This paper examines the roles of three U.S. federal agencies—the Department of Homeland Security, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Secret Service—in combating cybercrime. It explores the structural and bureaucratic challenges that hinder effective collaboration among these agencies, including budget misalignment and conflicting investigative priorities. The paper also considers how the government might better align its efforts against digital threats by partnering more closely with the private sector. Drawing on peer-reviewed security research and policy analysis, the paper argues that fragmented agency missions and inadequate inter-agency communication leave critical infrastructure and financial systems unnecessarily vulnerable.
This study guide is drawn from PaperDue's library of 130,000+ paper examples across 47 subjects.
Computer crime, also known as cybercrime, is a growing and dangerous menace—not just to the federal government and all 50 state governments, but to corporate networks, private computers, and educational institution computer networks as well. Three agencies that form the core of the U.S. federal government's effort to combat computer crimes are the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the FBI, and the Secret Service.
What challenges face these three departments given the independent nature of each agency, and can they cooperate to provide steadfast collaboration against terrorists and other hackers who seek to steal sensitive information and disrupt normal business operations?
The Department of Homeland Security is a massive, multi-agency department with many responsibilities, and cybersecurity is only one of its duties. It is also responsible for border security, customs enforcement (including immigration law), and emergency management through FEMA. The Secret Service operates within the DHS bureaucracy, and while its primary function is the protection of the President of the United States and others in the executive branch, it is also tasked with protecting American currency against counterfeit organizations. Additionally, the Secret Service is assigned to investigate criminal activity involving "fund transfer frauds, access device frauds, false identification documents or devices," a mandate that encompasses cybercrime (law.cornell.edu). The FBI, meanwhile, has become deeply involved in cybercrimes and cyberterrorism since September 11, 2001, fighting organized crime and terrorism through its 56 offices nationwide.
A critical question remains: are these three agencies truly aligned and collaborating to protect computer networks, especially the federal government's most sensitive servers? Evidence suggests otherwise. The Secret Service's investigative mission "does not fit clearly into any of the DHS stated missions," according to the Quadrennial Homeland Security Review (QHSR) (Harlow, 2011). Furthermore, the Secret Service budget "has not kept pace over the past budget cycles," in part because of the agency's "inability to argue effectively for the need for this capability within DHS" (Harlow, 2). This "lack of attention to this important area of criminal activity"—computer crime in particular—leaves America's financial stability "at risk," according to Harlow.
"FBI wiretap proposal and privacy concerns"
"Recommendations for government-industry cybersecurity partnership"
Scully, the long-time defense professional and security expert, argues that "better communication between cyber-security practitioners and senior executives is essential" (206). Until the DHS, the Secret Service, and the FBI resolve their structural misalignments—budgetary, jurisdictional, and philosophical—the United States will continue to face unnecessary vulnerabilities in its digital defenses. Effective collaboration, both among federal agencies and between government and the private sector, is not optional; it is a prerequisite for meaningful protection against the growing threat of cyberterrorism and digital crime.
You’re 52% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.