Genetic and Environmental Determinants of Happiness
This paper examines the genetic and environmental factors that determine individual happiness, drawing on twin studies, psychological research, and behavioral science. It argues that while genetic predispositions toward happiness are real and measurable, environmental factors — particularly the quality of relationships with family and friends — can override hereditary limitations. The paper also surveys additional pathways to well-being, including balanced diet, regular exercise, mindfulness meditation, and cognitive therapy. The concept of locus of control is introduced to explain why some individuals are more proactive in pursuing happiness than others. Ultimately, the paper concludes that modern science has expanded the range of choices available for cultivating happiness, diminishing the determinative role of genetics.
- Nature vs. Nurture and the Happiness Debate: Framing genetics and environment as complementary influences
- Genetic Influences: Being Inclined to Feel Happy: Twin studies reveal hereditary basis for happiness
- Environmental Influences: Nurturing Happiness Through Relationships: Family and friend relationships as the strongest happiness factor
- Lifestyle and Behavioral Pathways to Happiness: Diet, exercise, and meditation as happiness interventions
- Locus of Control and the Psychology of Happiness: Internal vs. external control orientation predicts well-being
- Conclusion: Genetics, Choice, and the Happiness Playing Field: Science expands options, reducing genetic determinism in happiness
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It balances competing explanations — genetic and environmental — without dismissing either, reflecting the current scientific consensus that both contribute to well-being.
- Each claim is grounded in specific cited research, including twin studies, UNICEF survey data, and peer-reviewed psychology journals, lending the argument credibility and academic weight.
- The paper moves logically from the least actionable factor (genetics) to the most actionable ones (diet, exercise, therapy), giving the reader a practical takeaway alongside the theoretical framework.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective synthesis of multiple research sources around a single organizing question. Rather than summarizing each study in isolation, the author weaves them together to build a cumulative argument: genetic predispositions exist, but environmental choices — especially relationships and behavioral habits — can functionally override them. The introduction of locus of control as a bridging psychological concept is a strong example of using theory to unify otherwise disparate empirical findings.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief conceptual framing of the nature vs. nurture debate, then moves through genetic evidence (twin studies), relational and lifestyle factors, and finally the psychological mechanism of locus of control. The conclusion synthesizes all strands and ends on a provocative note about artists and poets, showing awareness that not everyone chooses to maximize happiness — a nuanced closing move that elevates the paper beyond a simple self-help argument.
Nature vs. Nurture and the Happiness Debate
Nature vs. nurture is a framework for contrasting the genetic and environmental contributions to an individual's personality, disposition, and behavioral repertoire (The Open University, 2007, p. 104). Although the term "nature vs. nurture debate" is still used today, it is no longer much of a debate. Countless genetic and behavioral studies have shown that both influence human behavior to varying degrees, and that the interactions between genetic and environmental determinants of behavior can be quite complex.
Genetic Influences: Being Inclined to Feel Happy
Consider the sensation of happiness. Studies with identical twins have shown that when happiness is frequently experienced by one member of a twin pair, the other member is more likely to feel happy as well (Layard, 2005, p. 235). This finding suggests that our propensity to feel happiness is at least in part determined by our ancestral gene pool, and that some people will feel happy with less effort, while others will have to work a little harder to find happiness.
Environmental Influences: Nurturing Happiness Through Relationships
Much more attention has been paid to the role that the environment plays in determining how happy we are. This makes intuitive sense, because we currently do not have the tools necessary for altering our genetic material in order to increase our chances of feeling happy. That leaves us one primary option if we wish to experience more happiness: we need to be proactive about altering our internal and external environments in ways that encourage a sense of well-being.
According to Layard (2005), the factor having the biggest influence on how happy we feel is the quality of our relationships with family members and friends — so much so that it may outweigh genetic determinants. This conclusion is supported by a number of studies, including a UNICEF (2007) survey of 21 of the richest countries that ranked UK children at the bottom because their relationships with family members were of poor quality. A study by the Children's Society in the UK produced a similar result, reporting that children identified the most important determinants of happiness as close relationships with family and friends, and feeling loved and supported. Although wealth has long been considered by some a path to happiness, Lane (2000, p. 6) argued that once wealth has increased enough to keep poverty at bay, the most important factor for determining happiness is close relationships with family and friends.
Conclusion: Genetics, Choice, and the Happiness Playing Field
Happiness depends on a number of factors, both genetic and environmental. Genetic determinants of happiness are strong enough to show up in twin studies, but being blessed with close relationships with family and friends can apparently overcome a genetic deficiency toward happiness. Individuals who find themselves unhappy and without close ties to family and friends still have options, such as eating a balanced diet, getting regular exercise, practicing meditation, and pursuing cognitive therapy. While incorporating these personal changes, honest efforts toward establishing and maintaining close relationships can also be undertaken.
Given the number of options available for increasing feelings of happiness, genetics seems to be playing an increasingly minor role as science and ingenuity level the "happiness playing field." Some of us will simply have to work harder at it than others, while some may choose not to do anything and go on living the life that nature has dealt them. The latter choice might be one that artists, writers, poets, or musicians prefer — either consciously or unconsciously — in order to encourage the kind of artistic expression that seems to depend on personal suffering. This may explain why poets appear to live shorter lives on average than the rest of the population. Science has thus given us the option of influencing both how much happiness we experience and how long a life we live.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.