This paper examines the juvenile justice system of the Republic of Ireland and compares it with that of the United States. It traces the legislative transition from the Children Act (1908) to the Children Act (2001), the first major reform in approximately one hundred years, and discusses ongoing delays in implementation. The paper reviews youth crime trends, investment in crime prevention initiatives, and Ireland's Juvenile Diversion Programme. It then compares prosecution rates, detention practices, and sanctioning approaches between Ireland and the United States, identifying areas where each system demonstrates relative strengths and weaknesses, particularly regarding community-based alternatives to detention and informal diversion mechanisms.
This paper examines the juvenile justice system in Ireland and compares it with the juvenile justice system of the United States. The strengths and weaknesses of the Irish system are considered, along with possible improvements, what the U.S. might learn from Ireland, and how the two systems compare in terms of relative strengths and weaknesses.
The juvenile justice system in the Republic of Ireland is reported to be in a period of transition following the replacement of the Children Act (1908) by the Children Act (2001) as the primary governing legislation. The Children Act (2001) represents the first major legislative reform of the juvenile justice system in approximately one hundred years. However, significant delays in bringing the Act into full force have resulted in an ongoing dependence on the outdated provisions of the Children Act (1908) in many areas. Although the Children Act (1908) was considered progressive at the time of its passage, it has since drawn criticism for being "archaic and out of keeping with current thinking on juvenile justice" (Seymour, n.d.).
Specific criticisms include: (1) a low age of criminal responsibility, applying to children under seven years of age; and (2) provisions relating to the detention and imprisonment of children. Some argue that restrictions imposed by the old legislation are largely to blame, while others contend that "political neglect of the juvenile justice system is equally responsible" (Seymour, n.d.). The state has also been criticised for its overemphasis on institutionalisation and its failure to develop adequate community-based alternatives.
Reports on youth crime in the Republic of Ireland indicate that recorded crimes involving juveniles have "remained steadily low over the past decade" (Seymour, n.d.). All juvenile cases in Ireland are referred centrally to the National Juvenile Office (NJO), operating under the auspices of the Garda SĂochána in Dublin, where a decision is made regarding the appropriate course of action. The total number of offences resulting in referrals to the National Juvenile Office increased significantly, from 14,488 in 2000 to 19,080 in 2001, and again to 20,647 in 2002 (Seymour, n.d.). The most common offences for which young people are referred include theft, criminal damage, drink-related offences, public order violations, traffic offences, burglary, vehicle offences, and minor assault (Seymour, n.d.).
In recent years, investment in projects addressing disadvantage and social exclusion among children and young people in Ireland has increased. Nevertheless, approaches to crime prevention have been characterised by "their non-integrated approach, lack of long-term investment and limited evaluation" (Seymour, n.d.). Difficulties with resources and planning persist; however, a number of crime prevention initiatives have been developed on a national basis, with plans underway to move toward a more integrated model of crime prevention (Seymour, n.d.).
The document entitled A Crime Prevention Strategy for Ireland: Tackling the Concerns of Local Communities includes proposals for a National Crime Prevention Model that would be developed at local, county, and national levels. The model would place emphasis on long-term planning, sustained investment, and regular independent evaluation. Widely available crime prevention initiatives in the Republic of Ireland include the following:
(1) Springboard Programme; (2) The Early Start Programme; (3) School Completion Programme; (4) Youthreach; (5) Garda Schools Programme; (6) Garda Special Projects (Youth Diversion Projects); and (7) Copping On (Seymour, n.d.).
The present policy of the Garda SĂochána is that young offenders are not prosecuted "unless their previous offences or the gravity of the present offence warrants such action" (Seymour, n.d.). A diversion programme known as the Juvenile Liaison Scheme was developed in Ireland in 1963. It is operated through a network of specially trained Juvenile Liaison Officers working under the guidance of the National Juvenile Office. To be admitted to the Juvenile Diversion Programme, the child must accept responsibility for his or her offending behaviour and consent to being cautioned (Seymour, n.d.).
Following the issuing of a formal caution, a conference is held involving the child, the child's family, and the victim. The purpose of this conference is to formulate an action plan for the child, which may include a range of provisions such as an apology to the victim, financial reparation, participation in pro-social activities, school or work attendance requirements, restrictions on the child's movements and associations, and other initiatives aimed at preventing reoffending (Seymour, n.d.).
The Children Act (2001) incorporates several principles relating to criminal jurisdiction over children:
"Diversion scheme rules and five statutory principles"
"U.S. referral, detention, and prosecution processes"
"Prosecution rates and sanctions compared across systems"
You’re 58% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.