Hazing on College Campuses: The Case for Enforcement
This paper reviews the literature on hazing practices at American colleges and universities, arguing that existing criminal laws against hazing must be more rigorously enforced. It traces hazing from its historical roots in antiquity through its current near-ubiquitous presence across fraternity, sorority, athletic, and other campus organizations. The paper presents both the commonly cited justifications for hazing — such as tradition, group bonding, and proving commitment — and the substantial arguments against it, including physical danger, criminal liability, and institutional harm. The conclusion calls on college administrators and the public to adopt a zero-tolerance stance and demand consistent enforcement of anti-hazing statutes.
- Introduction: Thesis: enforce criminal anti-hazing laws on campuses
- Background and Current State of College-Based Hazing in the U.S.: Prevalence, scope, and underreporting of campus hazing
- Arguments in Support of Hazing: Tradition, bonding, and commitment as hazing justifications
- Arguments Against Hazing: Hazing as criminal assault and institutional failure
- Conclusion: Call for zero-tolerance and full enforcement of laws
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper uses a clear, balanced structure — presenting pro-hazing arguments before systematically dismantling them — which strengthens its overall persuasive case.
- It grounds claims in peer-reviewed research and named sources (Campo et al., Reid et al., Nuwer), lending academic credibility to a topic often treated anecdotally.
- The historical contextualization — tracing hazing from tribal initiation rites to modern Greek life — effectively frames hazing as a deep-rooted cultural phenomenon rather than a simple disciplinary problem.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates literature-based argumentation: rather than relying on personal opinion or a single case study, it synthesizes multiple sources to build a policy argument. This technique is especially effective in advocacy writing, where the strength of evidence directly supports the strength of the call to action.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a classical five-section argumentative structure: an introduction that states the thesis, a background section establishing scope and prevalence, a section presenting the opposing view fairly, a rebuttal section advancing the paper's core argument, and a conclusion calling for concrete action. This symmetrical structure makes the argument easy to follow and evaluate.
Introduction
Hazing rituals of varying types and severity date to antiquity, but their practice has become institutionalized to the extent that some fraternities continue to risk their charters by forcing applicants to engage in potentially lethal activities — most especially the overconsumption of alcohol. Hazing on college campuses is a longstanding tradition across America, but the practice has come under increasing scrutiny in recent years as young, aspiring fraternity pledges die as a result of extreme initiation rites.1 In fact, 44 states currently have some type of law that makes specifically defined hazing a criminal offense, but these laws frequently go unenforced.
The purpose of this paper is to provide a review of the relevant literature to develop the argument that current criminal laws concerning hazing should be more rigorously enforced at all American colleges and universities. Following this review, the paper provides a summary of the research and an analysis of the implications of criminalizing hazing on American college and university campuses in the conclusion.
Bibliography
Campo, Shelly, Gretchen Poulos, and John W. Sipple. "Prevalence and Profiling: Hazing Among College Students and Points of Intervention." American Journal of Health Behavior 29, no. 2 (March 1, 2005): 137–49.
"Dangers and Impacts of College Hazing: Research Roundup." The Journalist's Resource. https://journalistsresource.org/politics-and-government/problems-college-hazing-research/.
"Definition and Examples of Hazing." [University]. Available:
"Hazing Statistics." [University]. 2022. Available:
Keller, Tony. "No Greater Love." Maclean's 118, no. 44 (October 31, 2005): 38–39.
Nuwer, Hank. Wrongs of Passage: Fraternities, Sororities, Hazing, and Binge Drinking. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999.
Nuwer, Hank. Hazing: Destroying Young Lives. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2018.
Reid, Gerald M., Melissa K. Holt, Erika D. Felix, and Jennifer Greif Green. "Perceived Consequences of Hazing Exposure during the First Year of College: Associations with Childhood Victimization." Journal of American College Health 67, no. 5 (July 2019): 402–9.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.