This paper reviews Maddox's (2004) article examining how IBM leveraged an integrated marketing communications (IMC) campaign to rescue and rebuild its failing brand image. In 1999, Fortune labeled IBM the "big blue dinosaur," yet by 2004 Business Week/Interbrand ranked it the third most valuable global brand. Working with Ogilvy & Mather Worldwide, IBM launched its "e-business on demand" campaign in 2002, unifying advertising, public relations, direct marketing, sports sponsorships, and digital media into a single cohesive strategy. The paper evaluates the campaign's effectiveness against core IMC principles, highlighting IBM's customer-centric approach and innovative use of traditional and online media channels.
The paper demonstrates effective use of a single-source article review structure: it summarizes the source's key arguments, contextualizes them within broader marketing theory (IMC principles), and then evaluates the subject's real-world outcomes against that theoretical standard. Direct quotations are integrated to support analytical points rather than substitute for them.
The paper opens with context about IBM's brand decline and recovery, then introduces the IMC campaign. A dedicated section defines IMC as a theoretical framework before the evaluation section applies that framework to IBM's specific tactics. The conclusion synthesizes the brand transformation outcome. This source-summary → theory → application → conclusion structure is a reliable model for article review assignments at the undergraduate level.
This paper reviews Maddox's (2004) article entitled "IBM's Strategy Keeps It In and On Demand," which explores how IBM utilized integrated marketing communications (IMC) as a powerful marketing campaign strategy. In 1999, Fortune deemed IBM Corporation the "big blue dinosaur" in its annual Fortune 500 issue, and the company appeared to be on the brink of extinction. However, by 2004, Business Week/Interbrand ranked IBM number three in its annual report of global brands — a remarkable turnaround in brand image.
According to Maddox (2004), "In the past decade, IBM has built its brand to a leading worldwide position by keeping its business relevant to changing times and effectively communicating its positioning through integrated marketing communications." A decade prior, the company was struggling with its global brand, which had become irrelevant. For this reason, IBM employed Ogilvy & Mather Worldwide, New York, to set a new direction for its brand strategy and began implementing an integrated marketing communications campaign.
This strategy was applied to IBM's "e-business on demand" marketing campaign, which launched in 2002. The campaign was designed so that all aspects of marketing communication worked together as a unified force — including advertising, public relations, and direct marketing. By utilizing this "360-degree marketing communications strategy, IBM has effectively used TV, print, outdoor, events, sports sponsorships, online and non-traditional media to communicate its brand positioning" (Maddox, 2004).
Maddox (2004) notes that IBM's campaign was centered on using traditional media in new and innovative ways. For this IMC campaign, IBM used online video to deliver its brand message to business decision makers. Partnerships with ESPN.com, CNN.com, and other Internet sites released interactive video interviews with key IBM executives, along with a variety of other content, to connect with IBM's target audience.
The primary issue discussed in Maddox's (2004) article is how IBM used an IMC campaign to pull itself out of a state of brand irrelevance and into one of global admiration. IBM applied innovative twists to traditional media for its IMC campaign. By utilizing television, print, outdoor advertising, events, sports sponsorships, and online advertising, IBM rebuilt its brand positioning to the top of the industry.
To evaluate the effectiveness of IBM's integrated marketing communications campaign, it is first necessary to understand what IMC truly is. IMC is a marketing concept in which all aspects of marketing communications are unified. Advertising, sales promotions, public relations, and direct marketing all work together toward a singular goal, rather than operating independently of one another.
Typically, an IMC campaign begins with an assessment of the organization's customers' needs — both internal and external. These needs then form the primary marketing goal that all facets of the marketing communications strive to achieve. This customer-centric starting point is what distinguishes a well-executed IMC strategy from a fragmented one.
IBM clearly succeeded in binding together all forms of marketing communications into one cohesive unit for its "e-business on demand" campaign. No matter where the marketing communication originated, the message remained consistent. Whether IBM utilized television, print, outdoor advertising, events, sports sponsorships, or online advertising, all facets of the marketing campaign were aligned with what public relations and direct marketing were doing to rebuild the company's failing brand.
The campaign was also built to be customer-centric, which is a key starting point of any integrated marketing communications campaign. IBM utilized marketing channels such as websites featuring interactive videos with key executives to ensure it effectively reached its target audience. As one IBM marketing executive noted, "When we are trying to reach loyalists for a given server platform, it wouldn't be economical to deliver the message using traditional TV" (as cited in Maddox, 2004). This kind of channel selectivity reflects a sophisticated understanding of customer-centric marketing strategy.
In the end, by utilizing IMC, IBM was able to completely reinvent its brand, rising from the depths of possible extinction — as the label "big blue dinosaur" suggested — to one of the top-ranked brands in the world. With this campaign, IBM successfully diversified from its legacy mainframe computer image to a high-tech consulting image capable of carrying the organization well into the future.
You’re 81% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.