This paper provides a comprehensive strategic analysis of Ford Motor Company, tracing the automaker's origins from its 1903 incorporation through its evolution into a global automotive brand family. The paper examines Ford's internal strengths — including its dominant share of the police car market — and weaknesses such as safety controversies and limited overseas presence. It then surveys the external environment, highlighting rising oil prices and the shift toward hybrid vehicles. Drawing on analyst data and academic research, the paper evaluates Ford's SWOT position, corporate-level branding strategy, and business-level revenue management approach before concluding with recommendations for international expansion and hybrid vehicle development.
As Ford Motor Company itself proudly declares, "The dream became a business." The inception of Ford is one of the critical steps in the industrialization of America and the West in general. According to Ford's public relations department: "Ford Motor Company entered the business world on June 16, 1903, when Henry Ford and 11 business associates signed the company's articles of incorporation. With $28,000 in cash, the pioneering industrialists gave birth to what was to become one of the world's largest corporations. Few companies are as closely identified with the history and development of industry and society throughout the 20th century as Ford Motor Company."
As with most large multinational corporations, Ford Motor Company's beginnings were humble. The company suffered through many anxious moments in its infancy. The earliest record of a shipment dates to July 20, 1903 — approximately one month after the company's incorporation — when a car was delivered to a Detroit doctor. With the company's first sale came hope, and a young Ford Motor Company had taken its first steps.
Assembly line mass production, however, was Ford's greatest contribution to industrialization. First used at the Highland Park plant in Michigan in 1913, the new assembly line technique allowed individual workers to remain in one location and perform the same task repeatedly on multiple vehicles passing by them. The line proved tremendously efficient, helping the company far surpass the production levels of its competitors while simultaneously making automobiles more affordable.
According to Ford's public relations department: "Henry Ford insisted that the company's future lay in the production of affordable cars for a mass market. Beginning in 1903, the company began using the first 19 letters of the alphabet to name new cars. In 1908, the Model T was born. Nineteen years and 15 million Model T's later, Ford Motor Company was a giant industrial complex that spanned the globe. In 1925, Ford Motor Company acquired the Lincoln Motor Company, thus branching out into luxury cars, and in the 1930s the Mercury division was created to establish a division centered on mid-priced cars. Ford Motor Company was growing."
The 1950s brought the celebrated Thunderbird and the opportunity to own a share of the famed Ford Motor Company. The company went public, and on February 24, 1956, it gained approximately 350,000 new stockholders. Henry Ford II's keen perception of political and economic trends in the 1950s led to the global expansion of Ford in the 1960s and the establishment of Ford of Europe in 1967 — twenty years ahead of the European Economic Community's arrival. The company established its North American Automotive Operations in 1971, consolidating U.S., Canadian, and Mexican operations more than two decades before the North American Free Trade Agreement.
Ford Motor Company began the twentieth century with a single man — Henry Ford — envisioning goods that would meet the needs of people in a world on the verge of high-speed industrialization. Today, Ford Motor Company is a family of automotive brands consisting of Ford, Lincoln, Mercury, Mazda, Jaguar, Land Rover, Aston Martin, and Volvo. According to Ford's public relations department: "The company is beginning its second century of existence with a worldwide organization that retains and expands Henry Ford's heritage by developing products that serve the varying and ever-changing needs of people in the global community."
Ford's primary strength is a reliable base of institutional purchasers in an era when American automobile manufacturers are struggling. Ford's Crown Victoria Interceptor, for instance, holds approximately 85 percent of the police car market (The Center for Auto Safety, 2005). As a result, Ford maintains a direct and stable stream of accounts receivable from such contracts. Ford also performs well in the taxi cab and rental car purchaser markets. Consequently, even when personal car purchasing rates decline during economic downturns, Ford is able to weather those difficult periods with the more stable demand from police, taxi, and rental fleet buyers.
However, a significant weakness for Ford has been recent safety controversies. In the police car market, recalls have become common: "Ford, which has about 85 percent of the police car market, came under fire last year after several cities and law enforcement agencies across the country filed lawsuits and voiced concerns about the risks of the Interceptor catching fire after high-speed, rear-end wrecks. In October 2002, Ford announced plans to begin installing rubber and plastic shields around the gas tanks of the nearly 350,000 Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptors. Ford estimated it would cost approximately $50 million to furnish the shields aimed at preventing items from penetrating the fuel tank. At the same time, the automaker announced plans to offer an optional $250 trunk-pack cabinet to safely store sharp-edged, heavy equipment used by police officers." (The Center for Auto Safety, 2005)
These safety issues were compounded by the Ford Explorer / Firestone tire controversy that damaged Ford's reputation in the late 1990s and early 2000s. The average consumer today perceives Japanese competitors' cars as both safer and more reliable than Ford's offerings — a perception that presents a serious challenge and registers as a clear weakness in any SWOT analysis.
Additionally, while General Motors has managed the weakening of the American auto market and the growing popularity of Japanese and German vehicles by expanding sales overseas, Ford does not have nearly the same international presence. As a result, Ford is more vulnerable to the shifting preference toward foreign cars among average American households.
The external pressures facing Ford in its core business can be summarized in one word: oil. With elevated geopolitical tensions in the Middle East driving energy prices upward, the price of oil rose to well over $3 per gallon in most American states at the time of this analysis. This pushed the American auto market decisively toward hybrids and other vehicles with lower fuel dependency.
Consequently, the external environment presents significant challenges to Ford's strategic position. In order to compete effectively into this century, Ford must produce more products such as its mid-level SUV hybrid, the Ford Escape Hybrid. However, that alone is insufficient. Luxury hybrid SUVs were already entering the market, and Ford needed to follow suit. The SUV remained the vehicle of choice in the personal automobile market, and with gas prices elevated, Ford faced strong external pressure to develop a competitive luxury hybrid SUV.
Ford also needed to focus on expanding its overseas operations, as General Motors had done. The General Motors Opel line met with considerable success in Europe and beyond, while Ford had very limited presence in some of the world's fastest-growing automobile markets, including India.
Ford overall was in a reasonable position as it moved through the early 21st century, as indicated by trends presented by financial analysts. Analyst recommendation data showed a majority recommending holding Ford stock, with two strong buy ratings, twelve hold ratings, one sell, and two strong sell ratings in the most recent reporting period (Yahoo Finance, 2005). In general, the preponderance of hold recommendations suggests that the company was reasonably well positioned to continue performing, if not outperforming.
"Analyst ratings and downgrade trends assessed"
"Multi-brand strategy across all price segments"
"Revenue management tools and per-unit pricing strategy"
"Executive restructuring and overseas expansion recommendations"
You’re 50% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 4 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.