Keeping Older Workers in the Workforce: Benefits and Interventions
This paper examines the benefits of keeping older adults in the workforce and proposes evidence-based interventions for a projected aging population in Little Whinging, Queensland, Australia. Drawing on Viktor Frankl's concept of meaning through work, as well as empirical research from institutions including the CDC, Cardiff University, and Hebrew University, the paper outlines the health, economic, and social advantages of continued employment in later life. It identifies the major factors that influence retirement decisions — health, finances, and work attachment — and recommends three targeted interventions: community health promotion programs, ergonomic and managerial workplace adjustments, and ongoing structured occupational health plans. A concluding caution addresses the risk of perceived exploitation when targeting older workers specifically.
- Introduction: Frankl's meaning through work; aging demographics in Australia
- Benefits and Disadvantages of Keeping Older Employees in the Workforce: Health, employer, and societal pros and cons
- Major Factors That Contribute to the Decision to Retire: Health, finances, and work attachment drive retirement
- Increasing the Health and Physical Well-Being of Older Workers: COACH program and community health promotion strategies
- Specific Interventions at Work: Age management training, ergonomics, and tailored programs
- Caution: Avoiding perceived exploitation in targeted interventions
- Conclusions: Integrated programs improve worker health and community contribution
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds its policy recommendations in empirical research, citing randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews from credible institutions such as the CDC, Cardiff University, and peer-reviewed journals.
- Moves logically from a theoretical foundation (Frankl's meaning-through-work) through a literature review to concrete, actionable recommendations, making the argument both intellectually coherent and practically useful.
- Acknowledges limitations and potential pitfalls — particularly the risk that targeted interventions may be perceived as exploitative — demonstrating critical thinking and ethical awareness.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper exemplifies evidence-based policy writing: each recommendation is tied directly to specific empirical studies, including effect sizes and follow-up outcomes (e.g., the COACH program's doubled participation rates and the De Boer et al. randomized trial showing reduced sick days and lower burnout). This technique strengthens the persuasiveness of the proposal by anchoring practical suggestions in measurable outcomes rather than general opinion.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a humanizing theoretical hook (Frankl), then contextualizes the local demographic problem (Little Whinging, Queensland). It proceeds through a benefits-and-disadvantages analysis, a review of retirement decision factors, and three recommendation sections. A standalone "Caution" section precedes the conclusion, giving ethical concerns their own structural weight. The references follow APA format throughout.
Introduction
The eminent psychiatrist Viktor Frankl, while enduring numerous hardships as a prisoner of war in a Nazi work camp — including isolation from family and the daily prospect of death — began to question the meaning of his own existence and of life in general. Frankl eventually concluded that people derive meaning from their lives through their suffering, their ability to love another, and their work (Frankl, 1985). A person's work helps define a sense of self, contributes to a feeling of usefulness, and helps keep them active (Frankl, 1985; Shacklock, 2006; Waddell & Burton, 2006). These benefits occur at any age; therefore, by continuing to remain in the workforce, elderly people can both contribute to their community and receive benefits beyond mere income from their employment.
Conclusions based on empirical evidence from esteemed research centers — such as the Department of Geriatric Medicine at Hebrew University and the Centre for Psychosocial Research at Cardiff University — have stated that continued mental and physical involvement through work in later life yields numerous benefits, including longer life expectancies for the elderly and broader benefits for society (Waddell & Burton, 2006). Moreover, life expectancies are longer now than ever before. As a result, movements at both national and regional levels have emerged to investigate the benefits of encouraging elderly individuals to remain in the workforce past traditionally defined retirement ages (e.g., 65 years of age; Waddell & Burton, 2006).
The projections for the rise in the elderly population of Little Whinging, Queensland, Australia predict that nearly 20% of the population will be over the age of 65 by the year 2030, and this percentage may increase to 25% by 2050. Mayor McGonagall has recognized the importance of keeping this proportion of the population healthy and productive, and has requested information regarding the factors that can keep older adults in the workforce as well as the feasibility of designing an intervention program to assist in this goal. This proposal discusses the benefits and factors that can help keep older adults in the workforce and makes recommendations for practical interventions to keep the elderly population active and productive.
A brief discussion of the empirical evidence regarding the benefits of remaining active and working in the later stages of life helps to identify practical interventions that can inform effective program design aimed at promoting continued work.
Benefits and Disadvantages of Keeping Older Employees in the Workforce
Continued physical activity in one's later years has been linked to a number of health benefits, including increased longevity (Waddell & Burton, 2006), reduced declines in cardiovascular and pulmonary functioning (National Heart Foundation of Australia, 2006), a reduced risk of developing conditions such as diabetes and osteoporosis (Nied & Franklin, 2002), decreases in mental health issues like depression (Watt & Cappeliez, 2000), reduced age-associated cognitive decline (Rohwedder & Willis, 2010), and better overall life satisfaction (Davis & Friedrich, 2004).
