FedEx Boeing 777F Fleet Decision: Relevant Cost Analysis
This paper examines FedEx Express's capital investment decision to introduce the Boeing 777F freighter aircraft into its global fleet, with the initial route designated as Memphis to London Stansted. Using relevant cost analysis, the paper distinguishes between incremental costs and revenues that should factor into the net present value calculation — such as aircraft purchase price, maintenance costs, fuel savings, and potential revenue increases — and those that should not, including sunk costs, redeployed aircraft outcomes, and allocated overhead. The analysis concludes that the purchase likely carries a positive net present value, particularly given projected long-term fuel price increases and the aircraft's superior range and efficiency compared to competing carriers' fleets.
- Introduction to FedEx Express and the Fleet Decision: FedEx operations and Boeing 777F purchase context
- Relevant Costs of the Boeing 777F Purchase: Aircraft price and incremental maintenance cost estimates
- Cost Savings and Incremental Revenue: Fuel efficiency gains and competitive revenue benefits
- Non-Relevant Costs and Sunk Costs: Why redeployment outcomes and R&D costs are excluded
- Net Present Value and Fixed Cost Considerations: NPV outcome and fixed cost scaling with fleet size
- Conclusion: Recommendation to proceed with aircraft purchase
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper applies standard managerial accounting concepts — relevant costs, sunk costs, overhead allocation, and net present value — to a real-world corporate decision, grounding abstract principles in a concrete example.
- It clearly separates relevant from non-relevant costs, explaining the reasoning for each classification rather than simply listing them.
- The paper acknowledges estimation uncertainty (e.g., incremental maintenance costs, projected fuel savings) while still demonstrating how reasonable assumptions enable financial decision-making.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates incremental cost analysis — a core technique in managerial accounting where only costs and revenues that change as a direct result of a decision are considered. By systematically excluding sunk costs, allocated overhead, and outcomes tied to independent decisions (the redeployment of older aircraft), the paper shows how isolating truly incremental cash flows leads to a cleaner and more reliable net present value estimate.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a company overview and context for the fleet decision, then identifies the relevant costs (aircraft price, incremental maintenance). It follows with an analysis of cost savings and revenue benefits, then methodically eliminates non-relevant costs including sunk costs and overhead. A brief section addresses the NPV outcome and fixed-cost scaling effects before a concise conclusion recommends the purchase contingent on reasonable assumptions.
Introduction to FedEx Express and the Fleet Decision
The organization in question is FedEx Express, the overnight courier company. The company operates a global network for picking up and distributing packages and envelopes. Most of its major fixed assets are its stations, its aircraft, and its fleets of vehicles. The company's business is highly correlated with the state of the global economy, and as a result FedEx must continually adapt its capacity in different regions according to prevailing demand conditions. For example, the company has expanded significantly in China over the past twenty years to meet the growing volume of shipments to and from that country.
One recent decision that can be evaluated through cost analysis is the decision to introduce the new Boeing 777F into the company's fleet. Adding new aircraft or vehicles to the fleet represents a significant challenge, because the maintenance department must acquire more parts, undertake new training, and potentially build or upgrade facilities to handle maintenance on the new aircraft. However, the new aircraft increases capacity on the route for which it is designated. In this case, the route for the first 777F is Memphis to London Stansted. The new plane allows for more efficient transport of goods between the United Kingdom and the United States. In addition, introducing the new plane allows FedEx to either cancel the lease on the previous aircraft used on that route or redeploy those aircraft elsewhere.
Relevant Costs of the Boeing 777F Purchase
There are a number of costs to consider when making such a purchase. The first relevant cost is the cost of the aircraft itself. The price of one of these aircraft is approximately $225 million (SC Digest, 2010). The total order is for 31 aircraft, making this a substantial capital commitment.
The second relevant cost is the cost associated with maintaining the new planes. This cost is more difficult to estimate precisely, but may not be a major cost in relative terms. It could amount to an incremental $100,000 per year per aircraft. Across the full order of 31 aircraft, the total incremental annual maintenance cost would be approximately $3.1 million.
Cost Savings and Incremental Revenue
These costs must be weighed against projected cost savings in order to determine the net present value of the investment. The new aircraft are reported to use 18% less fuel than the aircraft they replace. They are also capable of flying between China and the continental United States, or mainland Europe, without stopping to refuel. This extended range makes FedEx more operationally competitive relative to UPS, which is not purchasing the planes.
While the increase in sales and the reduction in fuel costs can be difficult to project precisely, reasonable assumptions based on past experience and statistical analysis can be developed by the company. Both the fuel savings and the incremental revenue are directly tied to the purchase decision and therefore qualify as relevant cash flows for evaluation purposes.
Conclusion
The implications of this analysis are that FedEx should pursue the new aircraft purchase. The company will see cost reductions and revenue improvements on a per-pound basis that will make the cost of the aircraft worthwhile. There are several non-relevant costs that must be omitted from the calculation, and when this is done, the realization is that the aircraft are likely to be profitable. This is especially true given that the value of the fuel reduction could be substantial in the coming years, as fuel prices are likely to rise and it is difficult to hedge jet fuel because there is no futures market for it. FedEx should therefore proceed with the aircraft purchase, assuming that the company's assumptions about cost savings and incremental revenue are reasonable.
Works Cited
FedEx Corp. (2011). FedEx United Kingdom news. FedEx Corporation. Retrieved May from
SCDigest. (2010). Global logistics news: FedEx thinks new Boeing 777 fleet is a "game changer" in air freight out of Asia. Supply Chain Digest. Retrieved May 16, 2012 from http://www.scdigest.com/assets/On_Target/10-07-15-1.php?cid=3584
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.