This paper examines the persistent gender inequalities women face in employment, education, and workplace learning across developed and developing economies. Despite increased female participation in the labor force and higher education attainment, women continue to earn significantly less than men, concentrate in lower-paid feminized occupations, and receive fewer training opportunities. The paper explores how gendered work roles, family responsibilities, occupational segregation, and systemic barriers limit women's career advancement and access to professional development. It compares conditions in OECD countries like Canada with the economic south, where outsourcing and weak labor regulations compound gender-based disadvantages. The analysis concludes that meaningful progress requires organizational support, targeted training access, workplace policy reform, and recognition of women's skills and potential.
Women have faced historical changes not only in their rights as employees but also through entering the working world as individuals. Women have taken the opportunity to become educated and fully engaged in the labour market, an act that should allow greater career success. Despite the amount of change and development for women, the "gendering of both work and workers" has had an influence on the ability for women to progress through the workforce and escape the disadvantages associated with the gender gap (Probert, 1999, p. 98). This paper will discuss gender issues as they relate to work and learning for women in Canada and the economic south.
Women have been entering into a wide variety of jobs but still tend to fall below the male average on several different perspectives. Even though there is increased importance on education as the best way to succeed with career opportunities in the labour market, women have not benefitted from earning credentials in ways that should correlate with wages. Gender wage gaps impact women and influence the work they complete and the wage they earn. "The pay gap is even greater for university-educated women," and women compete with men who have decreased education for less than 75% of the pay (Canadian Labour Congress, 2008, p. 1). Men and women do not measure up within the workforce, and "the gender wage gap exists in all OECD countries" (Canadian Labour Congress, 2008, p. 11).
Although the participation from women engaging in the workplace has increased in the OECD, the gender wage gap has continued to stagger since the 1990s, and Canada ranks fifth worst in all OECD countries (Canadian Labour Congress, 2008, p. 1). That is not to say that positive changes have not been made with women's involvement in the workforce, but there are areas to improve in order to shorten the gender gap and promote workplace learning among women. According to Probert (1999), "women have moved into positions of high expertise, but not into positions of power," which suggests that they continue to face gender difference issues and lack of workplace recognition (p. 105). Women have to face the reality that their work will limit their pay and self-regulation, and they work harder to prove that their "qualifications are relevant to traditionally male-dominated positions" more often than men do (University, 2009, p. 71). Resorting to part-time and transient jobs sets the pace for continued inconsistencies with career development, and therefore lack of training, skills building, and workplace learning.
The concept of "gendered work" continues to be prominent in both the workplace and the home. It is not surprising that women would appreciate the same opportunities as men, along with being recognized for the so-called "feminized" roles (Probert, 1999, p. 101). Roles such as caring for children or elderly relatives carry a stigma that women should engage in similar duties within the workforce. "Critical elements of woman's work involved capacities that can be defined as feminine (such as patience, communication, or negotiation skills)," and these are "dismissed as natural female attributes rather than valuable workplace skills, and go unrewarded" (Probert, 1999, p. 102). Regardless of the efforts put forth, women remain "at a disadvantage in their effort to gain a strong attachment to the labour market" (Critoph, 2003, p. 15).
Furthermore, Critoph (2003) suggests that the majority of women are still "concentrated in a few female-dominated sectors related to women's traditional social roles: clerical or other administrative positions, sales and service occupations, nursing and related health occupations and teaching" (p. 15). This reality suggests that women are suited to and deserving of such positions without need for training or career advancement, and it leads to the connection between low wages, single-parent households, and poverty among women. Inequality between men and women results in women being discouraged and not recognized for wanting better-paying jobs, and even worse, they are not deemed deserving of those higher-status positions.
The gendered nature of work is reinforced through how skills are valued and rewarded. When women's contributions are framed as extensions of their "natural" femininity rather than as developed professional competencies, their work is systematically undercompensated. Occupational segregation creates a self-perpetuating cycle in which women remain concentrated in lower-paid sectors, reducing their bargaining power and lifetime earning potential. This pattern persists even when women possess the same or higher qualifications as their male counterparts, indicating that factors beyond individual human capital determine career outcomes.
As an extension of the responsibility of caring for children and elderly relatives, women are subject to "pay discrimination, low pay, long hours and inflexible work schedules, and lack of access to services like child care and elder care" (Canadian Labour Congress, 2008, p. 3). Because of these responsibilities, women often put their home and family life before their careers, settling for a part-time job or becoming a stay-at-home parent while their partner works (Probert, 1999, p. 55). Probert (1999) suggests that while women's involvement in the labour force has increased, there has not been an "equivalent increase in men's family responsibilities" (p. 102).
For single-parent households, a working mother could be forced into the part-time, low-wage job market. Quality, affordable child care can be difficult to find, and in some cases "the burden of care does not stop women from working, but it pushes them into lower-paid and more insecure jobs" (Canadian Labour Congress, 2008, p. 5). This occurs despite women's interest in "training and in mechanisms that would allow greater recognition of skills and accreditation of training" (Probert, 1999, p. 101). The unequal distribution of unpaid labour creates a wedge between motivation, ability, and interest in career development and workplace learning.
Work-life balance remains a critical challenge for women in the workforce. The assumption that caregiving is primarily a women's responsibility persists across societies and organizations, even as women's labor market participation has become normative. This mismatch between women's increased economic participation and unchanged domestic expectations creates time poverty that directly undermines career advancement. Without systemic changes to work schedules, access to affordable care, and shared family responsibility, individual women cannot overcome structural barriers through effort alone.
"Women receive fewer training hours and lack progressive development opportunities"
"Outsourcing and weak regulations intensify exploitation of young women workers"
In an attempt to address the substantial inequalities that occur in less economically developed countries, "parent company compliance" is an auditing practice that includes companies' involvement in monitoring "working conditions and their suppliers" (University, 2009, p. 77). Countries such as Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand, and China are subject to improved working conditions under such regulations in an attempt to support workplace learning, learning organizations, and quality work (University, 2009, p. 77). Targeting gender disadvantages and worker inequality are key attributes to begin the support and implementation of workplace learning and career development.
The global economy is continuously changing, which will require consistent training and development to meet organizations' competitive advantage. Those who are interested and motivated to establish or strengthen their skills should be capable of doing so, regardless of gender and social status. Meaningful progress toward gender equity in work and learning requires systemic solutions that address wage discrimination, occupational segregation, unequal family responsibilities, barriers to training access, and weak labor protections in developing economies.
You’re 67% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.