This paper analyzes the marketing strategy of the Ford Mustang, examining the brand's strengths and weaknesses, external threats, and available opportunities. The paper argues that while the Mustang benefits from iconic brand recognition and strong consumer loyalty, its current positioning as a low-end performance vehicle undervalues the brand. The author recommends a promotional shift toward highlighting premium models such as the Shelby to generate aspirational appeal, expand the target demographic, and cultivate cult-like brand loyalty. Pricing, distribution, and the core product line are largely retained in the proposed strategy, with incremental changes to upselling and dealer availability of high-end models.
The paper demonstrates applied marketing analysis: it moves from situational assessment (SWOT) to strategic recommendation (marketing mix adjustments). This mirrors the standard marketing management framework, showing how brand equity analysis can directly inform promotional, pricing, and distribution decisions.
The paper opens with a brand-level SWOT analysis covering recognition, legacy pressure, and competitive threats. It then transitions into marketing mix recommendations organized by the classic 4Ps — Product, Promotion, Price, and Place (Distribution) — with an additional section on market segmentation. Each section builds on the preceding analysis, culminating in a focused recommendation to shift promotional emphasis toward the Mustang's premium models.
The strength of the Ford Mustang brand is that it is immediately recognizable and iconic. Anyone within the target audience will instantly recognize the brand and understand what traits the vehicle will have. While this might also stand as a weakness — because the brand carries distinct connotations — those connotations are not negative for people who fall within the target audience. The power of the car, combined with its value, is a common feature of modern Mustang advertisements (YouTube, 2010).
One of the weaknesses of Mustang marketing is that the brand must continually live up to its history. As noted in a clip from the British television show Top Gear, Mustangs today are often measured against Mustangs of the past (Top Gear, 2009). That clip also reveals a couple of additional weaknesses in the marketing of the Mustang. The price component is identified by the reviewers as a drawback, because it compels Ford to cut corners in vehicle design. Performance is compromised relative to power — something that could have been avoided, and indeed is on the highest-end models, had the company been willing to price the brand higher.
Also noted was that customization of the Mustang was one of its main selling points during its heyday. Protecting the price is not necessary because the best Mustang is not available at the lowest price point, and consumers often prefer a better car over a cheaper one. This creates a dilemma with the vehicle's positioning: while the Mustang is currently positioned as something of a low-end performance car, the Mustang that many consumers actually want is perhaps a little higher end.
There are limited but meaningful opportunities for the marketing of the Mustang brand. The brand has a fairly narrow appeal, but there is an opportunity to extend that appeal somewhat — especially to consumers who enjoyed the original Mustangs and want to recapture some of that pleasure from their youth. This is roughly the same target market that Harley-Davidson has cultivated: accomplished, middle-aged professionals who want to reconnect with their past. These customers are willing to pay for a better Mustang, and while Ford does offer a couple of higher-end models to appeal to such consumers, there is perhaps more opportunity here than the company currently realizes.
There are also significant threats in the external environment. The Mustang faces direct competition, but it also faces challenges in the broader economic environment that are suppressing consumer spending. Additionally, high fuel costs pose a threat, as they discourage consumers from purchasing muscle cars in favor of more fuel-efficient vehicles.
Ford is currently using the Mustang as an introductory vehicle, with its pricing set below that of the Chevrolet Camaro. However, the Mustang is a very strong brand closely associated with power. The company's website highlights the base offering and uses it to compare against competitors, with price and value as the key points of attractiveness. This may be the Mustang that the company sells most often, but it is not the one that consumers really want to buy.
If a consumer buys the base model, it is typically because they cannot afford the Mustang they truly want. The recommended marketing approach should reflect this reality, with an emphasis on upselling. The Top Gear clip focused on the top models, and even a mixed review whetted the appetite for those vehicles. The reason for this strategy is that it is the high-end models that generate real consumer excitement. The buying demographic for the Shelby and other top models is slightly different, but these cars carry an aspirational value that makes them an enticing proposition even for consumers who cannot actually afford them.
Part of the problem is that Ford has considered bringing back the GT (Wert, 2011), a higher-end muscle car that the company had not carried in recent years. Ford appears to be reserving some market positioning for the GT and is therefore reluctant to move the Mustang into that space. Nevertheless, the marketing of the Mustang can be positioned slightly differently from the models that most buyers actually purchase.
You’re 55% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.