Healthcare.gov Contract Failure: A GAO Case Study
This paper examines the government contracting failures behind the troubled 2013 launch of healthcare.gov, drawing on a GAO investigation (GAO-14-694). The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued task orders before key technical requirements were established and relied on cost-reimbursement contracts that removed financial incentives for contractors to control costs or meet deadlines. The resulting cost overruns, schedule slips, and delayed functionality—compounded by inadequate oversight and deferred governance reviews—produced a website that launched without verified performance standards. The paper argues that the technical failure had broader consequences, eroding public trust in the Affordable Care Act itself and underscoring the need for rigorous contract management practices in government technology projects.
- Introduction: The Healthcare.gov Crisis: Overview of the 2013 healthcare.gov launch failure
- CMS Contracting Decisions and Structural Risk: How cost-reimbursement contracts created financial risk
- Cost Overruns, Schedule Slips, and Oversight Gaps: GAO findings on delays and governance failures
- Security, Usability, and Public Relations Fallout: Subcontractor failures and public trust erosion
- Lessons Learned and Recommendations: Best practices needed for future government contracts
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Anchors its analysis in a specific, credible primary source — the GAO report (GAO-14-694) — giving the argument an authoritative evidentiary foundation.
- Connects the technical and contractual failures to real-world consequences, demonstrating an understanding that government contracting breakdowns have political and social dimensions beyond their immediate operational scope.
- Maintains a clear cause-and-effect structure: poor contracting decisions → misaligned incentives → cost and schedule failures → public trust erosion.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses a single in-depth case study to illustrate broader principles of government contract management. By tracing how a specific structural choice — the cost-reimbursement contract — created downstream incentive problems, the paper models how policy analysis moves from observable facts to systemic critique. This is a strong example of using a real-world case to test and apply theoretical frameworks in public administration.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by contextualizing the healthcare.gov launch failure within the policy debate around the ACA, then narrows to the specific contracting decisions made by CMS. It draws directly on GAO findings to document cost overruns and governance failures before addressing the broader usability, security, and public relations consequences. The paper closes with a brief prescriptive recommendation emphasizing best practices and subcontractor oversight — giving it a complete problem-analysis-solution arc appropriate for a graduate-level policy case study.
Introduction: The Healthcare.gov Crisis
One of the most prominent government contracting failures of 2013–2014 was the healthcare.gov crisis. Healthcare.gov, the Internet exchange on which people could purchase healthcare plans on the open market, was largely inoperable during the first months of its existence. The fact that the website's dysfunction was fundamentally the result of a failed government contract is often overlooked, due to the intense focus on the policy debate surrounding the requirement that all American citizens obtain health insurance. A subsequent investigation by the Government Accountability Office examined the contract between the federal government and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the agency charged with designing and overseeing the website.
References
Ineffective planning and oversight practices underscore the need for improved contract management. (2014). GAO-14-694. Retrieved from
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.