Skip to main content
Essay Undergraduate 1,395 words

God's Activity in the Lives of Mary Rowlandson and Ben Franklin

~7 min read 6 sections Literature · American Literature
Abstract

This essay examines how two prominent colonial-era figures—Mary Rowlandson and Benjamin Franklin—each recognized and responded to what they understood as God's active presence in their lives. Drawing on Rowlandson's captivity narrative and Franklin's autobiography, the paper argues that neither figure demanded that God prove himself through favorable circumstances. Instead, both interpreted hardship and prosperity alike as evidence of divine providence. Rowlandson found God's protection even in massacre and captivity, while Franklin attributed his worldly success and moral development to God's guiding hand. Together, their testimonies illustrate a colonial framework of faith in which trust in God precedes—and shapes—the interpretation of life's events.

Key Takeaways
  • Introduction: Recognizing God's Hand in Everyday Life: Colonial faith enabled both figures to see God's activity
  • Mary Rowlandson: Faith Amid Captivity and Slaughter: Rowlandson finds divine protection even during massacre
  • The Comfort of Scripture in Suffering: Scripture sustains Rowlandson through captivity's trials
  • Benjamin Franklin: Providence in Prosperity: Franklin attributes success and morality to God's guidance
  • Shared Faith: Seeing God in All Circumstances: Both figures interpret all events through providential faith
  • Conclusion: Living Worthy of Divine Grace: Faith leads both to lives of gratitude and moral responsibility
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾

What makes this paper effective

  • The comparative structure works well: placing Rowlandson's suffering against Franklin's prosperity sharpens the central claim that faith, not circumstance, determines how God's activity is perceived.
  • Direct quotations from primary sources are used effectively to ground interpretive claims in the authors' own words rather than paraphrase alone.
  • The paper maintains a consistent thematic thread — that neither figure imposed preconditions on God — which gives the argument focus and coherence throughout.

Key academic technique demonstrated

This paper demonstrates comparative textual analysis of two primary sources. Rather than treating each text in isolation, the writer builds an argument that spans both works, using contrasting biographical contexts (captivity vs. success) to reinforce a single unified claim about colonial religious perception. This technique shows how juxtaposition can strengthen an interpretive thesis.

Structure breakdown

The essay opens with a general claim about recognizing divine providence, then devotes a section each to Rowlandson and Franklin, quoting and analyzing key passages from their writings. A final section synthesizes both figures under the shared theme of faith-based perception. The conclusion ties together moral responsibility and gratitude as the natural response to perceived divine grace.

Essay 1,395 words

Introduction: Recognizing God's Hand in Everyday Life

How many people search for evidence of God's activity in their lives and never find it? Yet in the lives of Mary Rowlandson and Benjamin Franklin, both figures recognized the working of the Almighty in their everyday circumstances. Perhaps they did not look for God to prove himself to them; instead, they simply acknowledged that God is always at work. Perhaps it was their colonial upbringing — which emphasized that God is active in the lives of his children — that taught them to see the hand of God in ordinary situations.

What can be said with a measure of certainty is that neither of them held a predetermined list of what they expected God to do for them. Franklin recognized God's hand in protection and providential care throughout a lifetime that grew from one success to the next. Rowlandson acknowledged God's hand in the hardships that became her life after being taken captive by Native Americans from a colonial settlement. In both cases, Mary and Ben did not select their circumstances as the measure of God's provision. Rather, their trust in his care allowed them to see that God is always at work in the lives of his children.

5 Sections Hidden · 870 words
Mary Rowlandson: Faith Amid Captivity and Slaughter310 words
Mary Rowlandson lived during the colonial period in a frontier settlement — a community of 37 people who applied their wills and labor to the task of carving a new life from the forest. But colonial settlements were not safe places. As colonists pushed into…
The Comfort of Scripture in Suffering120 words
Mary's accounts show how difficult it was to watch friends and family stripped and torn as sheep set upon by wolves. Her faith did not insulate her from terror or personal grief,…
Benjamin Franklin: Providence in Prosperity200 words
Benjamin Franklin also lived a life in which he recognized God's hand at work around him. His circumstances were the opposite of Mary's: he was raised in…
Shared Faith: Seeing God in All Circumstances150 words
Both Mary and Ben would have agreed on the reality that God was active in their lives. That they were raised in faith did not make this a…
Conclusion: Living Worthy of Divine Grace90 words
It was each person's responsibility to live up to the grace of God which had acted in their lives, rather than demand that God's grace conform to human expectations. By faith, both Mary Rowlandson and Benjamin Franklin recognized that God…
Key Concepts in This Paper
Divine Providence Mary Rowlandson Benjamin Franklin Colonial Faith Captivity Narrative Puritan Worldview Hardship and Grace Scripture and Comfort Providential Care Moral Responsibility
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). God's Activity in the Lives of Mary Rowlandson and Ben Franklin. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/gods-activity-rowlandson-franklin-colonial-faith-156105

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.