This paper examines the relationship between information technology (IT) investments and organizational performance, focusing on the persistent challenge of achieving optimal return on investment. Drawing on a body of empirical research, the paper explores how traditional ROI metrics and KPIs fall short when applied to knowledge-based processes. It discusses the role of productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus as performance measures, with particular attention to the healthcare industry. The paper further argues that selective, cross-functional IT adoption—rather than wholesale deployment—drives competitive advantage, and that knowledge creation, collaboration, and enterprise-wide integration are the true determinants of sustainable IT value.
Enterprises have continually invested in information technologies (IT) to gain competitive advantages by improving their business processes, integrating and aggregating diverse databases, and transforming data into a competitive asset. The paradox of how to invest in IT for an optimal return, however, has remained elusive (Brynjolfsson & Hitt, 1998). Traditional measures of return on investment (ROI), metrics, and key performance indicators (KPIs) have failed to scale from the operational sides of a business to the data- and knowledge-based processes and functions (Ko & Osei-Bryson, 2008). Analysis of IT investments and their contributions to a firm's financial performance illustrates that the selective use of IT to supplement strategies—not its wholesale adoption—is a critical success factor (Osei-Bryson & Ko, 2004). Studies have shown that in a market duopoly characterized by slow to moderate growth, the automation of processes and strategies has the potential to deliver higher ROI compared to fragmented industries (Quan, Hu, & Hart, 2004).
Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus all have implications for the ROI any enterprise attains from its IT investments (Hitt & Brynjolfsson, 1996). These three factors form the foundation for knowledge-based innovations that transform data, customer information, and financial information into competitive advantages. The transition from measuring production efficiency purely on an output basis versus value-add based on insight and intelligence began over a decade ago (Dewan & Min, 1997). The paradox lies in the fact that the most consequential aspects of IT performance—those related to knowledge creation and organizational agility—remain the hardest to quantify, yet they are among the most significant drivers of long-term competitive advantage (Brynjolfsson & Hitt, 1996).
The healthcare industry is one where productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus combine to create a measurable platform for determining the impact of IT investments on firm performance (Thouin, Hoffman, & Ford, 2008). In healthcare, competitive advantage through IT has been realized due to the well-defined and orchestrated processes used for managing the patient lifecycle (Osei-Bryson & Ko, 2004). The stability and rigor with which the patient lifecycle is managed provide these businesses with the necessary foundation to automate processes, increase compliance levels, and transform their operations. This transformation is not being accomplished through manual workflow or process management techniques alone. The emergence of context- and role-based knowledge continues to act as an accelerator to the process- and strategy-based efforts of enterprises seeking to become as competitive as possible through IT investment (Ko & Osei-Bryson, 2008).
"Knowledge integration over isolated efficiency gains"
"Enterprise-wide metrics as IT investment success factor"
You’re 39% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.