This paper compares Google Chrome and Microsoft Internet Explorer 10 (IE 10) across four key dimensions: performance, stability, security, and usability. The analysis draws on hands-on browser testing and supporting literature to evaluate how each browser handles multi-tab queries, single-window operations, system stability, security authentication, and general user experience. The paper finds that Chrome outperforms IE 10 in multi-threaded tasks, security configuration, and usability, while IE 10 demonstrates stronger stability and efficiency for single-window operations. Together, the findings suggest that Chrome delivers a more well-rounded browsing experience for the average user.
This analysis compares the performance, stability, security, and usability of Google Chrome and Microsoft Internet Explorer (IE) Version 10. Despite entering the browser market later than Microsoft, Google has been able to create and continually refine Chrome to deliver a superior experience to IE 10.
What is immediately apparent when working with IE 10 relative to Chrome is how much more efficiently Chrome manages multiple simultaneous queries. In one evaluation, three tabs were open at the same time in Chrome. All three queries ran simultaneously and completed faster than a comparable series of queries in IE 10. Google has invested in streamlining Chrome's code, making it possible to support multi-threaded performance across multiple activities or tasks (Arnold, 2009). This advantage was evident across multiple performance evaluations conducted relative to IE 10.
Microsoft's browser is more efficient on single-task queries in a single window, yet it cannot manage the multiple-query approach that Google Chrome can. The Microsoft browser is significantly more streamlined for single-window performance; however, when multiple windows were opened and queries completed simultaneously, the browser stalled for a second or two before proceeding. The IE browser is designed for single operations and uses pre-emptive code to ensure a high degree of stability (Shearman, 2012). IE 10 is clearly designed to prioritize stability over performance, and that design choice is evident from the tests completed.
From a stability standpoint, Microsoft's design efforts have paid off, as IE 10 is significantly more stable. The performance of Google Chrome was sporadic — sometimes working well, but often timing out during single-window sessions on a smartphone and tablet PC. The stability of IE 10 is noticeably better; however, that stability comes at the cost of flexibility, particularly when it comes to keeping multiple tabs open at the same time.
Security is superior in Google Chrome. Chrome offers advanced two-factor authentication and is easier to configure for validation with a smartphone than Microsoft's more complex security authentication process. Google wins the security aspect of this comparison based on both the ease and strength of its security and validation approaches.
Of the two browsers, usability is far superior with Google Chrome. With its personalized taskbar and intuitive tab support, Chrome provides a more streamlined and user-friendly interface. These design features make day-to-day browsing noticeably more convenient than the experience offered by IE 10.
"IE 10 more stable; Chrome sporadic on mobile"
"Chrome leads in security and user experience"
You’re 77% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.