This paper examines the philosophical and psychological concepts of free will and determinism and their relevance to contemporary psychology. It defines free will as the ability to make conscious decisions independent of external forces and determinism as the idea that biological, social, and cognitive factors shape behavior. The paper demonstrates these concepts through specific examples in social psychology (groupthink and the Pygmalion effect), psychological disorders (schizophrenia and depression), and three major psychological theories (Freud's psychoanalytic theory, Skinner's operant conditioning, and Rogers's humanistic approach). Each framework reveals different positions on the spectrum between human autonomy and behavioral determination.
On a philosophical level, having free will means having the ability to make conscious moral decisions. According to Catholic theology, Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden possessed free will and thus deserved punishment for yielding to the temptation to eat from the Tree of Knowledge. This theological example illustrates free will as moral autonomy—the capacity to choose between right and wrong.
Determinism, by contrast, suggests that social, environmental, and biological factors determine an individual's ability to make choices to such a degree that the perception of free choice is an illusion. Philosophical determinists point to the fact that the atoms comprising our bodies are controlled by natural, physical forces utterly beyond our control. From this perspective, human agency is fundamentally constrained by forces we cannot alter.
Social psychologists tend not to take as radical a view of free will and determinism as philosophers do, but they generally fall into one of these two camps when tracing the causes of human social behavior. They recognize that understanding whether behavior stems from individual choice or external constraint has profound implications for how we explain and address human conduct. This tension between autonomy and determination runs through all of psychology.
In support of determinism, the phenomenon of groupthink—the tendency to conform one's perceptions to the opinions of others in the group—underlines humanity's status as social animals. Humans have evolved to rely upon one another to sustain the human race, suggesting that our social conformity is biologically rooted rather than freely chosen. This evolutionary perspective implies that group conformity is determined by our nature rather than by deliberate decision.
In favor of free will, however, research has shown that human beings tend to perform as they are expected to perform. One classic study indicated that children who were treated as gifted—even though they were selected at random—improved their scholastic performance. This Pygmalion effect demonstrates that expectations and beliefs can shape behavior independently of innate ability, suggesting that individuals have the capacity to exceed predetermined constraints when given positive regard and opportunity.
From the point of view of policy creation, the emphasis placed on determinism or freedom of choice is critical. If individuals are biologically and socially determined organisms, there is little that can be altered through education or rehabilitation. Conversely, if people possess meaningful agency, then educational intervention and therapeutic change become viable and ethical pursuits.
Schizophrenia demonstrates the role of biological determinism in psychological disorder. Schizophrenia shows a strong genetic component—it is not entirely chosen, and individuals experiencing delusions may commit crimes while lacking awareness of right and wrong. Because they do not know right from wrong during acute psychotic episodes, they are viewed as legally insane and are seen as lacking the ability to exercise choice or free will in their behavior. The disorder fundamentally compromises the cognitive and volitional capacities necessary for moral agency.
Depression, however, illustrates a more complex relationship between determination and choice. Although depression may result in cognitive impairments and has a genetic component, depressed individuals are generally seen as retaining some degree of free will in choosing to exercise remedies to improve their mental states. Unlike schizophrenia, depression does not typically erase the person's capacity to understand right from wrong or to make basic decisions. This distinction between disorders that eradicate free will and those that constrain but do not eliminate it is crucial for legal and ethical frameworks governing responsibility and treatment.
"Freud, Skinner, and Rogers on autonomy and behavioral causation"
Freud took a highly deterministic view of how the human psyche was constructed. He viewed such complexes as the Oedipus Complex and the Electra Complex as part of universal human development patterns that individuals could not escape. A girl would inevitably suffer penis envy, even if she was raised by a feminist mother and father in a socially empowering environment. She could not choose to ignore negative internal forces that were hard-wired into her psyche.
Similarly, according to Freud, boys all over the world were determined to wish to murder their father and marry their mother. The subconscious and conscious mind were universally present across cultures. The similarity of developmental patterns suggested that human beings were determined rather than free in terms of how they related to others and the freedom they could enjoy as autonomous beings outside of culture. For Freud, the interior psyche and culture together constituted one's fate. Although secular, Freud had a very fatalistic approach to human development. His theory is socially and cognitively, rather than biologically, deterministic—emphasizing that culture and unconscious mental processes shape behavior more than genetics.
Skinner's theory of operant conditioning holds that individual behavior can be shaped by being subjected to a series of negative and positive stimuli. Skinner portrays human and animal organisms as almost totally determined by social forces. Observable behaviors, rather than biologically determined tendencies, are Skinner's focus. Still, his theory is fundamentally socially deterministic.
Humans, much like animals, are subject to the sway of their learning environment. Behaviors are imposed upon the individual through systematic conditioning, and there is a limit to how much the individual can resist these conditioning influences. Skinner even subjected children to conditioning experiments to prove his theory. From this perspective, free will is largely illusory—what appears to be choice is actually the product of prior reinforcement history.
Rogers's theory is predicated upon a belief in human choice and the potential for personal growth. Rogerian therapy is non-directive in its approach, focusing on enabling the individual to maximize self-actualization and establish a sense of control and autonomy over his or her life processes. Unlike Freud and Skinner, Rogers is not interested in creating a theory that proves freedom of the will or determinism in a macro fashion. Rather, he believed that giving individuals a sense of choice was psychologically beneficial.
By not guiding the individual, as is the case in a psychoanalytic approach, Rogerian therapists enable clients to make their own discoveries about themselves and their needs. Only if a person believes in choice and in his or her own freedom is a sense of self-actualization and a positive approach to life realized. Rogers's humanistic framework represents a counterpoint to both Freudian determinism and Skinnerian behaviorism, asserting that human potential is best actualized through recognition of agency and autonomy.
The tension between free will and determinism persists across all domains of psychology. Social psychological phenomena like groupthink and expectancy effects show how both constraint and choice operate in group settings. Psychological disorders like schizophrenia and depression reveal that the capacity for free will exists on a spectrum, compromised by some conditions but preserved in others. And the major psychological theories—psychoanalysis, behaviorism, and humanism—each offer a different answer to the fundamental question of human agency. Understanding this spectrum is essential for developing ethical, effective, and realistic approaches to psychological treatment and social policy.
You’re 93% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.