Health-Promoting Lifestyle of University Students in Saudi Arabia
This cross-sectional study assessed health-promoting lifestyle behaviors among 1,656 university students in Saudi Arabia, comparing students enrolled in health colleges with those in non-health colleges. Using the Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP-II) instrument, the study examined three key dimensions: health responsibility, physical activity, and nutrition. Results revealed significant differences between the two college groups in health responsibility and certain physical activity and dietary behaviors. Male students showed greater engagement in physical activity, while female students demonstrated more concern for nutrition. The study highlights the need for targeted health promotion programs within university settings to foster healthier habits among Saudi young adults.
- Introduction: Background on lifestyle, health risks, and study aims
- Review of Related Literature: Prior studies on student lifestyle in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia
- Results: Demographics, health responsibility, activity, and nutrition findings
- Discussion: Interpretation of findings against prior literature and cultural context
- Conclusion: Recommendations for university health promotion programs
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper clearly frames its research purpose by identifying gaps in prior studies, particularly following up on Al-Kandari and Vidal (2007) and Farghaly et al. (2007), giving the study a well-situated rationale.
- Results are organized around three distinct HPLP-II subscales — health responsibility, physical activity, and nutrition — providing a systematic and replicable analytical structure.
- The discussion section contextualizes findings within cultural factors specific to Saudi Arabia, such as restrictions on female physical activity, which adds analytical depth beyond mere data reporting.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates effective use of comparative cross-sectional analysis, contrasting outcomes between two distinct student populations (health college vs. non-health college students) using chi-square tests and multivariate models. By anchoring each finding in prior literature, the authors show how empirical results can build incrementally on existing scholarship rather than standing in isolation.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a conventional IMRaD structure: an introduction that establishes context and research purpose, a targeted literature review of closely related studies, a results section organized by HPLP-II subscale, a discussion that interprets findings against prior research, and a conclusion that proposes actionable health promotion strategies. Limitations are addressed honestly within the discussion, strengthening the paper's academic credibility.
Introduction
A health-promoting lifestyle is an important determinant of health status and is recognized as a major factor in the maintenance and improvement of health (Mirghafourvand et al., 2015). Lifestyle factors such as diet, physical activity, and sleep are widely perceived as modifiable issues that impact a person's health (Garcia-Toro et al., 2012). During the transition from adolescence to adulthood, students at the college level often experience unhealthy changes in lifestyle. A variety of lifestyle and health-related habits emerge at this stage, including poor diet leading to malnutrition or obesity, smoking, alcohol consumption, and reduced physical activity (Butler et al., 2004; Wengreen & Moncur, 2009). These unhealthy lifestyles have become increasingly prevalent among college students in recent years (Keating et al., 2005; Lund et al., 2010). Unfavorable changes in lifestyle have been shown to cause a range of health problems including cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, overweight, metabolic diseases, joint and skeletal problems, and depression (Bourre, 2006; Sarbadhikari & Saha, 2006). However, the existing evidence on the associations between these lifestyle factors and depression remains somewhat inconsistent (Averina et al., 2005; Demura & Sato, 2003; Song et al., 2012).
Many college students are living away from home for the first time, either in student housing or in nearby communities. They are faced with new responsibility for their personal health, lifestyle, and behavior. Young adults develop behaviors during this period that may remain part of their lifestyle into adulthood or that may jeopardize their health in later life. These behaviors include assuming responsibility for personal health, participating in physical activities, and acquiring good nutritional habits (Polat et al., 2015). University students occupy a dynamic transition period of growth and development that bridges adolescence and adulthood. This period is marked by rapid changes in the body, mind, and social relationships (WHO, 1977). At this stage, difficult life conditions and diverse lifestyle patterns within the university environment often lead students to engage in a wide range of unhealthy habits, including inadequate nutritional intake, insufficient rest, and limited exercise (Fujii et al., 1998; Hawks et al., 2003; Werch et al., 2007; Wei et al., 2008).
Several studies have examined the relationships between demographic variables and health-promoting behaviors. However, fewer studies have explored relationships between university year level and health-promoting behaviors. The purpose of this study is to determine whether relationships exist between university students' age, gender, living arrangements, body mass index (BMI), year level, and overall scores on the Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP-II) instrument, specifically regarding three subscales: health responsibility (HR), physical activity (PA), and nutrition (N). The study also aims to identify differences in health-promoting lifestyles between students in health colleges and those in non-health colleges. It is hoped that the results will provide useful information to university administrators and educators for general health education program awareness and health literacy dissemination, and help students adopt healthier lifestyles.
