This paper investigates the relationship between Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and gender inequality in developing nations, with particular emphasis on Uganda. It surveys three theoretical pathways through which FDI may affect gender outcomes — overall economic symmetry, technological spillovers, and corporate social responsibility — and reviews empirical evidence on wage gaps and labor force participation. Drawing on indices such as the Gender Inequality Index (GII) and the Gender Development Index (GDI), the paper argues that existing research on sub-Saharan Africa largely overlooks Uganda specifically. It calls for a more comprehensive, multi-parameter approach to measuring FDI's influence on female well-being, education, and economic empowerment in the region.
In emerging nations, the female population encounters countless restrictions on a daily basis. Even in the education sector, the rate of girls pursuing their learning is substantially lower than that of their male counterparts. Few females enroll in learning institutions, a situation reinforced by caregivers who prefer investing in their male children's education. Beyond biases in education, females in these regions are rendered vulnerable to harmful behaviors. In certain parts of developing states, women's voices remain unheard in civil matters, and it is widely considered natural for females to be more involved in household management than males. Women are also significantly underrepresented in the workforce (United Nations, 2015; Goel, 2016). Those who are employed frequently encounter persistent biases regarding their pay and working conditions. In order for developing states to progress economically and socially, it is imperative to curb gender inequality and establish empowerment frameworks for women's well-being, education, and advancement — steps that would have a positive impact on entire nations (Björkman Nyqvist and Jayachandran, 2017; Lund, 2018).
Disparities arising from gender attract the attention of global institutions, policymakers, and scholars due to their far-reaching societal consequences. According to Christine Lagarde, former IMF Managing Director, "of the entire worldwide female population, only 55% participate in the workforce, whereas 80% of males do. Women are paid 50% less than their male counterparts for similar work, while in the world of politics, women account for only 20% of lawmakers worldwide" (Lagarde, 2016). Several initiatives have been implemented to address these disparities. These include EDGE (Evidence and Data for Gender Equality), developed by the United Nations Statistics Division, as well as the Gender Budgeting dataset developed by the International Monetary Fund. Subsequent studies have further evaluated the capacity of women to lead and transform their communities (Kochhar, Jain-Chandra and Newiak, 2017; Stotsky et al., 2016; Dieterich, Huang and Thomas, 2016).
Whether Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) influences gender equality and either reduces or exacerbates disparities remains a contested question. On one hand, FDI may positively affect gender outcomes by empowering women through the creation of employment and earning opportunities, owing to the favorable operational practices of multinational enterprises (MNEs), and through the promotion of balance in corporate structures and trade relations (Bui, Vo and Bui, 2018; Anyanwu, 2016; Carr, 2016; Vahter and Masso, 2018). On the other hand, FDI has also been associated with creating employment insecurities for women. Furthermore, traditional beliefs and cultural norms can significantly influence how FDI is absorbed by a host nation.
Numerous scholarly reviews identify three key pathways through which FDI affects gender outcomes.
FDI can generate balanced supply and demand for goods across diverse economic sectors, both locally and regionally, thereby increasing a nation's overall income. The availability of diverse economic resources enhances the well-being of citizens, including women, and helps reduce gender-based biases (Blanton and Blanton, 2015; McLaren and Yoo, 2017). The growth of diverse industries creates employment opportunities for women and can direct investment into sectors that specifically utilize female labor, generating concrete demand for female workers. The Heckscher–Ohlin model provides a theoretical foundation for this phenomenon (Ouedraogo and Marlet, 2018). A key distinction between industrialized and underdeveloped nations is that industrialized countries tend to rely on capital-intensive and technically advanced industries, whereas underdeveloped ones depend more heavily on labor-intensive industries with lower wage systems. This dynamic can impede women's progress in underdeveloped nations, as women are more likely to occupy low-wage positions. However, modern institutions increasingly find it difficult to sustain gender biases in the face of global advocacy campaigns that have empowered individuals to seek legal redress, resulting in significant penalties for organizations found guilty of discrimination.
The integration of MNEs with domestic industries facilitates technological advancement in host-country firms. Indigenous industries must keep pace with evolving standards, which can lead to the diffusion of technical skills (Nelson et al., 2015). This means local firms must continuously upgrade their workforce's skill levels. In such contexts, female workers may fall behind, as they tend to be concentrated in different economic sectors (Afshar, 2016; Latorre, 2016; Persson, 2016). However, in cases where MNEs deploy technologies that are accessible or favorable to female workers, this creates opportunities for women to be employed within those MNEs, thereby enhancing their labor competencies (Cornwall and Rivas, 2015).
In an effort to maintain their social standing amid scrutiny from consumers and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), MNEs implement CSR programs that demonstrate their commitment to promoting favorable and equitable workplace environments for all employees (Ouedraogo and Marlet, 2018; UNCTAD, 2014). Numerous studies have assessed how foreign corporations with significant local ownership tend to hire more women executives, maintain more equitable domestic operational environments, and exhibit smaller income gaps based on gender (Olcott and Oliver, 2014; Kodama, Javorcik and Abe, 2016). Such practices tend to ripple outward into domestic firms as well (UNCTAD, 2014; Carr, 2016).
"Mixed findings on wages and female employment participation"
"Gap in literature and Uganda-specific research rationale"
The GII incorporates the maternal mortality rate, adolescent birth rate, the level of gender-based tertiary education, the share of female and male lawmakers, and labor force participation rates for both sexes (UNCTAD, 2014). The GDI, by contrast, accounts for life expectancy by gender, expected and mean years of schooling, and average Gross National Income (GNI) per capita by gender (UNCTAD, 2014). Together, these two parameters enable a more detailed evaluation of women's overall well-being than the single-variable approaches used in most preceding studies.
