impulse driving language acquisition that all children will learn to speak some form of language (Sousa, 2011, p. 28, 196). This fact suggests that the remaining question confronting children, parents, educators, and society is how well these skills are learned. Problems encountered along the way can sometimes have a significant impact on a child's ability to communicate with others, both in childhood and into adulthood. The greatest challenges are those faced by children with speech and language disorders. To better understand the language problems confronting otherwise developmentally normal children, the recommended interventions — especially from an educator's point of view — will be examined and discussed in this paper.
Comprehending how a speech or language disorder in a child could develop and impact academic performance requires a basic understanding of how the brain develops and functions. When born, a child typically has as many neurons as they will ever have, with each forming an average of 2,500 connections (synapses) with other neurons (Woolfolk, 2010, p. 29–31). Over the next couple of years, the number of connections increases to approximately 15,000 per neuron in preparation for experience-based pruning. The formation of these connections is genetically driven in anticipation of functional need, and those connections that are behaviorally reinforced survive into adulthood. All other synapses are destroyed, or "pruned." This process has been called experience-expectant development because it anticipates need. The anatomical locations in the brain responsible for speech are one example of this process.
Synaptic connections can also be formed through experience, but the areas of the brain where this occurs tend to be more localized (Woolfolk, 2010, p. 30–31). These experience-dependent synaptic connections form in response to cognitive need, such as the need to learn to read. Compared to speech, which appears to be driven primarily by genetics, reading presents unique challenges to many children because it depends on both experience-expectant and experience-dependent processes (Sousa, 2011, p. 192–193). This understanding of early brain development is important because a less stimulating environment will cause a child's brain to lose important anatomical resources that cannot be easily reclaimed.
The brain of a young child, although close in size to an adult brain and rich with synaptic connections, is relatively unspecialized (Woolfolk, 2010, p. 30–31). As a child develops into an adult, the degree of specialization increases, with one hemisphere handling most of the cognitive workload for specific tasks. Among the tasks that become lateralized are speech production and speech-context comprehension, with the former located in the left hemisphere and the latter in the right hemisphere in most people (Sousa, 2011, p. 179). There are exceptions to this lateralization, including among some left-handed individuals (Woolfolk, 2010, p. 30–31). The brains of girls also tend to be less lateralized than those of boys, although the left hemisphere remains speech dominant for most girls (Sousa, 2011, p. 182, 186). The density of synaptic connections is higher in the left-hemisphere speech centers of girls, who tend to be more proficient language learners than boys. This difference may have significant implications in academic environments that emphasize verbal rather than visual instruction.
Primary language impairment in children is not uncommon, with an estimated 7% of preschool and early primary school children affected (Schuele, Spencer, Barako-Arndt, & Guillot, 2007). Primary language impairment can be distinguished from secondary impairment in that children with primary language impairment are otherwise developmentally normal. Secondary language impairments are caused by organic conditions, disorders, disease, or physical trauma. Primary language impairment has been termed specific language impairment (SLI), although Schuele and colleagues (2007) prefer the abbreviated term LI in their review of the research literature.
Schuele and colleagues (2007) reviewed the research literature examining language deficiencies associated with SLI as a way to introduce recommended interventions, focusing primarily on the association between speech impairments and reading and writing difficulties. Researchers have found that nearly 90% of children with SLI could be classified as disabled in terms of word coding and reading comprehension. Of the remaining 10%, fewer than 15% scored above the 50th percentile on reading measures. By comparison, writing impairments have received relatively little research attention, but Schuele and colleagues (2007) suggest that spelling, punctuation, and grammar would likely also be impaired in children with oral SLI.
Schuele and colleagues (2007) reviewed the five domains of literacy instruction in the United States: phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and reading comprehension. When children with impairment in one or more of these domains arrive in the classroom, they should be understood as having a developmental impairment. Accordingly, Schuele and colleagues recommend using interventions that are developmentally driven rather than age driven. In essence, parents and educators should rely more heavily on scaffolding for a child with SLI, treating the child as though constantly operating within Vygotsky's zone of proximal development (Woolfolk, 2010, p. 47). The overall goal is to minimize the developmental language gaps between the child and language-typical peers.
You’re 40% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.