Isolation and Revenge in Frankenstein: Social Rejection
This paper examines the interconnected themes of social isolation, acceptance, and revenge in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. The author argues that the creature's monstrosity stems not from his physical appearance alone, but from society's categorical rejection of him as inherently evil. Through analysis of key quotations and literary devices—particularly Shelley's use of nature imagery and foreshadowing—the paper demonstrates how the creature's emotional suffering justifies his vengeful actions, ultimately revealing the cruelty embedded in Victor's act of creation. The analysis shows how Shelley uses literary techniques to interweave Victor's psychological deterioration with the creature's justified rage.
- Social Rejection and the Monster: Monstrosity as social judgment, not nature
- The Psychology of Revenge: Emotional suffering justifies the creature's rage
- Nature as Psychological Anchor: Nature imagery stabilizes Victor's deteriorating mind
- Foreshadowing and Emotional Darkness: The moon signals darkness and the creature's emergence
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Uses personal reflection to deepen literary analysis, moving beyond summary to emotional engagement with the text
- Connects abstract concepts (monstrosity, acceptance, revenge) to the creature's concrete human needs (belonging, love)
- Pairs thematic argument with close textual analysis of specific quotations and literary devices
- Builds a coherent causal chain: rejection → suffering → justified revenge, showing how Shelley's technique reinforces meaning
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates the integration of personal response with formal literary analysis. Rather than treating emotional reaction as separate from critical reading, the author uses phrases like "I felt the hopelessness" and "I know deep down" to anchor abstract literary concepts in human experience. This technique is particularly effective for thematic essays because it authenticates the argument—the reader sees why the interpretation matters—while maintaining focus on textual evidence (quotations, imagery, narrative technique).
Structure breakdown
The essay follows a two-part structure. The first section establishes theme through thematic argument supported by quotation and personal reflection: monstrosity as social construction, leading to the creature's quest for revenge. The second section (labeled as "Quotes and Literary Terms Explained") shifts to close reading, analyzing how Shelley's technical choices—nature metaphor and moon-based foreshadowing—reinforce the thematic concerns. This allows the paper to move from "what the novel says" to "how the novel says it," a move that strengthens both the argument and the reader's understanding of Shelley's craft.
Social Rejection and the Monster
A powerful quote introduced me to a different kind of viewpoint concerning humanity and its perception of normalcy and goodness. Society shuns and excludes numerous individuals from everyday life because people do not respect nor appreciate them. This exclusion sometimes depends solely on appearance and other shallow markers—what they wear, how much money they have, and how closely they fit an idealized standard. In Frankenstein, the creature begins as an outcast. He is born a "freak" and has no possibility of being normal, of belonging.
The creature is a monster, and monsters are reviled in story and legend. They are instantly seen as evil. Therefore, even if the creature wanted to be good, none of his actions would change society's view of him. To society, he is nothing more than a mistake that must be corrected. I felt the hopelessness of the creature. I also felt the lack of acceptance he experienced when he recognized what he was and who he is.
To people who see the creature roam the streets, he is a dark shadow—a monster of evil nature stalking its prey at night. When I read the final words of the novel's emotional climax, it made me feel sad. This is because I know that deep down, society never accepts too much ugliness. It strives for the ideal, and anything that deviates from that standard is deemed monstrous, regardless of the heart or mind within.
The Psychology of Revenge
Revenge is something people feel when they are desperate, angry, and deeply hurt. The creature did not ask his creator to form him. Nor did he desire anything other than to feel loved and to belong—which is why he asked for a mate. However, when faced with the painful reality of his limitations and the restrictions cast upon him at birth, it makes sense that revenge becomes all he has left. Revenge is ultimately what remains when someone is greatly hurt emotionally. I have not reached such a point myself, but if I were to, I would understand why. It takes a great deal of suffering for someone to enact revenge. The creature could not bear the burden of existing without taking some of that pain out on his creator.
Victor knew what he was doing when he created the creature. He chose to make him. The creature did not have a say in the matter. He was merely a product of an experiment. The creature senses the cruelty in this and seeks to justify it through his actions. Victor's act of creation was not one of compassion but of ambition, leaving the creature to suffer the consequences of a choice he never made.
Nature as Psychological Anchor
In the quote, "What became of me? I know not; I lost sensation, and chains and darkness were the only objects that pressed upon me. Sometimes, indeed, I dreamt that I wandered in flowery meadows and pleasant vales with the friends of my youth..." (Shelley, 138), the use of nature serves as a metaphor to describe the connection between Victor and his sanity. Nature is tied to the ever-changing landscape of his environment and his mental state. Nature acts as a way for him to stay sane. It is what he clings to most when the creature begins his plan to make Victor suffer. Without such a connection, the creature's actions and Victor's descent into insanity would feel somewhat disjointed. The natural imagery grounds the psychological horror in something tangible and beautiful, making the contrast between Victor's inner torment and the external world all the more profound.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.