Review of Related Literature
The study by Al-Kandari and Vidal (2007) examined the health-promoting lifestyle profile of 224 nursing students in Kuwait and correlated it with levels of enrollment in nursing courses as well as academic performance. The researchers used Walker's Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II instrument to measure students' lifestyle profiles. Academic performance was assessed using individual and group-level grade point averages. The researchers found significant differences between male and female students regarding their health-promoting lifestyle, physical activity, interpersonal relationships, and stress management techniques. Age, nationality, and marital status also correlated with health-promoting profiles. However, no association was found between health-promoting lifestyles and academic performance. One aim of the present study is to follow up on the findings of Al-Kandari and Vidal (2007) and address any gaps left by their research.
The study by Farghaly, Ghazali, Al-Wabel et al. (2007) focused on the lifestyle habits of school students in Saudi Arabia, specifically examining the role of lifestyle and nutrition on student health. A two-stage random sample selected 767 male and female students across various levels of schooling. Participants completed a questionnaire from which information about weight, height, and body mass index was obtained. The findings showed that students suffering from poor health — typically obesity — were most commonly younger females at lower levels of education. The study indicated that poor health-promotion in student lifestyles can begin at an early age and that schools should do more to understand student lifestyles. The present study aims to build on this understanding so that student health can be more effectively addressed at the university level.
Results
A total of 1,656 students from different colleges were available for analysis. The majority of participants were female (70.4%), while 29.6% were male. Regarding age, 57.4% were 20 years of age or younger, 40.0% were between 21 and 30 years old, 2.4% were between 31 and 40 years old, and only 0.2% were 41 or older. Regarding health status, 50% were of normal weight, 11.1% were underweight, 20.8% were overweight, and 11.3% were obese. Almost all participants came from a traditional family structure (76.1%), while 13.5% had an extended family structure and 10.4% came from single-parent homes. The majority of participants (94.9%) lived with their families; 1.2% lived with friends, 0.9% with relatives, 2.4% in university housing, and 0.3% lived alone. Only 12.8% of students had been diagnosed with a health problem.
Differences in health-promoting lifestyle between non-health and health college students are summarized below. The analysis revealed significant differences between the two groups with respect to health responsibility. Only a small proportion of students in both health (11.5%) and non-health colleges (6%) reported any unusual signs or symptoms to a physician or other health professional. Approximately half of the students in both college types obtained information about and discussed health concerns with health professionals. Nearly half of students sometimes read about or watched television programs on improving their health. Nearly 70% of students in both college types never inspect their body at least monthly for physical changes. Furthermore, the majority of students in both groups do not attend educational programs on health care. A significant difference was found in seeking guidance or counseling, with more students in health colleges reporting this behavior (p = 0.001).
With regard to physical activity and exercise, significant differences were found between health and non-health college students in following a planned exercise program (p = 0.019) and taking part in leisure-time physical activities (p = 0.013). A total of 35.3% of non-health college students and 37.8% of health college students reported exercising vigorously for 20 or more minutes at least three times per week. A significant difference was also found in doing stretching exercises at least three times per week (p = 0.013). However, no significant difference was found in exercising during routine activities (p = 0.899) or in participating in light to moderate physical activity such as sustained walking for 30–40 minutes five or more times per week (p = 0.591).
Regarding nutrition and diet management, significant differences were found between the two groups in eating fruits and meat, poultry, and nuts each day (p = 0.001). The majority of students in both groups do not choose diets low in fat, saturated fat, and cholesterol. Only 6.7% of non-health college students and 7.5% of health college students reported limiting their use of sugar and sugar-containing foods. Approximately 90% of non-health college students consumed 2–3 servings of milk, yogurt, or cheese each day, compared to 71.4% of health college students (p = 0.001). No significant differences were found between the groups in eating breakfast (p = 0.254) or consuming 3–5 servings of vegetables each day (p = 0.231).
The multivariate analysis of factors associated with healthy lifestyle showed that gender, college type, college level, and family structure were significantly correlated with health lifestyle. Male students were more willing to engage in physical activity than female students (p = 0.001). College type was significantly associated with increased likelihood of health responsibility among students. Female students showed greater concern for diet management and nutrition than male students (p = 0.001). College level was significantly correlated with physical activity and exercise (p = 0.001). No significant associations were found for age, place of residence, or GPA with respect to health responsibility, physical activity, or nutrition.
