Skip to main content
Essay Undergraduate 2,221 words

Germany v. Italy at the ICJ: Sovereign Immunity & War Crimes

~12 min read 5 sections Law · International Law
Abstract

This paper addresses five interconnected questions in public international law through a structured issue-rule-application-conclusion (IRAC) format. It analyzes Germany's April 2022 application to the International Court of Justice against Italy concerning jurisdictional immunities and measures of constraint against German state-owned property. Additional questions examine whether Italy could bring a claim on behalf of nationals harmed by internationally wrongful acts, whether Germany could lawfully invade Italy and whether Italy could mount a preemptive attack, the conditions under which the International Criminal Court could prosecute war crimes arising from a hypothetical armed conflict between the two states, and the broader diplomatic and systemic role that ICJ proceedings play in facilitating peaceful settlement of international disputes.

Key Takeaways
  • Germany's Basis for ICJ Jurisdiction Over Sovereign Immunity: Germany's April 2022 ICJ application against Italy over sovereign immunity
  • Italy's Right to Bring Claims for Internationally Wrongful Acts: Italy's standing to claim on behalf of nationals wronged by Germany
  • Invasion Rights, Preemptive Force, and the UN Charter: UN Charter limits on invasion and preemptive self-defense doctrine
  • ICC Jurisdiction and War Crimes Prosecution: ICC authority to prosecute hypothetical Germany-Italy war crimes
  • The ICJ's Role in Promoting Peaceful Settlement of Disputes: ICJ proceedings as catalyst for arbitration and diplomatic resolution
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾

What makes this paper effective

  • Consistent use of the IRAC (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion) framework gives each answer a clear legal structure that mirrors professional legal analysis.
  • The paper grounds each argument in specific primary sources — the ICJ Statute, the UN Charter, the Rome Statute, and ILC reports — lending authority to its conclusions.
  • The author balances doctrinal exposition with practical observation, noting, for example, that the ICC lacks independent enforcement power and must rely on state cooperation or Security Council referral.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates systematic legal issue-spotting: each question is decomposed into a discrete legal problem, a controlling rule is identified and quoted, the rule is applied to the facts, and a conclusion is drawn. This mirrors the approach used in law school exams and legal memos, making it a strong model for applied international law analysis.

Structure breakdown

The paper is organized as five numbered questions, each subdivided into four labeled sections (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion). This parallel structure makes comparisons across questions easy and ensures no analytical step is skipped. A full reference list in APA format anchors every cited authority. The questions escalate in complexity, moving from jurisdictional standing, to state responsibility, to use-of-force doctrine, to criminal accountability, and finally to the systemic role of international adjudication.

Essay 2,221 words

Germany's Basis for ICJ Jurisdiction Over Sovereign Immunity

Issue: Germany's application to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), filed on April 29, 2022, maintained that Italy violated Germany's sovereign immunity when it allowed Italian victims to file claims against Germany in Italian courts for violations of international humanitarian law committed against those victims and/or their relatives during World War II. In support of its claims, the application states in part:

"(1) Italy has violated, and continues to violate, its obligation to respect Germany's sovereign immunity by allowing civil claims to be brought against Germany based on violations of international humanitarian law committed by the German Reich between 1943 and 1945, including, but not limited to, in 25 proceedings, listed in Annex 6 [to the Application], instituted against Germany since the judgment of the Italian Constitutional Court of 22 October 2014.

(2) Italy has violated, and continues to violate, its obligation to respect Germany's sovereign immunity by taking, or threatening to take, measures of constraint against German State-owned properties situated in Italy, including against the [German Archaeological Institute Rome], the [German Cultural Institute Rome], the [German Historical Institute Rome], and the [German School Rome]." (Germany institutes proceedings against Italy, 2022, pp. 1–2)

Rule: Article 41 of the ICJ Statute stipulates that, "In situations of gravity and urgency, the ICJ can indicate or order provisional measures of protection, pursuant to Article 4 of its Statute, so as to prevent or avoid irreparable harm. Such provisional measures, thus endowed with a preventive dimension, have a binding character" (Statute of the International Court of Justice, p. 11).

