Hills Like White Elephants: Hemingway's Dialogue Technique
This essay analyzes Ernest Hemingway's short story "Hills Like White Elephants," focusing on how Hemingway uses spare, elliptical dialogue as the primary vehicle for plot and character development. The paper examines how the conversation between a man and a girl traveling through Spain gradually reveals a power imbalance, the pressure she faces to undergo an abortion, and the irreparable damage done to their relationship. Drawing on scholarship by Robert Paul Lamb and J. L'Heureux, the essay explores techniques such as repetition, implication, symbolic language, and involuntary self-revelation to show how Hemingway's dialogue both advances the story and exposes the inner lives of his characters.
- Overview of the Story and Its Dialogue-Driven Structure: Plot summary and thesis about dialogue's role
- Symbolic Language and the 'White Elephant' Motif: White elephant metaphor as symbol of false relationship
- Drinking, Autonomy, and the Relationship's Power Dynamic: Drinking motif and the girl's lack of autonomy
- Repetition and the Couple's Emotional Impasse: How repeated phrases mirror emotional deadlock
- Manipulation, Self-Revelation, and the Limits of Silence: Man's manipulation and silence as female resistance
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It grounds every interpretive claim in direct textual evidence, quoting specific lines of dialogue and then unpacking their implications rather than making unsupported assertions.
- It integrates secondary scholarship (Lamb 1996; L'Heureux 2011) smoothly, using critics to frame and reinforce the student's own close readings rather than substituting for them.
- The analysis moves logically from surface features (the white elephant metaphor, drinking) to deeper structural ones (repetition, manipulation, silence), building a coherent argument about Hemingway's technique.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates sustained close reading: the student selects brief, specific quotations from the story and shows how word choice, repetition, and tone carry meaning beyond the literal. Citing Lamb's concept of "involuntary self-revelation" and applying it to the man's contradictory statements is a strong example of using a theoretical framework to illuminate a text.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens with a plot summary and thesis about dialogue's constructive role, then moves through thematic sub-analyses: the white elephant symbolism, the drinking motif and autonomy, the function of repetition, and finally the manipulation embedded in the man's speech. It closes with the observation that silence — not dialogue — is what briefly restores the woman's agency, providing a resonant ending point.
Overview of the Story and Its Dialogue-Driven Structure
Ernest Hemingway's short story "Hills Like White Elephants" is a spare, poetic tale told almost entirely in dialogue. The plot is simple: a man and a girl are traveling through Spain. They are lovers. The girl is pregnant, and the man is pressuring her to have an abortion. By the end of the story, the reader is certain that the girl will go through with it, but the relationship has been permanently soured. This outcome is revealed gradually, over the course of the couple's elliptical conversation. By foregrounding dialogue and keeping description to a minimum, Hemingway brings the lack of communication between the two characters to the forefront of the reader's consciousness.
As L'Heureux (2011) observes, "effective dialogue works by implication. The tone of a comment or the choice of words or the hesitation with which something is said can indicate that beneath the spoken words there is a feeling very different from what the words seem to express." Hemingway's story demonstrates this principle throughout, using what the characters say — and what they conspicuously avoid saying — to carry the full emotional and narrative weight of the work.
Symbolic Language and the 'White Elephant' Motif
The reader is immediately struck by the unusual subject of the man and the girl's first exchange after they order their drinks. "They're lovely hills," the girl says. "They don't really look like white elephants. I just meant the coloring of their skin through the trees." The term white elephant is commonly used as a synonym for something that appears valuable but is ultimately useless or burdensome — and the girl's words temporarily suggest confusion between the simile she uses to describe the hills and the reality before her. Hills, after all, cannot have "skin."
This confusion implies that the relationship between the girl and the man lacks substance and reality. What the girl once believed was a genuine relationship has been revealed to be a kind of performance. "That's all we do, isn't it — look at things and try new drinks?" she says. The emptiness of their lives is further communicated by the symbolic weight of their luggage and the "labels on them from all the hotels where they had spent nights." The couple have evidently traveled widely and spent many nights together, yet they do not truly seem to know one another. The girl's confused comparison of the hills to white elephants thus becomes symbolic of the confusion and miscommunication that define their relationship.
Drinking, Autonomy, and the Relationship's Power Dynamic
The fact that the couple's first actions revolve around drinking suggests a desire to forget rather than confront the reality they inhabit. They engage in seemingly pointless debates — about the hills, about alcohol — and from their very first exchange, the dynamic inherent in the relationship becomes apparent. The girl lacks a sense of autonomy and looks to her partner to make decisions. He wants a drink and coaxes her into ordering the beers he prefers. As Lamb (1996) notes, "although she is perfectly willing to have him make the decisions, whether about drinks or abortions, he needs to believe that she is actually taking part in the decision-making process at the same time as he prevents her from doing so" (p. 469).
Over the course of the story, "he tries to make peace and, for the moment, succeeds. They repeat this sequence — make nice, make quarrel — as the dialogue gradually reveals that what he wants is for her to go through with the abortion he has planned and what she wants is reassurance that, afterward, things will again be like they used to be" (L'Heureux 2011). This too, however, is a kind of lie — something has clearly changed, and whatever emotions once sustained the relationship have dissipated.
References
Hemingway, Ernest. Hills Like White Elephants.
L'Heureux, J. (2011). Talk that walks: How Hemingway's dialogue powers a story. Wall Street Journal.
Lamb, Robert Paul. (1996). Hemingway and the creation of twentieth-century dialogue. Twentieth Century Literature, 42(4), 453–480.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.