Conclusion
The current study explored the health lifestyles of university students with regard to health responsibility, physical activity, and nutrition. As universities are ideal settings for implementing health promotion programs, planning and implementing such programs — aimed at motivating students to take responsibility for their own health, engage in regular physical activity, and practice healthy dietary habits — is of paramount importance for promoting health and preventing disease. Developing and implementing goal-oriented programs that address health responsibility, physical activity, and nutrition may promote healthier lifestyles among university students. Applications such as "Healthy University" and "Universities Humanizing Health" are also suggested as tools for enhancing student awareness of and engagement with healthy lifestyle practices.
Conflict of interest: The authors certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in this manuscript.
References
Al-Kandari, F., & Vidal, V. L. (2007). Correlation of the health-promoting lifestyle, enrollment level, and academic performance of College of Nursing students in Kuwait. Nursing & Health Sciences, 9(2), 112–119.
Averina, M., Nilssen, O., Brenn, T., Brox, J., Arkhipovsky, V. L., & Kalinin, A. G. (2005). Social and lifestyle determinants of depression, anxiety, sleeping disorders and self-evaluated quality of life in Russia — a population-based study in Arkhangelsk. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 40(7), 511–518.
Bonevski, B., Guillaumier, A., Paul, C., & Walsh, R. (2013). The vocational education setting for health promotion: a survey of students' health risk behaviours and preferences for help. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 24(3), 185–191.
Bourre, J. M. (2006). Effects of nutrients (in food) on the structure and function of the nervous system: update on dietary requirements for brain. Part 1: micronutrients. Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging, 10(5), 377–385.
Butler, S. M., Black, D. R., Blue, C. L., & Gretebeck, R. J. (2004). Change in diet, physical activity, and body weight in female college freshmen. American Journal of Health Behavior, 28, 24–32.
Chen, J., Xiang, H., Jiang, P., Yu, L., Jing, Y., Li, F., et al. (2017). The role of healthy lifestyle in the implementation of regressing suboptimal health status among college students in China: a nested case-control study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14, 240.
Demura, S., & Sato, S. (2003). Relationships between depression, lifestyle and quality of life in the community dwelling elderly: a comparison between gender and age groups. Journal of Physiological Anthropology and Applied Human Science, 22(3), 159–166.
El-Ahmady, S., & El-Wakeel, L. (2017). The effects of nutrition awareness and knowledge on health habits and performance among pharmacy students in Egypt. Journal of Community Health, 42, 213–220.
Farghaly, N. F., Ghazali, B. M., Al-Wabel, H. M., Sadek, A. A., & Abbag, F. I. (2007). Life style and nutrition and their impact on health of Saudi school students in Abha, Southwestern region of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Medical Journal, 28(3), 415–421.
Fujii, T., Ohsawa, I., Nozawa, A., Mori, K., Kagaya, M., Kajioka, T., et al. (1998). The association of physical activity level characteristics and other lifestyle with obesity in Nagoya University alumni, Japan. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 8, 57–62.
Garcia-Toro, M., Roca, M., Monzón, S., Vives, M., Oliván, B., Vicens, E., Salva, J., & Gili, M. (2012). Hygienic-dietary recommendations for major depression treatment: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry, 12, 201.
Hassmen, P., Koivula, N., & Uutela, A. (2000). Physical exercise and psychological well-being: a population study in Finland. Preventive Medicine, 30, 17–25.
Hawks, S. R., Madanat, H. N., Merrill, R. M., Goudy, M. B., & Mitagawa, T. (2003). A cross-cultural analysis of 'motivation for eating' as a potential factor in the emergence of global obesity: Japan and the United States. Health Promotion International, 18, 153–161.
Keating, X. D., Guan, J., Piñero, J. C., & Bridges, D. M. (2005). A meta-analysis of college students' physical activity behaviors. Journal of American College Health, 54(2), 116–125.
Klainin-Yobas, P., He, H.-G., & Lau, Y. (2015). Physical fitness, health behavior and health among nursing students: a descriptive correlational study. Nurse Education Today, 35, 1199–1205.
Leino-Arjas, P., Solovieva, S., Riihimaki, H., Kirjonen, J., & Telama, R. (2004). Leisure time physical activity and strenuousness of work as predictors of physical functioning: a 28-year follow-up of a cohort of industrial employees. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 61, 1032–1038.
Lund, H. G., Reider, B. D., Whiting, A. B., & Prichard, J. R. (2010). Sleep patterns and predictors of disturbed sleep in a large population of college students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 46(2), 124–132.
Mahdipour, N., Shahnazi, H., Hassanzadeh, A., Tabaraie, Y., & Sharifirad, G. (2013). Relationship between various aspects of life style in middle-aged women. Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences, 3, 68–74.
