This paper surveys key financial measures and management practices used to evaluate organizational performance. It examines how stock prices and dividends reflect firm value, how cash flow statements reveal short- and long-term viability, and how outside analysts use financial statements in their assessments. The paper also covers cost accounting methods, the structure and purpose of operating budgets, and the role of management accounting in planning, pricing, and decision-making. Drawing on scholarly and professional sources, it concludes that while these tools are indispensable, significant subjectivity remains in their application and interpretation.
The paper effectively uses synthesized definition-then-application structuring: each financial concept is introduced through an authoritative quotation or paraphrase, followed by a brief explanation of its real-world significance. This technique shows readers not just what a term means but why it matters to managers and analysts.
The paper opens with a brief framing introduction, then proceeds through a "Review and Discussion" section organized around sequential questions covering stock prices, cash flow, outside analysis, cost accounting, budgeting, and management accounting. Each question functions as a mini-section. A concise conclusion synthesizes the main findings and acknowledges the inherent subjectivity in financial analysis. The references section follows APA formatting conventions throughout.
New business leaders, aspiring entrepreneurs, and even experienced professionals are all confronted with a bewildering array of financial measures that are commonly used to reflect how well companies are performing. Moreover, a number of management tools are available that can be used to evaluate these financial measures, provided that the practitioner understands what they mean and how they can be applied. To this end, this paper provides a review of the relevant scholarly literature concerning various financial measures and management practices, followed by a summary of the research and key findings in the conclusion.
Although they are not infallible, stock prices provide a general reflection of the fundamental value of a firm, including the present discounted value of future firm earnings (Carlstrom, Fuerst & Ioannidou, 2002). By contrast, the payment of stock dividends reflects value in a firm because these "represent distributions paid out by the company to stockholders based on the outstanding shares (issued shares less treasury shares)" (Siegel & Shim, 2001, p. 152).
While cash flows are continuous and "the action never stops," statements of cash flow provide a periodic snapshot of how much money is being spent and where it is going. In this regard, Siciliano (2003) reports that "there is a continuous flow of action captured in the company's income statement and its statement of cash flow. Accountants provide an income statement and statement of cash flow adding up the changes that happened during the month-long activity, and a balance sheet that shows where everything was on the last day of the month" (p. 19).
Because all investors are not equally informed concerning a firm's financial viability, cash flow statements and other financial statements provide a means of ensuring the fiscal health of the firm (Carlstrom et al., 2002). Among other financial indicators, financial analysts frequently include the following in their assessment of firm viability:
1. Current cost — the amount of cash or equivalent that would have to be paid if the same or an equivalent asset were acquired currently;
2. Current market value;
3. Net realizable value; and
4. Present value of future cash flows (Powers, 1999, p. 231).
The research showed that financial measures such as stock prices, statements of cash flow, and financial statements are tools that business leaders and analysts use to evaluate the performance of companies of all types and sizes. The research also showed that the budgeting process is used by companies to gain control over income sources and outlays, and to identify how well budget projections reflect real-world accomplishments. In the final analysis, all of these methods and tools can facilitate the understanding of organizational performance; however, the research also indicates that a great deal of subjectivity in the analyses must be taken into account.
You’re 36% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.