German Female Factory Workers in the Age of Industrialization
This paper analyzes Ottilie Baader's memoir, written in 1921 and recounting her experiences as a seamstress in Berlin during the 1860s, as a primary source for understanding working-class women's lives in industrializing Germany. Drawing on Baader's account alongside secondary scholarship, the paper examines three interconnected themes: the social and cultural constraints that defined women's roles in nineteenth-century German society; the slow development of unionization among female factory workers and the forces that impeded it; and the transformative effects of the sewing machine on women's labor, autonomy, and domestic responsibilities. The analysis finds that Baader's descriptions align closely with the broader historical literature on gender, labor, and industrial change in nineteenth-century Europe.
- Introduction: Baader's memoir as source on female industrial labor
- Women's Roles in German Society: Gender norms constraining married women's factory work
- Working Conditions and the Rise of Unionization: Deplorable conditions and slow female union growth
- The Invention of the Sewing Machine: Sewing machine's transformative impact on women's labor
- Conclusion: Baader's account corroborated by secondary scholarship
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Consistently pairs primary source evidence from Baader's memoir with corroborating secondary scholarship, demonstrating how memoir-based historical analysis works in practice.
- Maintains a clear organizational logic across three distinct thematic sections, each of which opens with Baader's testimony and then situates it within the wider literature.
- Avoids over-reliance on a single source by drawing on a range of historians and social scientists, strengthening the comparative framework.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates source triangulation: it uses a first-person memoir as its central text and cross-references its claims against multiple secondary sources. This technique shows students how to treat autobiography as historical evidence while remaining alert to its limitations — testing each claim against what other scholars say rather than accepting the memoir uncritically.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a contextual introduction identifying Baader and the memoir, followed by a roadmap paragraph. Three body sections address gender roles, labor conditions and unionization, and the sewing machine's impact, in that order. A brief conclusion synthesizes the degree of alignment between Baader's account and the scholarly literature. Each body section follows the same pattern: Baader's testimony first, secondary sources second, brief synthesis third.
Introduction
Germany is a well-recognized industrial powerhouse in the world today. Its industrial development, like that of many countries in Europe, occurred gradually over the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. This was made possible by the millions of men and women who gave their labor — those who carried the bricks, printed the books, hacked down the coal, sewed the shirts and cuffs and collars, and laid down the railroad ties that facilitated the growth of Germany's industrial sector. Ottilie Baader was one such woman, forced to work as a seamstress in multiple sewing factories in Berlin to support her siblings and ailing father.1 The source selected for this essay is Baader's memoir composed in 1921, in which she details how female workers such as herself were manipulated by Berlin factory owners and how they were forced to work under strenuous conditions at degrading pay, until they finally learned to stand up against gender-based oppression in the workplace.2
Baader provides crucial insight on three core areas: (i) the status of women in German society in the nineteenth century; (ii) the introduction and growth of unionization among female factory workers in Berlin and the broader Europe; and (iii) the effect of the sewing machine on women's lives in the nineteenth century. Literature from various history books and scholarly articles was reviewed to determine what other researchers say about these three areas, and how those views align with or differ from those put forth by Baader in her memoir. The review showed that Baader's descriptions about the role and place of women in German society at the time were in fact consistent with other available information.
The subsequent sections summarize the results of the conducted review. The first section draws comparisons between the descriptions provided by Baader in her memoir and those provided by researchers in relation to the roles and place of men and women in German society. The second section compares Baader's descriptions with those of scholars regarding the working conditions of the working class in the mid-nineteenth century and the spread of unionization among female workers. The final section examines what Baader says about how the invention of the sewing machine affected her life as a woman, set against what the literature says.
