Family Motivation and College Students With Learning Disabilities
This paper examines the impact of family motivation on college-age students with learning disabilities, drawing on Family Systems Theory and Family Stress and Coping Theory to frame its analysis. It reviews how these developmental theories from Family Science help identify each family member's role in supporting academic success, and how coping strategies — ranging from clear family boundaries to positive feedback loops — can be structured to address conditions such as dyslexia and AD/HD. The paper also explores family resilience, discussing how families facing compounding stressors can either strengthen or collapse depending on the resources, perceptions, and collaborative relationships they develop with educators and counselors.
- Introduction: Family motivation as key factor in student success
- Literature Review: Family Science Foundations: Family Science theories applied to student outcomes
- Family Systems Theory: Systems thinking, strategies, and positive feedback
- Family Stress and Coping Theory: Stress adaptation, perception, and coping strategies
- Family Resilience and Compounding Stressors: Multiple stressors and family strength or collapse
- Conclusion: Family support essential for academic achievement
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its argument in two distinct but complementary theoretical frameworks — Family Systems Theory and Family Stress and Coping Theory — and clearly explains how each applies to the specific population of college-age students with learning disabilities.
- Concrete examples, such as the autopilot analogy for positive feedback and the step-by-step dyslexia coping model, translate abstract theory into practical, classroom-relevant guidance.
- The paper integrates multiple cited sources across disciplines (nursing, education, adolescent psychology) to support its interdisciplinary argument without allowing any single source to dominate.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective applied theory synthesis: it does not merely describe Family Systems and Family Stress Theories in the abstract but consistently returns each theoretical concept to its practical implications for students with learning disabilities and their families. This "theory-to-practice" move is signaled throughout by transitional phrases that explicitly connect framework to application.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an introduction establishing the problem and its significance, followed by a literature review situating the two core theories within Family Science. Each theory then receives its own dedicated section with supporting strategies and examples. A section on family resilience addresses compounding stressors before the conclusion synthesizes the paper's key claims and reaffirms the importance of family-centered interventions for college students with learning disabilities.
Introduction
The impact of family motivation on college-age students with learning disabilities may be a deciding factor in a student's success or failure. College-age students with learning disabilities clearly have more immediate needs in cooperative learning settings compared to typical students. Educators cannot simply instruct such a student to sit down and read five chapters of Freud. These students may contend with conditions like dyslexia, AD/HD, or limited English proficiency, and they may have received additional support in the past that is no longer available at an older age. When underlying issues are present, the family, teachers, and students themselves must work more closely together to reach positive outcomes. As Cranton notes, "Teaching effectiveness is inferred from the product that was created; it is the product that is the indicator of scholarship."
This paper aims to provide general background information about the application of Family Theories. The underlying objective is to understand the implications of Family Theories as they pertain to college-age students with learning disabilities, and how these principles can be used to establish programs that help assess and address a student's problem areas. This type of work offers opportunities to evaluate both external rewards from family and other resources, as well as the intrinsic rewards a student draws from within. There is little doubt that having a specific learning disability can surface related personal anxieties and lead to reactions that family and teachers may not understand. As a result, students often experience a full spectrum of emotions in their academic environments.
Literature Review: Family Science Foundations
Family Stress Theory and Family Systems Theory are both developmental theories drawn from the broader field of Family Science. Family Science investigates why some family units are able to adapt and grow even when facing numerous situational stressors and transitional events, while other families face far fewer stressors yet completely break down under the pressure. These theories offer methodologies for measuring and interpreting why families experiencing hardship develop unique ways of coping — through newly discovered strength or enhanced capabilities — in ways that support the development of individual members.
In the context of college-age students with learning disabilities, these theories help define each family member's role in supporting the student's success. Whether the family is nuclear, extended, or another configuration, it is critical to identify the primary caregiver within the family system in order to understand where corrective actions can be taken and questions addressed. Environment within the family system is "viewed as an open system and a component of the larger community and society, with the assumption that families benefit from and contribute to the network of relationships and resources in the community" (McCubbin). Regardless of who the primary caregiver is — biological parents, grandparents, or another significant person — college-age students with learning disabilities can achieve and excel in their learning environment.
"The range and depth of the family's repertoire of coping and problem-solving strategies when employed to manage a crisis situation are related to the level of family adaptation, and this is a positive relationship" (McCubbin). Understanding the patterns demonstrated at both the individual and family level is a key application of these theories. By identifying outcomes, it is possible to determine where established patterns break down — at the individual level, the family level, or both — so that a student's resilience can be assessed through observable responses or behaviors.
Works Cited
Clark, Diana Brewster. (1990). Dyslexia: Theory & Practice of Remedial Instruction. Parkton, MD: York Press.
Coutinho, M. J., Oswald, D. P., & Best, A. M. (2002). "The Influence of Sociodemographics and Gender on the Disproportionate Identification of Minority Students as Having Learning Disabilities." Remedial and Special Education, 23, 49–59. doi: 10.1177/074193250202300107.
Cranton, Patricia A. (2000). "Exploring the Scholarship of Teaching." Journal of Higher Education. July 1.
Elksnin, L. K., & Elksnin, N. (2004). "The Social-Emotional Side of Learning Disabilities." Learning Disability Quarterly, 27(1), 3–8.
Field, S., Sarver, M. D., & Shaw, S. F. (2003). "Self-Determination: A Key to Success in Postsecondary Education for Students with Learning Disabilities." Remedial and Special Education, 24, 339–349. doi: 10.1177/07419325030240060501.
McCubbin, M. A. (1993). "Family Stress Theory and the Development of Nursing Knowledge About Family Adaptation." In Feetham, S. L.; Meister, S. B.; Bell, J. M.; & Gillis, C. L. (Eds.), The Nursing of Families. Newbury Park: Sage. 46–58.
Papini, D. R., Farmer, F. F., Clark, S. M., Micka, J. C., & Barnett, J. K. (1990). "Early Adolescent Age and Gender Differences in Patterns of Emotional Self-Disclosure to Parents and Friends." Adolescence, 25, 959–976.
Patterson, J. M. (1995). "Promoting Resilience in Families Experiencing Stress." Pediatric Clinics of North America, 42(1), February.
Plunkett, Scott W., Carolyn S. Henry, & Patricia K. Knaub. (1999). "Family Stressor Events, Family Coping and Adolescent Adaptation in Farm and Ranch Families." Adolescence, Vol. 34.
Trainin, G., & Swanson, L. H. (2005). "Cognition, Metacognition and Achievement of College Students with Learning Disabilities." Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(4), 261–272.
Wells, T., Sandefur, G., & Hogan, D. (2003). "What Happens After the High School Years Among Young Persons With Disabilities?" Social Forces, 82(2), 803–832.
Woods, James E. (1995). The Dyslexic's Guide to Academic Achievement. New York: Semco Books, Inc.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.