Germany's Migrant Crisis: Culture, Law, and Identity
This paper examines Germany's experience during the 2014–2015 European migrant crisis, when the country committed to accepting approximately 800,000 asylum seekers — more than any other EU member state. Drawing on news reporting and academic sources, the paper explores the cultural clash between Germany's Western liberal identity and the predominantly Muslim migrant population, the EU's legal frameworks governing asylum and human rights, Angela Merkel's open-borders policy and the political backlash it generated, and the societal consequences of high-profile incidents such as the Cologne New Year's Eve attacks. The paper ultimately argues that Germany's migrant crisis reflects a broader tension between post-war European idealism and the practical realities of mass migration, national identity, and public safety.
- Introduction: Europe's Migrant Influx and Germany's Role: Overview of 2014–2015 migration wave and Germany's response
- Cultural Tensions and the Clash of Identities: Western and Muslim cultural clash strains German society
- EU Integration, Open Borders, and the Treaty Framework: Treaty history underpinning Merkel's open-borders stance
- Political Fragmentation and the Limits of Idealism: Migration erodes Merkel's support and German political unity
- Legal Frameworks Governing Migrants in Germany: ECHR and asylum law governing migrants' rights in Germany
- Public Opinion, Hate Speech, and the Free Speech Divide: Germans divided over hate speech laws and migrant criticism
- Conclusion: Germany at a Crossroads: Crisis reflects deeper EU tensions around identity and policy
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper synthesizes multiple source types — academic texts, newspaper reporting, and legal documents — to build a multidimensional picture of a complex political crisis.
- It maintains a consistent analytical thread, connecting EU treaty history to on-the-ground social tensions in Germany, showing how abstract policy produces concrete human consequences.
- The inclusion of specific events (the Cologne New Year's Eve attacks, social media crackdowns) grounds abstract arguments in concrete, memorable examples.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of contextual framing: rather than treating the migrant crisis as an isolated event, it situates Germany's response within decades of EU integration history — the Treaty of Rome, the Maastricht Treaty, and the Treaty of Nice — showing how long-standing ideological commitments created the conditions for the current crisis. This technique allows the author to explain policy decisions as the product of institutional logic rather than individual choice.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an overview of the 2014–2015 migration wave before narrowing to Germany's specific experience. It then moves through: cultural and religious tensions, EU legal and treaty frameworks, political consequences for Merkel, applicable human rights law (ECHR), the domestic free-speech debate, and a concluding synthesis. Each section builds on the last, moving from the macro (EU policy) to the micro (individual German citizens' reactions) before returning to a broad conclusion.
Introduction: Europe's Migrant Influx and Germany's Role
From October 2014 to October 2015, European countries received an overwhelming influx of migrants from various nations. The term migrant describes a person who leaves home to seek life in a new country or region. Driven by economic hardship, violence, abuse, and poverty, people migrated toward places perceived as safe havens. The largest share of migrants came from Syria, followed by Afghanistan, Kosovo, Iraq, Albania, Pakistan, Eritrea, Nigeria, and Ukraine. Most of those fleeing their home countries arrived in Europe claiming asylum status.
The Common European Asylum System (CEAS) was established to ensure that the rights of refugees under international law are protected. It set minimum standards and procedures for processing and assessing asylum applications. Of all the European countries, Germany received the most migrants and asylum requests, and it proved the most welcoming. German authorities committed to accepting 800,000 migrants in 2015 alone. German officials maintained that they were doing all that they could do morally — nothing more, nothing less. In response to arson attacks on migrant hostels and muggings, President Joachim Gauck called for the full use of law enforcement against anyone using violence toward new arrivals.
This paper examines how Germans and migrants are coexisting, how officials have created laws to address the crisis, and why German officials made the decision to accept and host so many migrants.
Cultural Tensions and the Clash of Identities
That tensions exist between Germans and migrants should come as no surprise. Germany has long been a nation defined by its own Germanic heritage, beliefs, and ideals. The arrival of nearly one million Muslim migrants in a single year created the conditions for a profound culture clash between Western Christian liberalism and Middle Eastern orthodox and sectarian Islam. As news of violence on both sides spread, questions arose about whether this inflow of migrants was a morally sound course of action.
Turner (2016) of The Wall Street Journal reports that public support for Angela Merkel and her open-borders policy began to erode as migrant attacks, rapes, and sexual assaults became more widely reported (Kern, 2016). What this means is that the European Union's ideal of a united Europe risked collapsing under the strain of migrant inflows, as countries like Germany began to consider closing their borders in order to protect both their inhabitants and their national identity.
Germany's position in the EU as a major leader is now being tested. The EU has sought to present itself as a legitimate governing body by adhering to values stated in Article I-2 of its constitution: "The Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, liberty, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights" (Elgström & Smith, 2006, p. 69). Such ideals are generally embraced by Western nations, but they are rooted in an evolution of Western thought that grew out of the liberal attitudes of the Enlightenment. As Hughes (2009) indicates, these same values are often ambiguously upheld by EU member-state leaders when conflicts of interest emerge — as can be seen in the case of Germany.
References
Bagnai, A., Granville, B., & Soy, A. (2015). The economic consequences of Greece. Project Syndicate. Retrieved from http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/greece-eurozone-breakup-by-alberto-bagnai-et-al-2015-02
BBC News. (2016). Cologne attacks: Merkel proposes tougher migrant laws. BBC. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-35271171
Elgström, O., & Smith, M. (2006). The European Union's roles in international politics: Concepts and analysis. Routledge.
Faiola, A. (2016). Germany springs to action over hate speech against migrants. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/germany-springs-to-action-over-hate-speech-against-migrants/2016/01/06/6031218e-b315-11e5-8abc-d09392edc612_story.html
Hughes, J. (2009). Praying for peace: Comparing the EU's role in the conflicts in Northern Ireland and Kosovo. Ethnopolitics, 8(3–4), 287–306.
Kern, S. (2016). Germany: Migrant rape crisis worsens. Gatestone Institute International Policy Council. Retrieved from http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/7557/germany-rape-migrants-crisis
Phinnemore, D. (2007). Towards European Union. In M. Cini (Ed.), European Union politics. Oxford University Press.
Thym, D. (2008). Respect for private and family life under Article 8 ECHR in immigration cases: A human right to regularize illegal stay? International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 57(1), 87–112.
Turner, Z. (2016). German welcome for migrants cools, eroding Angela Merkel's standing. The Wall Street Journal.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.