This paper examines the operations and financial viability of a small, hand-crafted chair manufacturer based in New Mexico. It evaluates the company's competitive environment, including limited bargaining power, international competition, and trade policy risks. Using income statement data and marginal analysis, the paper assesses short-run and long-run conditions for continuing or shutting down operations. It then explores the impact of a proposed minimum wage increase on marginal costs and profitability, and outlines strategies — including customer expansion, efficiency improvements, and automation — that could help the firm remain viable. The paper concludes with clear criteria for when shutdown becomes the rational economic choice.
The paper applies marginal analysis — comparing marginal revenue to marginal cost at each decision point — to answer a practical business question. This technique is used correctly in both the short-run and long-run contexts, showing the student understands that the shutdown rule differs depending on the time horizon. The use of a hypothetical wage increase as a sensitivity test further demonstrates competent applied microeconomic reasoning.
The paper opens with a description of the competitive environment and the firm's weak bargaining position. It then presents the income statement and applies marginal analysis to assess current viability. A wage-increase scenario tests how quickly profitability could flip. Two strategic responses — expanding the customer base and improving efficiency — are evaluated before the paper closes with explicit shutdown criteria. The argument flows from diagnosis to financial modeling to prescription.
This business makes hand-crafted chairs in New Mexico for a company that brands and markets them through a variety of channels. The wood used is either locally sourced or brought in from Colorado, and the craftspeople possess modest woodworking skills sufficient to construct the chairs.
The competitive environment for this product is challenging. Chairs are a relatively straightforward product to manufacture, and the more trade agreements the government signs, the more competition the business faces. As a result, the company has very limited bargaining power over its buyers, because the buyer can substitute product from Mexico, China, and a number of other low-cost sources. Only lower shipping costs and a strong, established relationship appear to work in the company's favor.
The contract with this major buyer is the main determinant of whether or not the company will shut down. The buyer, in turn, is affected by the global furniture market, tariffs and trade barriers, the emergence of competing suppliers, and the value of the U.S. dollar — an important factor in determining whether importing the chairs is cheaper. Without this buyer, the company is unlikely to sell enough chairs to sustain operations. However, the business has survived in this challenging environment for several years, and it is important to recognize that the potential to grow still exists.
There are several aspects to the company's financial performance. The income statement below reveals whether the company is currently earning a profit:
Revenue: $192,000
Direct Labor: $140,000
Variable Costs: $40,000
Net Income: $12,000
The company earned $12,000 last month. Marginal revenue is $32, and marginal cost is $30. The average total cost is also $30 at this point.
Based on these figures, the company should continue operating. In the short run, a company should remain in business as long as revenue covers variable costs. With a marginal revenue of $32 and marginal variable costs of $30, that condition is currently met. For the short run, therefore, the company should continue in business.
In the long run, a company should remain in business as long as marginal revenue covers marginal costs. At this point, that condition is also satisfied — marginal revenue exceeds marginal costs — so long-run continuation is justified under current conditions.
You’re 43% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.