This paper examines the distinction between fixed and variable costs within an emergency department setting. Using examples such as staff salaries and medication supplies, it explains how each cost type behaves relative to patient volume. The paper then analyzes what happens to average fixed costs (AFC) and average variable costs (AVC) when emergency department volumes decline, demonstrating that AFC rises while AVC falls. Finally, it considers the net effect on average total costs, noting that the outcome depends on the relative magnitude and speed of changes in each cost component, with implications for profit margins and financial sustainability.
Understanding how costs behave in a healthcare setting is essential for effective financial management. In the emergency department, costs can be classified as either fixed or variable depending on how they respond to changes in patient volume. This distinction has important implications for budgeting, pricing, and overall financial sustainability.
Fixed costs are costs that do not change with changes in output levels (Smith, 2013). In the emergency department, fixed costs remain constant regardless of the number of patients treated. An example of a fixed cost in the emergency department is the monthly salary of permanent staff, such as emergency nurse practitioners and physicians. The salary is a constant amount agreed upon at the start of the contract period and does not vary based on the number of patients seen in a given period. The facility incurs this cost even when no patients visit.
Conversely, variable costs are costs that change with changes in output or activity levels (Smith, 2013). They increase as activity levels rise and decrease as activity levels fall. An example of a variable cost in the emergency department is patient care supplies such as medications. The cost of medications is directly influenced by the number of patients in a given period — it increases when patient numbers rise and decreases when numbers decline. If no patients visit the facility, there will be no expenditure on medications.
Changes in the volume of production affect both average fixed costs and average variable costs. Average fixed cost (AFC) is obtained by dividing total fixed costs in a period by the total units of output (Shim & Siegel, 2008). It represents the proportion of fixed costs attributable to a single unit of output. A fall in production volumes means the organization produces fewer units of output — in the emergency department, this translates to a decline in the number of patients treated.
Fixed costs do not change with production levels; however, reductions in production volume increase average fixed costs because the same total cost is spread across fewer units of output (Shim & Siegel, 2008). For instance, a fixed physician's salary must now be allocated across fewer patients, resulting in a higher AFC per patient.
At the same time, declining volumes reduce average variable costs (AVC). Average variable cost is the proportion of variable costs attributable to a single unit of output, calculated by dividing total variable costs by units of output in a given period (Shim & Siegel, 2008). Fewer patients mean the facility spends less on costs such as medications, which are dictated by patient volume. A decline in variable costs coupled with a decrease in the number of patients produces lower average variable costs.
A fall in emergency department volumes would therefore increase average fixed costs while decreasing average variable costs. The net effect on average total costs would depend on the extent of the increase in fixed costs and how quickly variable costs fall as a result of the change in volume (Lee, 2019). If the increase in fixed costs is substantial, a fall in volume will raise average total costs unless variable costs can decline quickly enough to offset the rise in fixed costs (Lee, 2019). If variable costs do not fall quickly, the increase in fixed costs will reduce profit margins by raising the average cost of production.
Lee, R. H. (2019). Economics for Healthcare Managers (4th ed.). Riverside, CA: American College of Healthcare.
Shim, J. K., & Siegel, J. G. (2008). Budgeting Basics and Beyond (3rd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
"Combined cost impact and profit margin implications"
You’re 93% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.