This literature review examines family violence within Indigenous Australian communities, a persistent concern despite intensive government scrutiny and public awareness. The paper surveys key risk factors—including socioeconomic disadvantage, alcohol misuse, misinterpretation of customary law, and the intergenerational effects of colonization—and discusses their disproportionate impact on Indigenous women and children. It critiques previous intervention approaches grounded in liberal feminist frameworks that have repeatedly failed by overlooking Indigenous cultural and historical perspectives. Drawing on social learning theory and empowerment-based models, the review proposes a holistic, context-sensitive primary prevention framework that prioritizes community ownership and addresses structural inequalities. Gaps in existing literature, including the underrepresentation of male victims and widespread underreporting, are also identified.
The paper exemplifies critical synthesis: rather than simply summarizing sources, it evaluates them against one another and identifies where the dominant intervention approach (liberal feminism) has failed. This technique—comparing frameworks and exposing their limitations—is central to effective graduate-level literature reviews and demonstrates that the writer can engage critically with, rather than merely report, existing scholarship.
The review opens with a problem statement that defines terms and frames the argument. It then surveys risk factors and the impact on children before critiquing past policy failures. Two substantive sections contextualize Indigenous family violence culturally and historically, and propose a community-empowerment prevention model. A limitations section acknowledges research gaps, and a rationale section justifies the proposed framework before the conclusion synthesizes all threads. This eight-section structure is well-suited to a graduate-level literature review requiring both analytical depth and policy relevance.
The issue of family violence is one of the key concerns impacting negatively on Indigenous communities of Australia. This review surveys available literature on the issue, identifying factors contributing to it, outlining a framework for understanding why the problem has continued to persist despite intensive government scrutiny and a high level of public awareness, and identifying the key gaps in existing knowledge. Intervention policies have time and time again been developed on the basis of a liberal feminist approach that overlooks Indigenous communities' perspectives on the concept of family violence — and, as expected, those policies have repeatedly failed (Campion et al., 2007). This review draws from that basis and highlights the importance of adopting a context-based primary prevention framework that focuses on solutions rather than on the quantitative cause-and-effect dimensions of the issue.
The term Indigenous family violence describes the range of violent acts occurring in Indigenous communities, including economic, psychological, cultural, spiritual, social, sexual, emotional, and physical abuses perpetrated within community relationships, kinship networks, and extended families (Cripps & Davis, 2012). Although the specific rates of reported family violence vary across studies, all evidence points to higher rates of violence among Indigenous communities (AHRC, 2003; Bryant & Willis, 2008; Taylor et al., 2004; Alford & Croucher, 2011; Western Australia State Government, 2002).
A survey by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) found that 13.3 out of every 1,000 Indigenous people admitted to hospital were subjects of assault, compared to just 1 out of every 1,000 for the non-Indigenous group (AHRC, 2003). According to the data, Indigenous people are victimized at a rate at least two times higher than that of non-Indigenous people. A 2006 report by Carrington and Phillips to the Parliament of Australia places the rate of violent victimization of Indigenous women at 40 times that of their non-Indigenous counterparts. Disturbingly, despite their small numbers, Indigenous people make up almost a quarter of the prison population, 20% of persons convicted of sexual assault, and more than 40% of persons convicted for acts intended to cause harm or injury (Bryant & Willis, 2008).
Bryant and Willis (2008) integrate the findings of a number of studies and surveys and conclude that Indigenous children, when compared to their non-Indigenous counterparts, are four times more likely to "be the subject of a substantiated child protection notification of abuse or neglect" (p. vii). However, this is not the only concern: there have been numerous reports of violence emerging in adolescence among Indigenous people — a trend that researchers have linked to observational learning, whereby children imitate violent behavior from parents or aggressors within the community and carry it through the intermediate stages of development into adulthood due to a lack of emotional and social guidance (VicHealth, 2007; Kowanko et al., 2009; Indigenous Family Violence Prevention Forum, 2009). Traditional institutions originally meant to instill responsibility in youths and teenagers, and to prepare them socially and emotionally for the challenges of adulthood, have gradually lost their significance. Accordingly, there is a pressing need to intervene early to reduce Indigenous children's exposure to family violence and to redirect their developmental pathways so as to prevent a generational carry-over of violent behavior.
