This paper analyzes Aberdeen Group's 2006 study, "Automating Healthcare Security," which surveyed 100 U.S.-based healthcare professionals about their use of security technologies to protect patient records. The analysis examines the specific problem the researchers addressed — namely, the challenges healthcare organizations face in achieving HIPAA compliance and protecting patient data — alongside a critique of the study's methodology, its quantitative and qualitative tools, and the benefits and limitations of the research. The paper concludes with recommendations for additional quantitative research to improve the study's validity and reliability.
The intent of this paper is to analyze the article Automating Healthcare Security, published by Aberdeen Group in March 2006, based on a survey of U.S.-based healthcare professionals conducted during that same month. One hundred respondents were interviewed regarding their current and planned use of security technologies for protecting healthcare records. This paper presents a discussion of the specific problem Aberdeen Group researchers were addressing, a critique of their research methodology, and an assessment of both the quantitative and qualitative tools used to complete the study. It is followed by an assessment of the benefits and limitations of the research study itself, and concludes with an analysis of additional types of quantitative research recommended to further enhance the validity and reliability of the findings.
According to many healthcare organizations, the security, privacy, and integrity of patient records represent the biggest challenge from both a process-centric and IT-centric strategic perspective. The requirements that healthcare providers must meet under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) have created a greater sense of urgency around securing and managing patient records with a high degree of confidentiality. The biggest problem many healthcare providers face is redefining their existing manual processes so they can become more efficient in managing patient records.
The problems associated with achieving HIPAA compliance extend into the manually based approaches to managing patient data — approaches first defined in the 1970s and earlier. With the rise in identity theft globally, there has been a significant increase in the theft of patient data and even the identities of patient care providers. This is a major challenge for the healthcare profession to overcome, and it underlies the need for research on how organizations are implementing both healthcare security processes and IT strategies to make patient records more secure.
Aberdeen Group began with a sample of 100 respondents, distributed evenly across the healthcare organizations of Care New England, Denver Health, Catholic Healthcare West, HealthSouth, and New York Presbyterian. The study relied on a questionnaire specifically designed to capture the current practices of these organizations and their awareness of strategies for protecting all forms of patient records and information. The methodology included a series of in-person and telephone interviews, followed by emails containing specific questions about the processes and approaches each organization had used to meet the challenge of keeping medical records safe.
"SPSS, Excel, and open-ended questionnaires"
"Benchmarking strengths and methodological weaknesses"
"Suggestions to improve validity and reliability"
You’re 53% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.