Women's Roles in German Society
Baader mentions that women were allowed to work in factories as long as they were unmarried and did not have children. Even when she and her sister were old enough to work for themselves, they had to remain unmarried in order to keep their factory jobs. Baader does not explain why this was so; however, a number of researchers have supported the view that it was because European culture considered the place of women to be in the home.3 According to historians William Duiker and Jackson Spielvogel, working-class organizations believed that allowing married women to take up roles in the workplace would ruin the physical and moral well-being of families, given that women were supposed to stay at home to nurture their children and provide support to their husbands.4
Baader also speaks to the important role that her mother played in supporting the family. As a housewife, she took responsibility for all the domestic chores of the household and at times even assisted with her father's duties. For instance, Baader described how her mother would check on them to ensure everybody had the right clothes for school, and how she assisted her father with family expenses by making and selling filter cloths for the sugar factory.5 Baader herself also played a significant support role in the family, dropping out of school to look after her ailing father and nurturing her brother's children while he was away on duty.6
Baader mentions that the invention of the sewing machine in 1860 opened up opportunities for more women to increase their participation in the sewing industry and earn extra income to pay expenses and support their families. However, their wages were still insufficient, as employers made deductions for wasted thread and broken needles. Women at the factory were also often assigned secondary roles — such as assembly and preparatory tasks — while men handled the primary roles.7 This view is supported by Kramarae and Spender, who argue that women working in European factories were given the lowest pay and the most semi-skilled or unskilled roles for three major reasons.8 First, those roles were seen as extensions of their domestic tasks. Second, women lacked training and skill in operating new technology; as a result, factories were largely reserved for men, who were viewed as the more important workers. Third, it was feared that assigning women roles traditionally meant for men would threaten the positions and superiority of male workers.9
A similar view is held by D. Hafter, who explains how roles were allocated and decisions made in European guild and family workshops in the nineteenth century: the men provided direction and management and made all decisions pertaining to the workshop, while the wife and children were left to perform unskilled, auxiliary duties with no close connection to the production process.10
This mirrors what Baader describes in her memoir during the time she worked at the Schwendy Wool Factory. The boss would make them work continuously by inserting a night shift between Friday and Saturday; yet Baader and her female colleagues were not consulted when any such decisions were being made. Their male foreman, on the other hand, was given a hearing and his views taken into consideration. The Friday evening to Saturday morning shift was ultimately removed after he intervened on Baader's and her colleagues' behalf, arguing that the work was too much for decent girls.11
The role of women in factories, however, continued to expand over the course of the century, and their position in guild workshops and factories became more prominent.12 Baader mentions in her memoir that with the invention of the sewing machine in the 1860s, more and more women began to be employed in sewing roles, as opposed to being confined to preparatory roles as had been the case in the eighteenth century and first half of the nineteenth century.13 Hafter notes that as the century progressed, women were able to establish their own trades, become bosses of guilds, and even achieve the status of masters in textile crafts.14 Their legal status improved considerably in the second half of the nineteenth century.15
Conclusion
Evidently, Baader's text aligns with the descriptions provided by other researchers, particularly in regard to the status of women in European society, unionization among working women in Europe, and the effect of the sewing machine on women's lives. Baader demonstrates how women were allocated secondary roles in the industrial sphere, reflecting their subordinate position relative to their male counterparts, and how this status contributed to slow union activity among working women. The author agrees with other scholars that ignorance and lack of awareness played a role in the sluggish growth of union activity in Europe during the Industrial Revolution. She further agrees that the invention of the sewing machine had a transformative impact on the lives of women in the sewing industry. Baader's viewpoints, therefore, align to a significant degree with those put forth by other scholars in this area of study.
Bibliography
Baader, Ottilie. Memoir, 1860s. In Alfred Kelley, ed. The German Workers: Working-Class Autobiographies from the Age of Industrialization. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, 1987, pp. 64–74.
Bausum, Dolores. Threading Time: A Cultural History of Threadwork. Fort Worth, TX: TCU Press, 2001.
Brunvard, Harold, ed. American Folklore: An Encyclopedia. New York, NY: Routledge, 2006.
Duiker, William, and Jackson Spielvogel. The Essential World History, Volume 2. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning, 2010.
Elson, Diane, and Ruth Pearson. "Nimble Fingers Make Cheap Workers: An Analysis of Women's Employment in Third World Export Manufacturing." Feminist Review 20, no. 6 (1981): 87–107.
Hadjiafxendi, Kyriaki, and Patricia Zakreski. Crafting the Woman Professional in the Long Nineteenth Century. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2003.
Hafter, Daryl. European Women and Preindustrial Craft. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1995.
Kramarae, Cheris, and Dale Spender. Routledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and Knowledge. Oxon, UK: Routledge, 2004.
Simonton, Deborah. A History of European Women's Work: 1700 to the Present. London, UK: Routledge, 2002.
Simpson, William, and Martin Jones. Europe: 1783–1914. Oxon, UK: Routledge, 2000.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.