According to the Victoria State Government (2010), misinterpretation of customary law has contributed significantly to family violence among Indigenous people. Bartels (2010) further attributes family violence among Indigenous communities to a confluence of risk factors relating to social and economic disadvantage, including availability of financial resources, community and family functionality, the social stressors of living in a remote environment, and alcohol and substance abuse. Morgan and Chadwick's (2009) view mirrors this: Indigenous persons have a significantly high likelihood of being victims of threats or violence if they have financial difficulties, have experienced a high number of recent stressors, have some form of disability, have been separated from their family, or are young.
Bryant and Willis (2008) adopt a similar view but go further, subdividing the prominent risk factors into three major categories: socio-demographic variables (gender and age of victim); measures of community, family, and individual functionality (drug use, stressors, and contact with the justice system); and resources available to the victim (housing mobility, level of remoteness, unemployment, and educational and material resources). Multivariate analysis revealed a positive correlation between violent behavior and variables related to functionality and resource availability. The study further established that Indigenous females are victimized at a higher rate than Indigenous males, and that "young people in their mid-teens and mid-twenties, irrespective of their ethnicity, face a higher risk of violent victimization" (Bryant & Willis, 2008, p. vii). The age-linked victimization patterns for Indigenous groups closely resemble those of non-Indigenous communities, but are shifted slightly toward younger ages due to the group's lower age profile, which is attributable to poor health outcomes (Ypinazar et al., 2007; Wundersitz, 2010; Perkins et al., 1994).
Alcohol is put forth as a major contributor to family violence and victimization. According to Bryant and Willis (2008), the probability of an Indigenous person being subject to assault increases with increasing alcohol risk behavior — they place the figures at 23% for persons with low-risk alcohol consumption and 42% for those with high-risk alcohol behavior. These findings mirror those of Richards (2011), who found that almost 70% of Indigenous homicides occur in situations where both the offender and victim are drinking. Cripps (2006), however, cautions against singling out any one factor as the cause of Indigenous family violence, and instead proposes a structural framework in which all factors interplay on equal footing to give rise to family violence.
Family violence among Indigenous Australian communities has been a key concern for the Australian government year after year. The persistence of the issue has often been attributed to the lack of a coordinated, holistic primary intervention approach. Policy makers have repeatedly relied on a liberal feminist framework that overlooks the perspectives and the cultural and historical contexts of Indigenous communities. The existing body of literature focuses predominantly on the quantitative causal relationships between Indigenous violent behavior and established risk factors. Scholars and researchers, however, concur that attention must shift from the quantitative front toward developing sustainable solutions. This literature review presents a holistic scope of the issue of Indigenous family violence and proposes a culturally grounded, community-empowered approach to addressing it.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner. (2006). Ending family violence and abuse in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities. Australian Human Rights Commission. Retrieved from
AHRC. (2003). Social justice report 2003. The Australian Human Rights Commission. Retrieved from
Alford, A., & Croucher, R. (2011). The ALRC and Indigenous people — continuing the conversation. The Australian Law Reform Commission. Retrieved from
Australian Institute of Criminology. (2008). Australian crime and violence prevention awards. Retrieved from
Bartels, L. (2010). Emerging issues in domestic/family violence research. Criminology Research Council. Retrieved from
Berry, S., & Crowe, T. P. (2009). A review of engagement of Indigenous Australians within mental health and substance abuse services. e-Journal for the Advancement of Mental Health, 8(1), 1–12.
Bromfield, L., Lamont, A., Parker, R., & Horsfall, B. (2010). Issues for the safety and well-being of children in families with multiple and complex problems: The co-occurrence of domestic violence, parental substance misuse, and mental health problems. Australian Institute of Family Studies. No. 33. Retrieved from
Bryant, C., & Willis, M. (2008). Risk factors in Indigenous violent victimization. Australian Institute of Criminology. Technical and Background Paper No. 30. Retrieved from
Campion, J., Hunter, E., & Skalicky, J. (2007). Improving mental health skills of health workers in Indigenous communities in Northern Queensland. Aboriginal and Islander Health Worker Journal, 31(8), 12–15.
Carmody, M. (2009). Conceptualising the prevention of sexual assault and the role of education. Australian Institute of Family Studies. Issue No. 10. Retrieved from
Carrington, K., & Phillips, J. (2003). Domestic violence in Australia: An overview of the issues. Parliament of Australia Library. Retrieved from http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/Publications_Archive/archive/Domviolence
Clough, A. R., Cairney, S., D'Abbs, P., Parker, R., Maruff, P., Gray, D., & O'Reilly, B. (2004). Measuring exposure to cannabis use and other substance use in remote Indigenous populations in Northern Australia: Evaluation of a 'community epidemiology' approach using proxy respondents. Addiction Research & Theory, 12, 261–274.
