This paper examines Elisabeth Kübler-Ross's five-stage model of grief—Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression, and Acceptance—as a universal framework for human loss, and analyzes how two distinct religious traditions engage with those stages. Drawing on the biblical Book of Job, the paper shows how the Judeo-Christian tradition frames grief within a relationship of sin, punishment, and divine will. It then contrasts this with Taoism, where grief is understood as a disruption of personal harmony with the universe, and the goal is to move through the stages in order to restore that inner balance. Together, these examples illustrate that while the emotional stages of grief are universal, religious frameworks shape the meaning and experience of loss in profoundly different ways.
In 1969, Elisabeth Kübler-Ross, a Swiss researcher, presented a list of five stages that individuals experience when dealing with death. Since then, these principles have been applied to loss and grief more broadly. The five stages of the Kübler-Ross model are Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression, and Acceptance. It can be asserted that these stages are experienced in one form or another by all humans, regardless of cultural background ("Five Stages of Grief"). In other words, the five stages of loss and grief are emotional reactions that are universally experienced. (Kübler-Ross, 2005, p. 199) Different religions have traditionally created their own means of dealing with loss and grief — particularly in the context of death — and while they may approach the subject from different points of view, they all must reckon with the five stages that people experience when grieving.
In the Judeo-Christian religious tradition, grief and loss are subjects widely discussed throughout the Bible. The story of Job offers a particularly rich example: Job is a deeply religious man whose faith is tested by a series of devastating losses, including the loss of his family's fortune and his own health. While Job experiences all five stages of grief, the acceptance he must ultimately reach is not the acceptance of loss itself, but rather the acceptance that his life is in God's hands and that everything unfolds according to God's plan.
When Job is first afflicted, he enters a state of denial — not that something terrible has happened, but that he has sinned and deserves punishment. Because he is not a sinner, he cannot understand why he has suffered such loss. Although his wife and friends urge him to curse God for his suffering, Job denies that his grief has anything to do with divine punishment.
As time passes and his suffering intensifies, Job moves into the Anger stage, cursing the day he was born. Even so, he refuses to direct his anger at God. Instead, Job declares he is "weary of life; [and] will leave my complaint upon myself." (Job 10:1) He may be angry at his situation, but not at God — the ultimate source of his suffering.
The Bargaining stage is something Job considers, though it would require him to come face-to-face with God and plead his case that he is undeserving of his pain. In contemplating this bargain, Job also moves closer to accepting that his loss and grief are indeed caused by God. However, in chapter 24 Job falls into the fourth stage — Depression — delivering a speech in which he admits that evil often prospers at the expense of good and that God does not always appear to reward the righteous. In his depression, Job edges toward accepting that God's will is mysterious, and that the suffering he has endured may be part of a larger divine plan.
"Taoism frames grief as disruption of universal harmony"
"Taoist practices guide grievers toward restored harmony"
The focus of Taoism in relation to grief is to provide the individual with the tools needed to move through the stages and arrive at Acceptance. The Tao of Loss and Grief offers several examples of how Taoist thought can help re-establish personal harmony. For instance, one passage asks: "Are you able to stay focused on the importance of your loss?… Are you able to see your loss in the larger picture of life? Give yourself credit for the ways you are getting through your grief." (Metz, 2000, p. 21) The five stages of grief may be universal human emotions, but Taoism offers a structured means of moving through those stages and eventually restoring the harmony that grief has disrupted — by fully engaging with each stage and progressing toward acceptance of the loss.
Elisabeth Kübler-Ross's five stages of grief represent the universal way humans react to loss, but different religious traditions have created different frameworks through which individuals experience those stages. In the Judeo-Christian tradition, loss is often associated with moral reckoning, and the grieving person experiences the five stages in terms of their relationship with God and their own actions. This view allows for anger, depression, and — since one's actions are perceived as contributing to one's suffering — the impulse to bargain for relief through changed behavior. Taoism, by contrast, emphasizes the restoration of harmony with the universe. Rather than identifying the cause of suffering and attempting to eliminate or change it, Taoism is primarily concerned with helping the individual move through the five stages in order to regain inner balance. Both traditions ultimately guide the grieving person toward acceptance, but the paths they prescribe reflect their deepest philosophical and theological commitments.
You’re 72% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.