Ismene as Foil to Antigone in Sophocles' Play
This essay examines how Sophocles uses the character of Ismene as a foil to her sister Antigone in the Greek tragedy Antigone. Through close reading of key scenes — from the sisters' opening confrontation over burying Polynices to Ismene's final confession of shared guilt — the paper argues that the contrast between the two characters is more nuanced than a simple strong-versus-weak binary. While Antigone embodies idealistic conviction and defiant courage, Ismene demonstrates practical wisdom, quiet loyalty, and a deep capacity for love. The essay contends that Sophocles deliberately layers each sister's character so that each illuminates the other, making Ismene not a figure of weakness but an equally admirable, if differently expressed, moral agent.
- Introduction: Setting Up the Foil: Sophocles uses characters to contrast personality and conviction
- The Sisters' Contrasting Reactions to Creon's Proclamation: Antigone defies; Ismene counsels cautious survival
- Antigone's Idealism and Its Limits: Second burial reveals Antigone's idealism as possibly reckless
- Ismene's Practical Wisdom and Hidden Courage: Ismene's false confession demonstrates quiet loyalty and bravery
- Love, Loyalty, and the Strength to Live: Ismene's love for Antigone outweighs Antigone's love for Ismene
- Conclusion: Two Equally Worthy Characters: Both sisters are admirable in their own distinct ways
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The essay resists the obvious reading — that Antigone is simply "strong" and Ismene "weak" — and builds a more nuanced argument that rehabilitates Ismene as a figure of quiet courage and practical wisdom.
- Textual quotations are woven directly into the argument rather than dropped in without analysis, allowing the evidence to carry interpretive weight.
- The comparison is sustained throughout the essay, returning repeatedly to the foil relationship rather than treating the two sisters in isolation.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates character foil analysis as a literary method: it systematically pairs scenes and moments from the play to show how one character's traits define and illuminate another's. This technique is grounded in close reading and supported by direct quotation, making abstract claims about personality concrete through textual evidence.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens by framing the foil relationship and its purpose, then moves through specific dramatic moments in roughly chronological order — the opening scene, Antigone's second burial attempt, and Ismene's false confession. It concludes by balancing admiration for both sisters, reinforcing the central argument that Sophocles makes each character equally worthy, though in different ways. This progression from surface contrast to deeper complexity gives the argument its arc.
Introduction: Setting Up the Foil
Sophocles' Antigone features several strong characters, each crafted to demonstrate how personality traits and strength of conviction shape individual decisions. If Creon's son Haemon serves as a contrast of wisdom against his father's pride and arrogance, then Antigone's sister Ismene functions as a foil that defines Antigone's character and the depth of her convictions.
One of the most effective ways to reveal a sharp contrast in personalities is to place two people — both with equal interests — in an identical situation where life-or-death choices must be made. Sophocles does exactly this in the opening scene of Antigone when he shows the different reactions of the two sisters to Creon's proclamation that their brother Polynices' body should be left unburied for the birds and dogs to devour.
The Sisters' Contrasting Reactions to Creon's Proclamation
Antigone's reaction is driven by her love for her dead brother and her belief in the heavenly decree that the dead must receive proper burial rites — irrespective of whether they lived virtuously. This conviction leads her to resolve to disobey the law and bury Polynices herself. From the very outset, Antigone is established as a strong, idealistic woman who has the courage to act on her beliefs.
Ismene's reaction, by contrast, is one of fear at the prospect of defying Creon's proclamation and thereby risking the deaths of the only two surviving members of the family. She is acutely aware of her position as a woman and feels unable to challenge the dictates of those in power.
More than anything else, Ismene comes across as a practical and cautious person who chooses survival over certain death: "We now left alone — / Do but consider how most miserably / We too shall perish... / We must remember we are women born, / Unable to cope with men... / ...I will ask / Pardon of those beneath...." (3, para. 2.9–17). Implicit in Ismene's words is the wiser counsel that a woman seen as challenging the authority of a man — and a ruler at that — would likely receive a far harsher punishment than a man would. It can also be argued that Ismene's judgment is grounded in the belief that the gods would not hold Polynices' unburied state against them, since the responsibility lay solely with Creon.
As events later confirm, Ismene's assessment proves entirely accurate. Creon's fury at being defied by a woman, and his conviction that a ruler cannot afford to be bested by one, turns out to be the primary force driving his decision to condemn Antigone to death.
Antigone's Idealism and Its Limits
Compare Ismene's caution with Antigone's almost single-minded approach to the situation, however noble her motives. This is especially evident in the scene where, having buried Polynices, she returns to discover that the body has been uncovered once more. It is here that one may infer a streak of immaturity in Antigone's idealism — a courage tinged with a lack of practical wisdom.
After all, it can be argued that Antigone had already fulfilled her heavenly and sisterly duty by burying Polynices once. To attempt the burial a second time, despite clear evidence that her violation of the law had been discovered, was to invite destruction and throw her own life away. One cannot help but recall Ismene's wiser counsel — that divine pardon could be sought, and that the two sisters were the only surviving members of their family.
Given Antigone's defiance and Ismene's reticence, it would be tempting to conclude simply that Antigone is strong and Ismene weak. On closer examination, however, Antigone's character is better described as idealistic, strong, and perhaps recklessly proud, while Ismene — though she professes to lack courage — possesses a practical wisdom that Antigone lacks. In lending each sister's character such subtle layers, Sophocles does a masterful job of setting each as a perfect foil to the other.
Conclusion: Two Equally Worthy Characters
It is not as if Antigone's character and actions deserve less admiration. It takes remarkable strength of conviction to summon the courage to defy the edicts of a king — and in an era when women were wholly subservient to men, the act is all the more extraordinary. Having said that, Sophocles' use of Ismene as a foil to Antigone is all the more masterful precisely because he renders Ismene equally worthy of admiration, though in a different way. In each aspect of the sisters' interactions, Ismene's character stands in illuminating contrast to Antigone's, and it is through that contrast that both women are fully revealed.
Works Cited
Sophocles. "Antigone." Ed. Appelbaum, Stanley. Dover, New York.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.