This paper examines India's landmark policy shift allowing foreign banks to establish wholly owned subsidiaries in the Indian banking sector for the first time in decades. It traces the history of Indian banking from Indira Gandhi's nationalization drive in the late 1960s through the liberalization reforms of 1991, the partial opening to foreign ownership in 2004, and the new regulations announced in 2013 under Reserve Bank of India Governor Raghuram Rajan. The paper also discusses how India's nationalized, conservative banking structure served as a protective buffer during the 2008 global financial crisis triggered by the collapse of Lehman Brothers, and outlines the conditions — including minimum capital requirements and reciprocity provisions — attached to the new foreign bank rules.
It was recently announced that foreign banks, for the first time in decades, will be allowed to enter the Indian banking industry and set up "wholly owned subsidiaries" in India ("India Eases Rules for Foreign Banks"). Since the nation obtained independence in the late 1940s, the Indian banking system has undergone radical changes, none more significant than in the late 1960s, when Prime Minister Indira Gandhi began to nationalize the entire banking sector. The effort was an attempt to shift the focus of Indian banks from profit-driven institutions to ones that could aid in the economic transformation of the country, primarily the development of rural areas. This system of government direction kept Indian banks somewhat isolated from the international banking industry.
When Indira Gandhi nationalized India's major banks in the late 1960s, the explicit goal was to redirect banking resources toward rural development and broader economic transformation rather than toward commercial profit. While this policy succeeded in expanding banking access across India's countryside, it also insulated Indian banks from the competitive pressures and innovations occurring in global financial markets. As other nations' banking sectors grew and integrated internationally, India's remained tightly controlled and domestically focused, limiting its overall expansion and participation in the global economy.
In 2008, when the collapse of the American banking giant Lehman Brothers precipitated a global banking crisis, India's nationalized system proved to be an unexpected advantage. The "conservative RBI (Reserve Bank of India) never allowed local banks to take excessive risks and built a safety wall brick by brick around the banking system" (Bandyopadhyay). This protective structure shielded Indian banks from the worst effects of the global financial crisis, demonstrating that the long-standing policy of cautious, government-directed banking had at least one significant benefit in an era of international financial instability.
"1991 reforms opened path to partial foreign ownership"
"Rajan sets capital requirements and reciprocity conditions"
In the 1960s, India attempted to refocus the direction of its banking system in order to aid in the development of the countryside. However, this decision kept Indian banks from growing and expanding, as many other nations' banks did. And while this system protected the Indian banking sector from the crisis of 2008, the overriding concerns of expanding the banking system have compelled the Reserve Bank of India to continue with the planned liberalization and expansion of the sector. The governor of the RBI has announced that India will begin to allow foreign banks — which had previously been permitted only part-ownership of Indian banks — to become full owners. It is hoped that in the short term this will bring much-needed capital to the country and help ease inflation, and that in the long term it will aid in the expansion of the Indian banking system within an increasingly globalized economy.
You’re 58% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.