Cripps, K. (2010). Indigenous family violence: Pathways forward. In P. Dudgeon & R. Walker (Eds.), Indigenous mental health (pp. 145–154). Australian Council for Education Research.
Cripps, K., & Davis, M. (2012). Communities working to reduce Indigenous family violence. The Indigenous Justice Clearinghouse. Retrieved from
Dudgeon, P., Wright, M., Paradies, Y., Garvey, D., & Walker, I. (2007). The social, cultural, and historical context of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians. In P. Dudgeon & R. Walker (Eds.), Indigenous mental health (pp. 25–42). Australian Council for Education Research.
Government of Western Australia. (2002). Putting people first: The Western Australian State Government's action plan for addressing family violence and child abuse in Aboriginal communities. Retrieved from
Hunter, E. (2007). Disadvantage and discontent: A review of issues relevant to the mental health of rural and remote Indigenous Australians. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 15(2), 88–93.
Indigenous Family Violence Prevention Forum. (2009). Family violence. The Annual Indigenous Family Violence Prevention Forum. Retrieved from
Kowanko, I., Stewart, T., Power, C., Fraser, R., Love, I., & Bromley, T. (2009). An Aboriginal family and community healing program in metropolitan Adelaide: Description and evaluation. Australian Indigenous Health Bulletin, 9(4). Retrieved from http://healthbulletin.org.au/articles/an-aboriginal-family-and-community-healing-program-in-metropolitan-adelaide-description-and-evaluation/
Ley, D., Young, L., Baker, P., Hunter, K., Hunter, E., & Hannah, D. (2007). Perceptions of mental health service delivery by staff and Indigenous consumers: It's still about communication. Australasian Psychiatry, 15(2), 130–134.
Morgan, A., & Chadwick, H. (2009). Key issues in domestic violence. Australian Institute of Criminology. Summary Paper No. 7. Retrieved from
Mulroney, J. (2003). Australian domestic and family violence. Australian Domestic and Family Violence Clearinghouse. Retrieved from
Perkins, J. J., Samson-Fisher, R. J., Blunden, S., Lunnay, D., Redman, S., & Hensely, M. J. (1994). The prevalence of drug use in urban Aboriginal communities. Addiction, 89(1), 1319–1331.
Richards, K. (2011). Children's exposure to domestic violence in Australia: Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice. Australian Institute of Criminology. Paper No. 419. Retrieved from
Taylor, J., Cheers, B., Weetra, C., & Gentle, I. (2004). Supporting community solutions to family violence. Australian Social Work, 57(1), 71–83.
Tsey, K., Wilson, A., Haswell-Elkins, M., Whiteside, M., McCalman, J., Cadet-James, Y., & Wenitong, M. (2007). Empowerment-based research methods: A 10-year approach to enhancing Indigenous social and emotional wellbeing. Australasian Psychiatry, 15(S1), S34–S38.
VicHealth. (2007). Preventing violence before it occurs: A framework and background paper to guide the primary prevention of violence against women in Victoria. Victorian Health Promotion Association.
VicHealth. (2010). National survey on community attitudes to violence against women 2009: Changing cultures, changing attitudes — preventing violence against women: A summary of findings. Victorian Health Promotion Foundation.
VicHealth. (2011). The Gippsland community walk against family violence: Evaluation report. Victoria State Government. Retrieved from
Willis, M. (2010). Community safety in Australian Indigenous communities: Service providers' perceptions. Australian Institute of Criminology Reports: Research and Public Policy Series 110.
Willis, M. (2011). Non-disclosure of violence in Australian Indigenous communities. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice. Australian Institute of Criminology Reports. No. 405.
Willis, M., & Moore, J. P. (2008). Reintegration of Indigenous prisoners. Australian Institute of Criminology Reports Research and Public Policy Series. No. 90.
Willis, M. (2008). Reintegration of Indigenous prisoners: Key findings. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice. Australian Institute of Criminology Reports. No. 364.
Wundersitz, J. (2010). Indigenous perpetrators of violence: Prevalence and risk factors for reoffending. Australian Institute of Criminology Reports: Research and Public Policy Series 105. Retrieved from
Ypinazar, V., Margolis, S., Haswell-Elkins, M. R., & Tsey, K. (2007). Indigenous Australians' understandings regarding mental health and disorders: A meta-synthesis of the literature. Australia–New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 41(6), 467–478.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.