Application: At some point, claims that originated in wars fought long ago must be regarded as res judicata, even if no relevant statute of limitations is applicable; otherwise, individuals could claim damages from wars dating to antiquity. In this regard, the ICJ ultimately held, in part, that Italy did in fact violate Germany's sovereign immunity under international law by allowing civil claims to be filed against it.

Conclusion: Germany was correct to invoke the jurisdiction of the ICJ in this case and should prevail, given the nearly 80-year period that has elapsed since the violations alleged by Italy occurred.

Will the ICJ declare itself competent to hear this case?

In a previous related case, Germany relied on Article 1 of the European Convention for the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes, dated April 29, 1957 and subsequently ratified by Germany on April 18, 1961 and Italy on January 29, 1960, as the basis for invoking the ICJ's jurisdiction (Jurisdictional Immunities of the State [Germany v. Italy: Greece intervening], 2009). The provisions of Article 1 state in part that, "Disputes shall be brought before the Special Conciliation Commission by means of an application addressed to the President by the two parties acting in agreement or, in default thereof, by one or other of the parties" (p. 1).

Likewise, Article 38 of the ICJ Statute stipulates that the Court, whose function is to decide in accordance with international law such disputes as are submitted to it, shall apply: international conventions, whether general or particular, establishing rules expressly recognized by the contesting states; international custom, as evidence of a general practice accepted as law; and the general principles of law recognized by civilized nations. Therefore, the ICJ will likely accept jurisdiction in this case as well.

4 Sections Hidden · 1,200 words
Italy's Right to Bring Claims for Internationally Wrongful Acts200 words
Issue: Can victims of an internationally wrongful act committed by one country against another country's nationals bring a claim to the ICJ, and if so, what theory of international law is controlling?…
Invasion Rights, Preemptive Force, and the UN Charter340 words
This question addresses two scenarios: (a) whether Germany would have the right to invade Italy in response to Italy's seizure of German-owned property, and (b) whether Italy would have the right to attack Germany before any attack has taken…
ICC Jurisdiction and War Crimes Prosecution370 words
Issue: Can war crimes be prosecuted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) and, if so, what conditions would first need to be met?
The ICJ's Role in Promoting Peaceful Settlement of Disputes290 words
Issue: What role, if any, did Germany's legal action against Italy in the ICJ play in prompting the parties to negotiate in order to facilitate a resolution to their dispute?…

References

Article 1 of the European Convention for the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes. (1957). Council of Europe. European Treaty Series No. 23.

Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice. (n.d.). International Court of Justice. Retrieved from

Germany institutes proceedings against Italy for allegedly failing to respect its jurisdictional immunity as a sovereign State. (2022, April 29). International Court of Justice. Retrieved from

Hannum, H. (2022, February 25). International law says Putin's war against Ukraine is illegal. Does that matter? U.S. News & World Report. Retrieved from

How the Court Works. (2022). International Criminal Court. Retrieved from

ICC History. (2022). International Court of Justice. Retrieved from

Jurisdictional Immunities of the State [Germany v. Italy: Greece intervening]. (2009, December 23). International Court of Justice. Retrieved from

Preemptive War and International Law. (2009, December 5). Project on Government Oversight. Retrieved from

Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts. (2001). International Law Commission. Retrieved from

Wilske, S., Ebert, B. P., Rohner, T., le Lindholm, M., Beisteiner, L., Horne, L., & Edworthy, C. (2021). The view from Europe: What's new in European arbitration? Dispute Resolution Journal, 75(3), 167–186.

Key Concepts in This Paper
Sovereign Immunity ICJ Jurisdiction Internationally Wrongful Acts Preemptive Force Caroline Case Rome Statute War Crimes ICC Enforcement Arbitration UN Charter
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Germany v. Italy at the ICJ: Sovereign Immunity & War Crimes. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/germany-italy-icj-sovereign-immunity-international-law-2177409

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.