Job Redesign and Workplace Rewards at General Motors
This paper examines job redesign and workplace rewards at General Motors, drawing on the perspective of a frontline shift supervisor in a manufacturing plant. It analyzes intrinsic and extrinsic motivation strategies used to engage hourly employees, including the Global Manufacturing System (GMS), the Ideas for Excellence cash reward program, mandatory job rotation, and team-based business planning. The paper also addresses the challenges posed by union influence on traditional incentive structures and discusses how GM has moved away from an adversarial management culture toward collaborative, team-centered approaches that improve productivity, safety, efficiency, and employee commitment.
- Introduction: Overview of GM motivation challenges and study purpose
- Basic Motivation of Frontline Supervisors at General Motors: Supervisor techniques for motivating hourly workers
- Intrinsic Motivation of General Motors' Hourly Employees: Three types of intrinsic motivation applied at GM
- Cash Rewards and the Ideas for Excellence Program: External reward systems and innovation incentives
- Job Rotation and Workforce Development: Job rotation benefits and team leader selection
- Business Planning and Self-Led Teams: Team-level business plans and bi-weekly performance reviews
- Conclusion: Summary of GM motivation and redesign outcomes
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds theoretical motivation concepts — intrinsic vs. extrinsic, knowledge, accomplishment, and stimulation — in concrete workplace examples from a GM manufacturing plant, making abstract frameworks tangible.
- It draws on firsthand supervisory experience to illustrate how union dynamics complicate standard incentive strategies, adding practical credibility.
- The paper integrates multiple organizational programs (GMS, Ideas for Excellence, job rotation, business plan boards) into a coherent picture of GM's overall motivation architecture.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively applies established motivation theory — including Weinberg and Gould's three types of intrinsic motivation and Wilson's definition of external rewards — to a real organizational case study. This theory-to-practice mapping is a hallmark of applied management writing, showing that citations are not decorative but actively frame each program or policy being described.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a broad organizational challenge (attracting and retaining motivated workers), then narrows to GM's specific context and the author's supervisory role. Subsequent sections each address one motivation or redesign mechanism — intrinsic motivation types, cash rewards, job rotation, technical support, and business planning — before a brief conclusion tying outcomes back to GM's corporate goals. Each section follows a consistent pattern: define the concept, cite a source, then illustrate with a GM-specific example.
Introduction
Every year, organizations face great challenges in attracting and retaining a motivated, high-quality, and productive workforce. This makes it necessary for firms to constantly engage in job redesign as well as workplace rewards assessment activities (Slocum, 2004; Ugboro, 2006). Organizations are therefore forced to seek new and improved ways of keeping their workforce satisfied at all levels so as to harness higher levels of productivity and innovation. They must ensure that the workforce is happy and well motivated. One of the real challenges affecting companies is a lack of employee motivation, which in turn leads to poor job performance, low productivity, and reduced output.
This paper conducts a workplace rewards assessment and job redesign analysis of General Motors Inc., from the perspective of a shift and frontline supervisor in one of its manufacturing plants. The purpose of this study is to help facilitate a transformation away from the traditional "us against them" mentality that has historically existed between management and the workforce. At General Motors, the main motivational challenges are experienced by hourly employees. Intrinsic as well as extrinsic motivation have been critically analyzed, and their understanding has resulted in major changes in how different organizations are managed (Lei, 2010; Hayenga and Corpus, 2010).
Basic Motivation of Frontline Supervisors at General Motors
Several techniques exist for motivating employees. Remuneration rate is one such technique. Other factors include recognition, achievement, added responsibility, and the maintenance of strong communication. As a consequence of union influence, it is extremely difficult to provide traditional monetary incentives to hourly employees. Recognition was, however, noted to work best at General Motors. This is typically achieved by acknowledging outstanding employees through the award of gift certificates.
As a supervisor, time is regularly spent with employees to listen to their concerns — both professional and personal. This goes a long way in ensuring that hourly employees are well motivated to carry out their duties without undue stress. The outcome has been a motivated workforce that is dedicated to the missions and objectives of the company.
References
Barris, L. (1992). The overcompensation problem: A collective approach to controlling executive pay. Indiana Law Journal, 68, 59.
Hayenga, A., & Corpus, A. (2010). Profiles of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: A person-centered approach to motivation and achievement in middle school. Motivation & Emotion, 34(4), 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-010-9181-x
Lei, S. A. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Evaluating benefits and drawbacks from college instructors' perspectives. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 37(2), 153–160.
McCullagh, P. (2005). Sport and exercise psychology lecture. Cal State University East Bay.
Plowman, N. (2010). Advantages of job rotation: Reduce turnover by influencing employee burnout, satisfaction, and motivation. BrightHub.
Slocum, J. W. (2004). Job redesign: Improving the quality of work life.
Ugboro, I. O. (2006). Organizational commitment, job redesign, employee empowerment and intent to quit among survivors of restructuring and downsizing. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 7(3).
Weinberg, R., & Gould, D. (2003). Foundations of sport and exercise psychology. Human Kinetics.
Wilson, G. (2006). The effects of external rewards on intrinsic motivation.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.