This paper examines two contrasting theories—Galileo's law of gravity and the 2012 apocalypse prediction—to explore how scientific verification distinguishes valid theories from unfounded claims. Using Karl Popper's hypothetico-deductive model and his theory of demarcation, the paper demonstrates that Galileo's rigorous testing methods and reliance on familiar concepts enabled society to accept gravity as real, while the 2012 doomsday theory spread through media amplification without solid empirical support. The essay argues that the channel of transmission and the use of testable methodology are critical factors in determining whether a theory gains credibility in society.
The idea of the force that makes objects fall has haunted mankind for thousands of years before people actually came to understand how the force of gravity functions. Italian scientist Galileo Galilei is responsible for opening people's eyes regarding this theory, as he studied it intensively and discovered that an object falling to the ground has a rate of 9.8 meters per second squared. This made it possible for society to gain a more complex understanding of how the force of gravitation works and the diverse variables that can influence this process.
Considering that many individuals in contemporary society have trouble determining whether some objects are likely to fall faster than others, it would seem that Galileo's theory has not pervaded society entirely. What numerous people tend to ignore when saying that heavier objects fall faster is the fact that Galileo emphasized the gravitational force being the same for all objects in circumstances where there is no air or any other substance that is likely to resist an object's fall (Giancoli 31).
In 2012, a great controversy arose, mainly due to the fact that popular culture promoted a theory regarding how the end of the world would take place on December 21, 2012. Although it was portrayed in a variety of media devices and although this was one of the main reasons it gained so many followers, the theory originates in relatively straightforward texts relating to the Mayan Civilization and its belief that the world would experience the end of a cycle on that particular date.
Although there are obviously many reasons why the world did not end in 2012, it is intriguing to consider this theory and the effect it had on the masses. Even though people were not necessarily influenced significantly as a consequence of this theory, many individuals actually considered the prospect of the world experiencing great change on that date. This makes it possible to understand how individuals in modern society are vulnerable to having their thinking shaped by things they do not have a real understanding of, simply because of how public opinion promotes a certain idea.
When considering the hypothetico-deductive model, each of these two theories can be evaluated as passing or failing a series of trials meant to determine whether it is actually valid.
The theory of gravity originates in Galileo's initial attempt to demonstrate that all objects accelerate at the same speed as a consequence of the force of gravitation. Galileo likely acknowledged the fact that most of his contemporaries could not understand how gravitation works and got actively involved in studying the concept. Using his experience as a scientist, Galileo considered various tests he could perform with the purpose of testing his theory.
Even with the fact that the answer to the question "What makes objects fall?" is much more complex than Galileo's contemporaries understood, the Italian scientist managed to raise their awareness concerning this process and encouraged society as a whole to engage in a journey of learning more about it.
While irrational in the eyes of many, the theory regarding how the world would end in 2012 is actually quite valid when considering a series of concepts. The fact that society as a whole is familiarized with the thorough astronomical discoveries that the Mayans are responsible for makes it difficult for someone not to express interest in their predictions. The Mayan society is also known for considering spiritual values to be especially important.
In addition to studies regarding Mayan cultural values and the likelihood for the community's predictions to be valid, the media world played an active role in bombarding the population with ideas meant to have people accept information concerning Mayan predictions as being real. The end of the world occurring in 2012 was, in reality, a vicious cycle: experts interpreting Mayan predictions, the media world exaggerating these respective predictions, and the masses supporting both camps while also demanding more information concerning the event.
"Distinguishing verifiable science from unfalsifiable popular claims"
"How methodology and communication shape theory credibility"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.