Heritage vs. Artifice in Alice Walker's "Everyday Use"
This essay analyzes Alice Walker's short story "Everyday Use" through the lens of cultural authenticity and heritage. It argues that Dee (Wangero), despite her desire to reclaim a Black African identity, mistakes material objects and performative gestures for genuine culture. By contrast, Mama and Maggie represent lived heritage — an emotional, familial connection to their history expressed through everyday practice. Drawing on critics such as Houston Baker, Charlotte Pierce-Baker, Helga Hoel, and Nancy Tuten, the essay examines Dee's name change, her appropriation of household objects, and Mama's decision to award the quilts to Maggie as evidence that authentic culture cannot be constructed or reclaimed through artifice.
- Introduction: Culture as Lived Experience: Thesis: real culture is lived, not performed
- Dee's Name Change and the Illusion of African Identity: Dee's African name signals performative, not genuine, identity
- Heritage Objects and Their True Meaning: Quilts and churn hold family memory, not mere artifact value
- Dee's Desire vs. Mama and Maggie's Understanding: Dee seeks escape; Mama and Maggie possess authentic belonging
- Mama's Judgment and the Meaning of the Quilts: Mama's fair heart affirms Maggie's genuine cultural love
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The essay builds a clear, consistent argument from the opening paragraph through to the conclusion: authentic culture is lived and felt, not performed or constructed, and every body paragraph reinforces this claim with textual evidence.
- The paper integrates secondary scholarship (Baker and Pierce-Baker, Hoel, Tuten) to contextualize its readings without letting criticism overpower the student's own analysis.
- Concrete details — Dee's renamed identity, the butter churn, the quilts' origins in family hands — are used as specific evidence rather than vague references, grounding abstract claims about culture in the story's actual content.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The essay demonstrates textual close reading combined with thematic synthesis. Rather than summarizing plot events, the writer consistently interprets specific details (Dee's African name, her dismissal of Maggie's quilting knowledge, her phrase "it's really a new day for us") as evidence for a larger argument about the difference between performed and authentic cultural identity. This moves the analysis from description to argumentation.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens with a thesis statement that frames the central conflict. It then traces Dee's inauthenticity through two angles — her name change and her treatment of household objects — before addressing the more sympathetic reading of Dee's motivation. The final paragraph resolves the argument by focusing on Mama's role as a fair moral arbiter, returning to the thesis with added nuance. The Works Cited follows MLA format.
Introduction: Culture as Lived Experience
In Alice Walker's "Everyday Use," Dee is searching for cultural authenticity, but in her search she latches onto material possessions — the relics of her family's heritage — believing these objects represent the identity she is after. However, Dee's search is frustrated by her own superficial understanding of what culture truly is: she believes it is a construct that can be concocted overnight, or reclaimed by way of artifice. The reality is that, as the mother demonstrates, culture comes from the heart and its attachment to one's true heritage — which is why Maggie is awarded the quilt coveted by Dee. Maggie has the heart to love it because it comes from her family, and she has the sense to make use of it; Dee wants it only because she believes it represents her ancestral Blackness — beyond that, it means nothing to her.
The mother's role in awarding the quilt to the most deserving daughter reinforces the story's central idea: real culture is lived, whereas fake or superficial culture is merely talked about. Maggie has the real culture of the family; she is genuinely fond of her heritage. Dee is simply posing, attempting to construct a hyper-heritage that extends beyond her immediate family history all the way back to a continent she does not truly know.
Dee's Name Change and the Illusion of African Identity
Walker confirms Dee as a poser when she reveals that Dee's given name comes from a long line of women in the family — she is named after her aunt, who was named for their grandmother, and so on. Yet for Dee, who has learned at college how white culture has oppressed her people, the rejection of her given name is part and parcel of what she is doing: rejecting everything that previously defined her and setting about constructing an authentic African identity, or so she thinks. As Helga Hoel points out, Dee's "African name" — Wangero Leewanika Kemanjo — is inauthentic. It may sound as though it originates in Africa, but it has no more genuine connection to that continent, its people, and their history than the local store down the street. Her new self-applied, self-constructed name only serves to reflect Dee's socio-political rejection of white culture and her white oppressors. It is not a legitimate claim to Blackness, heritage, or true culture, as Dee would like to believe.
Heritage Objects and Their True Meaning
Dee misses the real meaning of heritage and culture when she arrives at the Johnson homestead fresh from college. The objects in the home — such as the quilt and the butter churn — have an everyday, practical use in addition to being items that have been in the family's possession for generations. They tell something of the story of the Johnson family. Dee sees them only as relics or artifacts of Black culture. For Maggie and Mama, however, they represent real memories, and they respect these objects for that reason. Maggie learned to quilt from her grandmother, as Walker points out, and the butter churn was something their uncle carved with his own two hands — that is why these items matter to Maggie and Mama. To Dee, they are like antiques that would look good in her dorm because they symbolize something old and rural, not because they remind her of loved ones she has lost.
Works Cited
Baker, Houston A., and Charlotte Pierce-Baker. "Patches: Quilts and Community in Alice Walker's 'Everyday Use'." The Southern Review, vol. 21, no. 3 (1985): 706.
Hoel, Helga. "Personal Names and Heritage: Alice Walker's 'Everyday Use'." American Studies in Scandinavia, vol. 31, no. 1 (1999): 34–42.
Tuten, Nancy. "Alice Walker's 'Everyday Use'." The Explicator, vol. 51, no. 2 (1993): 125–128.
Walker, Alice. "Everyday Use." nlsd.k12.oh.us.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.