Costume Design in Exodus: Gods and Kings (2014)
This paper reviews the costume design of Ridley Scott's 2014 film Exodus: Gods and Kings, focusing on the work of designer Janty Yates. It examines how Yates balanced historical evidence — including Egyptian lamellar armor, hieroglyphic imagery, and extant pharaonic statues — with the dramatic demands of the script. The review analyzes how costume choices communicate character status and ethnicity, particularly the visual contrast between the elaborately adorned Egyptians and the humbly dressed Israelites, as well as the symbolic significance of Moses's retained breastplate. The tension between historical accuracy and cinematic storytelling is a central concern throughout.
- Introduction: The Challenge of Biblical Costume Design: Context and difficulty of recreating Biblical-era costumes
- Egyptian Costumes and the Portrayal of Pharaoh: Gold armor, lamellar design, and Pharaoh's vanity
- Moses, the Israelites, and Visual Contrast: Humble Israelite dress versus Moses's retained armor
- Historical Accuracy Versus Dramatic Necessity: Limits of accuracy and demands of cinematic storytelling
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds its analysis in a primary source — a direct interview with the costume designer — giving the review credibility beyond surface-level observation.
- Balances two competing frameworks throughout: historical fidelity to ancient Egyptian dress and the pragmatic needs of filmmaking and character differentiation.
- Uses specific costume details (gold armor, burlap robes, Moses's breastplate) as evidence for broader claims about character and narrative function.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates artifact analysis — treating costume as a primary text that encodes meaning about character, status, ethnicity, and power. Rather than simply describing what characters wear, the review consistently asks what those choices signify within the story and how they relate to both historical record and audience expectation.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by establishing the unique challenge of recreating Biblical-era costumes for a mass audience with preexisting expectations. It then moves through specific costume choices for the Egyptians and Pharaoh, followed by a discussion of Moses and the Israelites, and concludes by interrogating the limits of historical accuracy in a Hollywood production. The argument flows logically from context, to evidence, to critical evaluation.
Introduction: The Challenge of Biblical Costume Design
It is always challenging to recreate the historical costumes of a past era; it is even more so when that era carries Biblical significance. Audiences arrive with strong, established ideas of how characters "should" look, shaped by personal beliefs and the numerous previous depictions of the period. Recreating images that have become iconic in earlier films — as well as in ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics — was the daunting task facing the costume designer of Exodus: Gods and Kings, the 2014 release that details the story of Moses and his attempt to free the Israelites from slavery in Egypt.
The costume designer Janty Yates, in an interview with the L.A. Times, noted that he was able to draw upon actual historical depictions of what individuals wore during this era. For example, "all the Egyptians [in the film] wear lamellar armor, which has this petal-shaped metal that's even more elaborate than chain mail" (Rottenberg 2014). Of the historical Ramses, Yates observed: "He was so vain, he had 70-foot statues built of himself — and not just one or two, like 40 or 50" (Rottenberg 2014). This research grounded the design process in genuine historical sources, even as dramatic considerations shaped the final results.
Egyptian Costumes and the Portrayal of Pharaoh
The designer noted that Pharaoh's armor is gold not only to indicate his status but also his vanity. The gold armor, with its pristine appearance, is intended to highlight the character of the Pharaoh rather than simply recreate the past with strict historical accuracy. The extant statues of Pharaoh provided a guide for the designers but were blended with the dramatic needs posed by the script.
Many of the film's scenes appear to have been inspired by hieroglyphic imagery in terms of their visual layout, with elements reminiscent of earlier Hollywood epics such as The Ten Commandments and Ben-Hur. All of the Egyptians are dressed in elaborate metalwork throughout the film in a manner that conveys wealth, coldness, and superior status. The overall visual language of the Egyptian court is one of ornate, imposing grandeur.
Moses, the Israelites, and Visual Contrast
In contrast to the Egyptians, the Israelites are dressed far more humbly in what appear to be roughly woven robes and burlap. Moses, however, retains an elaborate breastplate when he fights, given that he was raised within the royal family and still possesses the armor he once wore. According to the interview with the costume designer, this detail conveys his special status and his history as a soldier of the palace, even as he leads an army of enslaved people (Rottenberg 2014).
There also needs to be a clear visual contrast between Moses and Ramses — a distinction that is both ethnic and personal. The story centers on two men locked in a struggle for power, and their personal animosity makes the visual differentiation between the two characters especially crucial. Costume design in this context functions as a form of visual storytelling, communicating character history and conflict at a glance.
References
Rottenberg, J. (2014). For Exodus, Janty Yates dresses Pharaoh, Moses. L.A. Times.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.