Faith and Reason in Christian Theology: Models Explained
This paper examines the relationship between faith and reason in the Christian tradition, arguing that while faith typically rests upon reason, it can be reached through multiple pathways. Drawing on Thomas Aquinas, Anselm's ontological argument, and scriptural examples including St. Paul, Mary Magdalene, the Apostles, and Nicodemus, the paper demonstrates that conversion and belief arise through diverse means—personal revelation, miracles, rational persuasion, and intuitive encounter with the divine. The paper then surveys Avery Dulles's seven models of faith—propositional, transcendental, fiducial, experiential, obediential, praxis, and personalist—to show how each model reflects a different interplay of reason, emotion, and grace in the journey to faith.
- Introduction: Thesis: faith rests on reason but has multiple pathways
- Defining Faith and Reason: Scholastic definitions of faith and rational assent
- Scripture and Personal Revelation: Paul, Mary Magdalene, and Apostles as non-rational conversions
- Miracles, Words, and Prophecies: Nicodemus and reason leading to the threshold of faith
- Alternative Models of How Faith and Reason Relate: Dulles's seven models surveyed and applied
- Conclusion: Faith must be expressed in action and communicated
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Anchors abstract theological arguments in concrete scriptural examples (St. Paul, Mary Magdalene, Nicodemus, the Apostles), making the reasoning accessible and grounded.
- Maintains a clear thesis throughout: faith typically rests on reason but can be reached through multiple pathways, and each pathway is illustrated with a distinct example.
- Integrates primary sources (Scripture) with secondary theological authorities (Aquinas, Dulles, Sheen) to balance textual evidence with doctrinal interpretation.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses a typological framework—Dulles's seven models of faith—as an organizational scaffold. Each model is introduced, briefly defined, and then mapped onto a scriptural or historical figure already discussed earlier in the essay. This technique allows the writer to synthesize prior analysis rather than repeat it, demonstrating economy of argument and the ability to apply a theoretical framework to concrete cases.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with definitions of faith and reason, establishing the scholastic position that faith rests on reason. A Scripture-focused middle section then complicates this claim with counter-examples of non-rational conversion. The paper pivots to Dulles's seven models to reconcile these tensions, showing that multiple pathways to faith are theologically recognized. The conclusion draws the threads together, asserting that reason ultimately plays some role in every model, even when it is not the primary vehicle for conversion.
Introduction
Faith starts in the mind and moves to the will. Thomas Aquinas is one of the most well-known scholastics to make that argument. The mind must consent to the truths of the faith, and the heart and mind must then act in unison to bear that faith out in one's life. This is why the scholastics argued that faith rested on reason—for people are rational beings who need reasons to "buy into" an idea. Anselm's ontological argument, for example, used reason to prove God's existence. However, as others and Scripture show, faith can also be obtained through deep intuition and feeling. This paper will explain how, although faith typically depends on the use of reason, faith can be reached in a variety of ways; and in some cases, false reasoning can even be used to destroy faith.
Defining Faith and Reason
Hebrews 11:1 states that faith is the substance of one's hope in God—it is what allows one to see without seeing. However, God gave evidence to people to convince them of His divinity: testimony, Scripture, miracles, teachings—all of these served to bring people to faith. In other words, God appealed to people's reason. Thus, the Christian faith is generally based on the application of one's reason to the revelations and teachings of the Christian Church in a process of discernment to determine whether the claims of the Church are credible. This is why the scholastics hold that faith is based on reason. Faith is trust in God—and it is independent of all else. Faith does not need reason; it simply rests on reason. Of course, it can rest on other things as well, as Avery Dulles shows in his seven models of faith, which shall be described later in this essay.
Reason can be defined as the assent of the mind to the facts laid before it. In terms of its relation to faith, the use of reason can be described as the process of the mind consenting to the truths that the Church teaches. This is commonly required before an act of faith can be made or before faith can be professed. Faith is therefore, typically, the outcome of a rational assent of the mind to the facts laid before it, which teach, namely, that: 1) Jesus Christ is the Son of God; 2) He died on the Cross in reparation for the sins of the world; 3) His sacrifice atoned for the sins of mankind and opened the gates of Heaven, which had been barred since the fall of Adam and Eve. The Christian faith encompasses other teachings and doctrines as well, but these are the preeminent points that have a historical basis. 1 Peter 3:15 tells us to always be mindful of the reasons we have for such hope—such faith. We are not to forget them, because people will want to know. People will see the joy, peace, and hope in the heart of a Christian and they will not ask, "What feeling gave you this hope?" Rather, they will ask, "What reason do you have for this hope?" Reason is what drives people to act deliberately and with consideration.
However, God does not always appeal to one's reason to bring a person to faith. In the story of St. Paul, for example, before his conversion Saul is persecuting Christians (Acts 8:3). Saul would not listen to reason because he had built up a wall of hatred around his heart and mind and would not let God's proofs reach him. Thus, to reach Saul, God used a blinding flash of light and literally knocked him off his horse. This experience had nothing to do with the use of reason—it was a visceral experience, a shock to the system that set Saul on his way to conversion and to the Christian faith. Reason was applied before long, of course, but in the beginning Saul had to have his inner being shaken and put in the right disposition. Saul required a dose of humility. Thus, while faith may be said to rest upon reason, it could also be said that reason rests upon humility.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.