Furthermore, both gender development and gender disparity form the core analytical frameworks of this research. Prior studies have tended to focus on individual indicators of gender progress, such as female school enrollment rates or wage gaps, resulting in a narrow evaluative scope. Omitting broader measures of gender development from studies of gender disparity leads to restricted conclusions. For example, if the wage gap narrows while the female enrollment rate remains stagnant, the overall effect of FDI on female advancement is ambiguous and cannot be assessed adequately.
This research is expansive in scope. It examines women's involvement in property ownership in relation to FDI alongside established parameters such as equal pay regulations, absence of employment discrimination, and accounting practices for both women and men. All of these factors influence the domestic labor market environment into which global firms enter. Conversely, these parameters can also shape the opportunities available to women to benefit economically from FDI. This study will evaluate these factors and assess the validity and magnitude of their influence.
By pioneering a comprehensive, Uganda-specific analysis of how existing gender frameworks mediate the relationship between FDI and gender development outcomes, this research contributes meaningfully to a literature that has thus far overlooked one of East Africa's most significant economies. The dual use of the GII and GDI as composite measures, rather than single proxy variables, represents a methodological advance that offers a fuller picture of how foreign investment shapes the lives of women in developing contexts.
Afshar, H. (Ed.). (2016). Women and empowerment: Illustrations from the Third World. Springer.
Anyanwu, J. C. (2016). Analysis of gender equality in youth employment in Africa. African Development Review, 28(4), 397–415.
Björkman Nyqvist, M., and Jayachandran, S. (2017). Mothers care more, but fathers decide: Educating parents about child health in Uganda. American Economic Review, 107(5), 496–500.
Blanton, R. G., and Blanton, S. L. (2015). Is foreign direct investment "gender blind"? Women's rights as a determinant of US FDI. Feminist Economics, 21(4), 61–88.
Bui, T. M. H., Vo, X. V., and Bui, D. T. (2018). Gender inequality and FDI: Empirical evidence from developing Asia–Pacific countries. Eurasian Economic Review, 1–24.
Carr, S. (2016). Investing in equality: A case for motivating gender empowerment through foreign direct investment (Doctoral dissertation).
Chen, Z., Ge, Y., Lai, H., and Wan, C. (2013). Globalization and gender wage inequality in China. World Development, 44, 256–266.
Cornwall, A., and Rivas, A. M. (2015). From 'gender equality' and 'women's empowerment' to global justice: Reclaiming a transformative agenda for gender and development. Third World Quarterly, 36(2), 396–415.
Dieterich, M. C., Huang, A., and Thomas, M. A. H. (2016). Women's opportunities and challenges in sub-Saharan African job markets. International Monetary Fund.
Goel, R. K. (2016). Foreign direct investment and entrepreneurship: Gender differences across the world. Asian Development Bank, Conference on Foreign Direct Investment, June 2016.
Jaffri, A. A., Sana, M., and Asjed, R. (2015). Impact of globalization on gender inequality in the labour market of Pakistan. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 53(1), 1.
Kochhar, K., Jain-Chandra, S., and Newiak, M. (2016). Women, work, and economic growth: Leveling the playing field. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.
Kodama, N., Javorcik, B. S., and Abe, Y. (2016). Transplanting corporate culture across international borders: FDI and female employment in Japan. Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI) Working Paper.
Lagarde, C. (2016). The business case for women's empowerment. IMF–APEC CEO Summit, Peru.
Latorre, M. C. (2016). A CGE analysis of the impact of foreign direct investment and tariff reform on female and male workers in Tanzania. World Development, 77, 346–366.
Lund, M. (2018). New era towards gender equality in Uganda? A case study in rural Lukonko on households' perceptions towards sending their girls and boys to primary school. School of Natural Sciences, Technology and Environmental Studies.
McLaren, J., and Yoo, M. (2017). FDI and inequality in Vietnam: An approach with census data. Journal of Asian Economics, 48, 134–147.
Nelson, J., Porth, M., Valikai, K., and McGee, H. (2015). A path to empowerment: The role of corporations in supporting women's economic progress. Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative at the Harvard Kennedy School and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation Corporate Citizenship Center.
Olcott, G., and Oliver, N. (2014). The impact of foreign ownership on gender and employment relations in large Japanese companies. Work, Employment and Society, 28(2), 206–224.
Ouedraogo, R., and Marlet, E. (2018). Foreign direct investment and women empowerment: New evidence on developing countries. International Monetary Fund.
Persson, A. G. (2016). Foreign direct investments in large-scale agriculture: The policy environment and its implications in Ethiopia (Doctoral dissertation).
Rasekhi, S., and Hosseinmardi, H. (2012). An impact of globalization on gender wage inequality: A case study of selected developing countries. International Journal of Business and Development Studies, 4(1), 27–40.
Seguino, S., and Grown, C. (2006). Gender equity and globalization: Macroeconomic policy for developing countries. Journal of International Development, 18(8), 1081–1104.
Stotsky, J. G. (2016). Gender budgeting: Fiscal context and current outcomes. International Monetary Fund.
UNCTAD. (2014). Investment by TNCs and gender: Preliminary assessment and way forward. Investment for Development Policy Research Series.
United Nations. (2015). The world's women 2015. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, New York.
Vahter, P., and Masso, J. (2018). The contribution of multinationals to wage inequality: Foreign ownership and the gender pay gap. University of Tartu – Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper Series, No. 106.
Vijaya, R. M., and Kaltani, L. (2007). Foreign direct investment and wages: A bargaining power approach. Journal of World-Systems Research, 13(1), 83–95.
You’re 73% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.