This essay examines how Alice Walker constructs "Everyday Use" so that its narrative form directly serves its emotional and thematic function. By analyzing the story's non-linear structure, the essay argues that Walker deliberately introduces backstory and character detail before the central quilt episode in order to build reader empathy. Through close readings of key passages—including descriptions of Maggie's injury, the mother's self-portrait, and Dee's estrangement from her roots—the essay demonstrates how the contrast between the two sisters illuminates themes of identity, acceptance, and cultural belonging. The essay concludes that form and function are inseparable in the story's design.
The essay demonstrates form-function analysis—the practice of showing how an author's structural choices (here, non-linear narration) are not arbitrary but exist in service of a specific affective or thematic purpose. By asking what would be lost if the story were told linearly, the writer tests the argument against a counterfactual, which strengthens the analytical claim.
The essay opens with a thesis-anchoring analogy, then traces the story's pre-action backstory as an empathy-building device. It moves through character contrast, evaluates the non-linear structure, connects structural choice to the story's theme of acceptance, and closes with a synthesis. Each paragraph advances from the previous, producing a mostly linear argumentative arc despite discussing a non-linear text.
"Form follows function" is a tried and true aphorism in architecture as well as in literature. Just as Frank Lloyd Wright's Fallingwater is built to showcase the natural beauty of water — it is literally constructed over a waterfall — a successful short story must be wrought in a way that emphasizes the soul of the story. Alice Walker's "Everyday Use" is a story about many things: family, identity, race, and culture. But at the end of the day, the story's purpose is to have an effect on the reader.
To maximize this effect, Walker's story is told non-linearly, revealing plaintive details of the characters' lives and experiences that appeal to the reader's empathetic sensibilities before the main action takes place. That is to say, if the story had started on page 51 and simply recounted the quilt episode without the details in the backstory, the reader would not be affected in the same way — the episode would feel flat and uninvolving.
Walker wants the reader to be engaged with the hard, provincial upbringing of the story's main characters. She wants the reader to understand that life has not been easy for the protagonist or her daughters. But Walker also wants to create a clear separation: the protagonist and Maggie on one side, and Dee on the other. Although life has been hard for all of them, Dee has taken a different approach — perhaps even caught a break in life that Maggie has certainly not had.
The mother explains, "She thinks her sister has held life always in the palm of one hand, that 'no' is a word the world never learned to say to her" (Walker 47). Right here the reader recognizes the otherness Dee possesses. Whereas Maggie, like her mother, is provincial, Dee is worldly and cultured. Dee is described as having style, whereas the mother describes herself as "large, big boned with rough, man-working hands" (Walker 47).
Then there is this description of Maggie, which is particularly heartrending when set against the image the reader has already developed of Dee: "Have you ever seen a lame animal, perhaps a dog run over by some careless person rich enough to own a car, sidle up to someone who is ignorant enough to be kind to him? This is the way my Maggie walks" (Walker 49). There is obviously a great deal going on in this metaphor. For one, the reader gains a sense of how impoverished the family really is — they are so poor they cannot afford a car, though this may also reflect the economics of the time period.
More importantly, the imagery gives Maggie genuine depth as a fictional character. She is compared to a lame, injured animal, and the reader soon learns she was badly burned in a fire. The point Walker is driving home is clear: Maggie and Dee come from the same place but are, in every meaningful sense, two very different people. Alice Walker uses this contrast not simply for dramatic effect but to prepare the reader emotionally for the conflict over the quilts that follows.
As readers, we must recognize that stories are told the way they are on purpose. That purpose — in this case the form — is inextricably bound to the overall effect the story creates in the reader. As much as we enjoy deconstructing and dissecting aspects of fictional narratives, we must bear in mind that fiction works because it is indivisible: because form not only follows function, but because form is melded to function. In "Everyday Use," Walker's structural choices and her thematic concerns are one and the same.
You’re 61% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.