Mehri, A., Solhi, M., Garmaroudi, G., Nadrian, H., & Sighaldeh, S. S. (2016). Health-promoting lifestyle and its determinants among university students in Sabzevar, Iran. International Journal of Preventive Medicine, 7, 65.
Mirghafourvand, M., Baheiraei, A., Nedjat, S., Mohammadi, E., & Charandabi, S. M.-A. (2015). A population-based study of health-promoting behaviors and their predictors in Iranian women of reproductive age. Health Promotion International, 30(3), 586–594.
Mustard, C. A., Vermeulen, M., & Lavis, J. N. (2003). Is position in the occupational hierarchy a determinant of decline in perceived health status? Social Science & Medicine, 57, 2291–2303.
Nacar, M., Baykan, Z., Cetinkaya, F., Arslantas, D., Ozer, A., Coskun, O., et al. (2014). Health-promoting lifestyle behavior in medical students: a multicenter study from Turkey. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 15, 8969–8974.
Park, D.-I., Choi-Kwon, S., & Han, K. (2015). Health behaviors of Korean female nursing students in relation to obesity and osteoporosis. Nursing Outlook, 63(4), 504–511.
Plotnikoff, R. C., Costigan, S. A., Williams, R. L., Hutchesson, M. J., Kennedy, S. G., Robards, S. L., et al. (2015). Effectiveness of interventions targeting physical activity, nutrition and healthy weight for university and college students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12, 45.
Polat, Ü., Özen, Ş., Kahraman, B., & Bostanoğlu, H. (2015). Factors affecting health-promoting behaviors in nursing students at a university in Turkey. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 27(4), 413–419.
Sakamaki, R., Toyama, K., Amamoto, R., Liu, C. J., & Shinfuku, N. (2005). Nutritional knowledge, food habits and health attitude of Chinese university students — a cross-sectional study. Nutrition Journal, 4, 4.
Sarbadhikari, S. N., & Saha, A. K. (2006). Moderate exercise and chronic stress produce counteractive effects on different areas of the brain by acting through various neurotransmitter receptor subtypes: a hypothesis. Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, 3, 33.
Schmidt, S. (2009). Just health responsibility. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35, 21–26.
Song, M. R., Lee, Y. S., Baek, J. D., & Miller, M. (2012). Physical activity status in adults with depression in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005–2006. Public Health Nursing, 29(3), 208–217.
Sousa, P., Gaspar, P., Fonseca, H., Hendricks, C., & Murdaugh, C. (2015). Health-promoting behaviors in adolescence: validation of the Portuguese version of the Adolescent Lifestyle Profile. Jornal de Pediatria, 91(4), 358–365.
Teiji, N. (2008). The integration of school nutrition program into health promotion and prevention of lifestyle-related diseases in Japan. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 17(S1), 349–351.
Von Ah, D., Ebert, S., Ngamvitroj, A., Park, N., & Kang, D. H. (2004). Predictors of health behaviours in college students. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48, 463–474.
Walker, S. N., Sechrist, K. R., & Pender, N. J. (1987). The Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile: development and psychometric characteristics. Nursing Research, 36(2), 76–81.
Walker, S. N., & Hill-Polerecky, D. M. (1996). Psychometric evaluation of the health-promoting lifestyle profile II. Unpublished manuscript, University of Nebraska Medical Center.
Wei, C. N., Harada, K., Ueda, K., Fukumoto, K., Minamoto, K., & Ueda, A. (2012). Assessment of health-promoting lifestyle in Japanese university students. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 17, 222–227.
Wengreen, H. J., & Moncur, C. (2009). Change in diet, physical activity, and body weight among young adults during the transition from high school to college. Nutrition Journal, 8, 32.
Werch, C. E., Bian, H., Moore, M. J., Ames, S., DiClemente, C. C., & Weiler, R. M. (2007). Brief multiple behavior interventions in a college student health care clinic. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 577–585.
West, E. (2014). Television and health responsibility in an age of individualism [Book review]. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(1), 382–383.
World Health Organization. (1977). Coming of age: from facts to action for adolescent sexual and reproductive health. Geneva: WHO.
Wu, S., Xuan, Z., Li, F., Xiao, W., Fu, X., Jiang, P., et al. (2016). Work-recreation balance, health-promoting lifestyles and suboptimal health status in Southern China: a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13, 339.
Yang, S.-C., Lou, Y.-F., & Chiang, C.-H. (2017). The associations among individual factors, eHealth literacy, and health-promoting lifestyles among college students. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(1), e15.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.