This paper addresses three interconnected workplace topics. First, it examines Fiedler's Least Preferred Coworker (LPC) contingency theory, analyzing how situational factors — leader-member relations, task structure, and position power — shape effective leadership behavior. Second, it evaluates how smartphones and social media have transformed workplace communication, weighing the flexibility they enable against the erosion of personal boundaries and attention spans. Finally, it presents model responses to common entry-level HR interview questions, demonstrating how a business-oriented candidate can articulate their value, qualifications, and career motivation to a prospective employer.
According to Fiedler, the character of the leader determines the ultimate outcome of all forms of decision-making within the organization. Different leaders perceive different situations in different ways. As Fiedler explains, "the key situational factor is the favorableness of the situation from the leader's point of view. This factor is determined by leader-member relations, task structure, and position power" (Fiedler 1). In other words, whether followers need direction, the flexibility demanded by the task, and the leader's degree of control over the situation will all influence the methods by which the leader exercises his or her capacity to wield power. Understanding these situational variables is central to Fiedler's contingency model, which argues that no single leadership style is universally effective.
To some extent, I do agree with LPC theory, given that in my own experiences I have seen many leaders be effective with various personality types. In the case of a workforce that is highly under-motivated — such as in a fast food restaurant — a very rigid leader who uses a "carrot and stick" approach can be functional in the sense that he or she can motivate workers to perform necessary tasks. In the case of a work situation such as an ad agency, where workers need creative and unstructured space to explore ideas, this dictatorial leadership style would be untenable. Instead, a leader who encourages, inspires, and learns from his or her employees would be needed. The same kind of fluid, unstructured employee relationship that a creative professional may thrive in might not work with a teenager who is trying to avoid work at all costs.
Universally, I think a sense of kindness and fairness, regardless of the situation, is beneficial for a leader — but different leaders are comfortable using different techniques. I personally do not enjoy being a highly dictatorial leader and prefer to trust my employees and solicit their input. That is why I do not enjoy working in environments in which the workforce is so disengaged or so inexperienced that they are unable to perform without constant direction.
"Smartphones blur work-life boundaries and shrink attention spans"
"Social media offers dual benefits for companies and customers"
"Model answers for an entry-level HR position interview"
You’re 34% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.