This paper examines two interconnected aspects of workplace training. The first section draws on Sensenig's (2011) "Sphere of Influence" to explore the cultural competencies trainers need in a globalized economy, including relationship-building across cultures, awareness of face-saving norms in Asia and the Middle East, and adapting to different learning styles and classroom expectations. The second section outlines a systematic approach to identifying and closing workplace safety performance gaps in industrial settings, covering needs assessment surveys, employee involvement, knowledge and skills alignment, and the development of effective training materials and best practices.
Projects and organizations in an increasingly globalized economy will require trainers who are able to build strong, trusting relationships across cultural lines in a wide variety of settings. According to Kevin J. Sensenig's "Sphere of Influence" (American Society for Training and Development, February 2011), this requires good listening skills, encouraging people to talk about themselves and share their opinions freely, and establishing "successful relationships in person or via technology" (Sensenig 2011). Trainers should learn to express sympathy for the opinions of others and foster cooperation and teamwork within diverse work groups. Understanding these dynamics is increasingly recognized as essential in cross-cultural communication and professional development.
In Asia, trainers should be aware of the importance of saving face in group settings and of calling attention to mistakes indirectly. Asian and European cultures may regard trainers who smile too frequently or too easily as "artificial and insincere" (Sensenig 2011). Titles, age, and experience are highly significant in Asia and the Middle East in determining status; older and more senior trainers are automatically regarded as possessing greater wisdom and ability.
In these cultures, junior members will not publicly criticize or disagree with team leaders. Instead, they will "defer to the boss or team leader" and refuse to express opinions unless asked directly (Sensenig 2011). Trainers must therefore listen carefully for the intent and deeper meaning behind statements rather than relying solely on what is said explicitly. Furthermore, when conducting evaluations, these more deferential and hierarchical cultures tend not to rate any individual in the group too high or too low. Any needs analysis performed in such contexts must be based on "a thorough understanding of the cultural issues" in order to be effective (Sensenig 2011).
"Rote learning, formality, and trainer-as-expert norms"
When identifying a performance gap — such as deficiencies in workplace safety within an industrial setting — the first step is to determine what gaps currently exist and how they can be bridged. This begins with carrying out a thorough needs assessment, then determining how the resulting information will be used, reported, and applied. Those affected by the problem, such as plant employees working in potentially hazardous environments, must be involved in the planning and implementation of any training designed to improve workplace safety.
This training should address both what employees should avoid doing and what the organization expects them to do, with the ultimate goal of achieving a 100% safety record and preventing all accidents and injuries. New employees in particular must be trained in the correct knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary to ensure workplace safety. It is equally important to identify the gaps between what employees are expected to do and what is actually being done in practice. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration emphasizes that effective safety training must be tailored to the specific hazards and needs of each workplace.
"Survey design, data analysis, and best practices development"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.