This paper examines gender identity as a critical but often overlooked concept in social work practice. It explores the social construction of gender expression, common misunderstandings social workers hold about gender and sexual minority identities, and how the LGBTQIA acronym better captures societal diversity than the traditional LGBT label. The paper also addresses how gender identity develops through adolescence and into young and middle adulthood, drawing on biological and social factors. Finally, it outlines practical strategies — including inclusive language, respectful inquiry, and client-centered communication — that social workers can adopt to serve clients navigating gender identity questions more effectively.
Social work initiatives across the nation help practitioners prepare for a number of challenging content areas encountered over the course of a career. Yet the subject of gender identity is often dismissed, despite its relevance to everyone's life. In fact, social workers regularly encounter clients who experience gender identity struggles to some extent (Irvin & Mckay, 2013). The social work profession fundamentally entails working with people; a comparable definition stresses its "social" significance while simultaneously recognizing individuals' gender identity and their receptiveness to broader influential systems (Hawkes and Scott, 2005, p. 7).
Gender expression is socially constructed, based on cultural expectations and standards. For instance, most people would agree that little girls do not innately love all things "pink" or wish to dress dolls — these preferences are taught through interactions with society. Individuals learn the behaviors and gender expressions their society considers acceptable for males and females by observing and imitating others. Common norms include, for example, that females should wear dresses and maintain long hair, while males should wear pants and keep their hair short. Anyone who violates these societal "rules" is considered transgressive. By recognizing that such norms originate in collective social expectations rather than in nature, a social worker — and a member of society — can become more accepting of those who are "different" (Irvin & Mckay, 2013).
A social worker takes pride in their inclusivity and cultural competence. However, when it comes to gender identity, practitioners sometimes fail to appreciate the vast diversity that surrounds them. For instance, social workers commonly use the acronym LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) in an effort to signal inclusivity of gender and sexual minorities — but this label does not adequately represent the full breadth of societal gender and sexual diversity. A more inclusive acronym would be LGBTQIA (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, questioning/queer, intersex, and asexual). Even this expanded acronym, however, does not sufficiently capture the wide spectrum of identity, attraction, and gender identity-related behavior.
The social work profession must continually strive to develop a better understanding of societal diversity in order to better serve clients who come with a wide range of questions and concerns (Dunk, 2007). Practitioners must work to build a welcoming and inclusive atmosphere regardless of the population they serve. Adopting more inclusive language — particularly with respect to gender and sexual minorities — will help cultivate a therapeutic and safe environment for all clients (Irvin & Mckay, 2013).
Considerable progress has been made in recent years regarding knowledge of gender-variant behavior in both boys (male anatomic sex) and girls (female anatomic sex). Western society has generally been more tolerant of gender variance in girls — "tomboys" typically do fairly well at school. Gender variance in boys ("sissy boys"), however, is more easily noticed and has historically received less support from parents, siblings, and society. It is becoming increasingly clear that this type of gender variance is biologically equivalent across males and females and does not necessarily indicate a childhood gender identity disorder. The converse is also true: insofar as these behaviors are linked to gender identity incongruence or confusion, both boys and girls may exhibit such symptoms (Ghosh, 2015).
The instrumental aspects of personality traits, sexuality, anxieties, and peer interaction prove most significant to gender development during adolescence. Classmates, schoolmates, and playmates first reinforce an emerging gender identity that parents have nurtured from infancy through childhood. Pubertal development during adolescence often strengthens this identity, as the physical changes of puberty provide concrete external confirmation of an individual's inner self-image. While some scholars hold that gender identity is rooted in early childhood, it becomes clear that by late adolescence and young adulthood, a person's permanent gender identity is firmly established. Typically, a corresponding gender role will also be well defined, as will gender identity within the broader context of a person's sexual identity (Ghosh, 2015).
"How gender identity develops across life stages"
"Client-centered strategies for gender-competent practice"
You’re 65% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.