This paper examines the ambiguous legal and regulatory status of homeopathy in the United States and abroad. It traces the historical roots of homeopathic practice, contrasts the lenient stance of the British Medical Journal with the skepticism of the American Medical Association, and analyzes how the FDA regulates homeopathic remedies differently from prescription and over-the-counter drugs. The paper also highlights Pennsylvania's historical role in American homeopathy, discusses federal labeling requirements introduced in 1988, and notes the role of the Council on Homeopathic Education in accrediting training programs. Throughout, it underscores the ongoing concern that patients may substitute unproven homeopathic treatments for evidence-based conventional medicine.
Although its principles were used in ancient and patent medicine for hundreds of years, the practice of homeopathy holds a somewhat tenuous and dubious legal status in the modern age. The homeopathic philosophy of "like cures like" uses substances that are supposed to cause the patient's disease in order to cure it. The practice does not rely on empirical, evidence-based scientific studies to support its claims. Some advocates suggest that homeopathy's foundational principle is not so different from using a killed virus to vaccinate a patient against the flu. However, according to the American Medical Association (AMA): "There is little evidence to confirm the safety or efficacy of most alternative therapies. Much of the information currently known about these therapies makes it clear that many have not been shown to be efficacious" (Homeopathy, 2010, Citizendum).
Homeopathy is more popular abroad, and some physicians use this alternative medicine in concert with conventional, scientifically tested approaches in Europe. The British Medical Society has taken a more lenient view than state or local governments in the United States: "The British Medical Journal in 1991 published a large analysis of homeopathic treatments that were given over the course of 25 years… The study found improvement with homeopathic treatment in most categories of problems" (Homeopathy, 2010, Citizendum). Even in Europe and the UK, however, concerns remain that some patients will substitute homeopathic treatments for conventional medicine and suffer as a result.
Pennsylvania has long been one of the centers of homeopathy in the United States. It was the second state in which a society devoted to the practice of homeopathy was established. The first American school of homeopathy opened in Philadelphia in the 19th century (Schofield, 2001). Today, such schools must be transparent about the legal status of homeopathic medicine: homeopathic treatments are not subject to the same Food and Drug Administration (FDA) scrutiny as conventional medical treatments.
"How FDA oversees homeopathic products differently"
"Federal labeling rules and accreditation standards"
You’re 55% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.