HR Hiring, Negligent Hire Risk, and Second-Chance Policies
This paper examines the dual responsibilities human resources professionals face when hiring applicants with criminal backgrounds. On one hand, HR must protect the organization from negligent hiring risks — avoiding candidates who may pose a threat to company assets, staff, or reputation. On the other hand, HR must comply with EEOC regulations, avoid discriminatory practices, and honor corporate social responsibility commitments to the broader community. The paper argues that a balanced approach — including structured second-chance employment programs, consideration of offense recency and severity, and use of government incentives — can allow organizations to manage risk while promoting fairness, legal compliance, and community engagement.
- Introduction: HR's Dual Hiring Responsibility: HR must balance organizational and community interests
- Negligent Hiring and Organizational Risk: Risk management rationale for screening applicants
- Community Responsibility and Second-Chance Employment: Businesses owe second chances to reformed applicants
- Balancing Cognitive Dissonance Through Balanced Policy: Structured programs resolve HR's competing obligations
- Legal Exposure and Corporate Social Responsibility: Discrimination risk and reputational harm from exclusion
- Conclusion: A Balanced Approach to Hiring: Multi-factor framework guides fair hiring decisions
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Frames a genuine policy tension — negligent hiring risk versus anti-discrimination duty — and works toward a concrete resolution rather than simply describing both sides.
- Applies the concept of cognitive dissonance to an HR decision-making context, demonstrating interdisciplinary thinking by drawing on organizational behavior and psychology.
- Grounds recommendations in real regulatory frameworks (EEOC guidelines) and practical considerations (recency and severity of offenses, government incentives), giving the argument operational credibility.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses a problem–tension–resolution structure. It identifies a conflict between two legitimate organizational imperatives, names the psychological stress that conflict creates (cognitive dissonance), and then proposes a structural solution — a second-chance employment program — that dissolves the tension rather than simply choosing one side. This technique shows mature analytical reasoning by reframing an either/or dilemma as a both/and policy design problem.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by situating HR within its broader stakeholder obligations, then isolates the specific hiring dilemma around criminal backgrounds. It moves through risk management concerns, community and redemption arguments, the psychological burden on HR practitioners, legal vulnerability from discrimination claims, and finally a practical multi-factor conclusion covering offense recency, severity, and government incentive programs. The argument is cumulative, with each section adding a new dimension to the central policy recommendation.
Introduction: HR's Dual Hiring Responsibility
As the hiring component of a business, human resources carries a responsibility to represent the best interests of the organization while also upholding the values and commitments to society that the organization promotes through its culture. Businesses must respect all stakeholders and work to serve each one — including shareholders, employees, customers, clients, and members of the community. When it comes to hiring the right individuals for the right positions, HR must assess each applicant individually and on a case-by-case basis to determine whether his or her personality and skill level align with the role.
In order to reduce job turnover — which can be costly for businesses — HR must address the issue of negligent hiring while simultaneously complying with EEOC (2017) rules and regulations regarding discrimination against applicants who have a criminal past. This paper discusses the approaches HR can take toward properly and effectively addressing this issue, and the steps organizations can take in hiring that serve both the company and the broader community.
Negligent Hiring and Organizational Risk
When considering possible hires, HR must place emphasis on identifying candidates who will best serve the organization. Part of this focus depends on proper risk management. In order to mitigate the risk of hiring a candidate who may not be trustworthy, who may steal from the company, or who may damage the company's reputation, HR has a responsibility to avoid negligent hiring situations. This means carefully weighing the risks associated with hiring individuals who have criminal or otherwise challenged backgrounds (Zeidner, 2014).
References
EEOC. (2017). Pre-employment inquiries and arrest & conviction. eeoc.gov. Retrieved 1 February 2017, from
Sondik, K. (2016). Ban the box leaves employers liable for negligent-hiring lawsuits. NYTimes.com. Retrieved 1 February 2017, from http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2016/04/13/should-a-jail-record-be-an-employers-first-impression/ban-the-box-leaves-employers-liable-for-negligent-hiring-lawsuits
Waldo, M. (2012). Second chances: Employing convicted felons. SHRM. Retrieved 1 February 2017, from https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/hr-magazine/pages/0312waldo.aspx
Zeidner, R. (2014). The dilemma of criminal background screening. SHRM. Retrieved 1 February 2017, from https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/hr-magazine/pages/0614-criminal-background-screens.aspx
Already a member? Log in
Unlock the rest of this paper
135,000+ research papers · AI writing tools · Plagiarism & AI detection
7-Day Pass
Does not renew
Get 7-Day PassMonthly
Renews at $12.99/month until canceled
Start MonthlyAnnual
Renews at $99/year until canceled
Start Annual- Unlimited AI writing tools
- Plagiarism and AI text detection tool
Plan details
Unlimited AI writing tools are for individual, non-automated use and are subject to our Terms of Service and abuse-prevention measures.
TextChecker scans: 3 during the 7-Day Pass, or 5 per month with Monthly and Annual.
Prices exclude applicable tax.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.