From an employer's perspective, there are numerous advantages to retaining older workers. These include greater dedication, punctuality, honesty, attention to detail, and pride in their work compared to younger counterparts, as well as better organizational skills, more experience handling workplace issues, and stronger communication skills (Center for Disease Control [CDC], 2012). From a societal perspective, keeping people in the workforce as they age reduces costs associated with poorer health and increased mental illness among elderly people not in the workforce (Shea & Haasen, 2006), sustains taxation revenue, potentially reduces labor costs (Shea & Haasen, 2006), and lessens government benefit expenditures while increasing productivity (CDC, 2012).
Disadvantages to having elderly people in the workforce include a reduced range of positions that older workers can fill compared to those available to younger workers (Special Committee on Aging, 2008), a tendency for decreased participation in training activities by older workers (Shea & Haasen, 2006), increased potential health issues that can lead to higher rates of absenteeism (CDC, 2012), and missed time due to caring for sick relatives (Commission on Aging, 2008).
In order to develop interventions to assist older workers in remaining in the workforce, it is important to briefly examine the empirical evidence regarding the major reasons individuals retire.
Major Factors That Contribute to the Decision to Retire
Several factors significantly influence an older worker's decision to retire. According to recent reviews of the retirement literature, a person's health significantly affects their decision to remain in the workforce (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2006). This includes potential health problems of the worker as well as health issues of the worker's partner. The second important factor is financial situation (Jackson, Walter, Felmingham, & Spinaze, 2006). Individuals who perceive their financial future as secure without employment income are obviously more likely to retire than those who do not. The third major factor is the person's attachment to work — that is, their desire to continue working (Patrickson & Ranzijn, 2004). Positive views about work can encourage older people to continue working in their later years, whereas dissatisfaction with career attainment and reduced job commitment can drive the decision to retire.
Interestingly, the opportunity to interact with others in the workplace has also been found to be a very attractive incentive for retaining older workers; retired workers report missing the relationships they had while employed (Shacklock, 2006). In addition, an older worker's perception of their decision-making role and the availability of flexible work arrangements have been found to significantly influence retirement decisions. Individuals who believe they have greater autonomy and the ability to balance work schedules with other responsibilities — such as caring for a partner — are less likely to retire (Phillipson & Smith, 2005). Other factors, such as the number of outside interests a person has, their perception of management, and their desire to remain in a particular region, also influence the decision to retire (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2006).
Factors such as financial situation, desire to relocate, and outside interests cannot easily serve as the focus of interventions aimed at keeping elderly workers in the workforce. However, programs to improve the health of elderly people and employer actions to improve working conditions — making the work environment more attractive to older workers — can be initiated.
As it is clear that the workforce is rapidly aging and that specific challenges are involved in retaining older workers, Little Whinging can be proactive in ensuring that older workers are more likely to remain employed until they choose to retire. Three specific recommendations follow.
References
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2006). Retirement and retirement intentions. Canberra: Author.
Beier, M. E., & Kanfer, R. (2013). Work performance and the older worker. Sage Handbook on Aging, Work, and Society, 16, 65–97.
Center for Disease Control. (2012). Older employees in the workplace. In National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Retrieved September 25, 2014, from
Cummings, T., & Worley, C. (2014). Organization development and change. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
De Boer, A. G. E. M., Van Beek, J. C., Durinck, J., Verbeek, J. H. A. M., & Van Dijk, F. J. H. (2004). An occupational health intervention programme for workers at risk for early retirement: A randomised controlled trial. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 61(11), 924–929.
Davis, N. C., & Friedrich, D. (2004). Knowledge of aging and life satisfaction among older adults. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 59(1), 43–61.
Frankl, V. E. (1985). Man's search for meaning. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Hughes, S. L., Seymour, R. B., Campbell, R. T., Shaw, J. W., Fabiyi, C., & Sokas, R. (2011). Comparison of two health-promotion programs for older workers. American Journal of Public Health, 101(5), 883–890.
Ilmarinen, J. E. (2001). Aging workers. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 58(8), 546–546.
Jackson, N., Walter, M., Felmingham, B., & Spinaze, A. (2006). Will older workers change their retirement plans in line with government thinking? A review of recent literature on retirement intentions. Australian Labour Bulletin, 32(4), 315–344.
National Heart Foundation of Australia. (2006). Physical activity and healthy ageing. Retrieved September 25, 2014, from
Nied, R. J., & Franklin, B. (2002). Promoting and prescribing exercise for the elderly. American Family Physician, 65(3), 419–426.
Patrickson, M., & Ranzijn, R. (2004). Bounded choices in work and retirement in Australia. Employee Relations, 26(4), 422–432.
Phillipson, C., & Smith, A. (2005). Extending working life: A review of the research literature (Vol. 299). Leeds, UK: Corporate Document Services.
Rohwedder, S., & Willis, R. J. (2010). Mental retirement. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(1), 119–138.
Shacklock, K. (2006). Extended working lives? The meaning of working to older university workers in Australia. Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 6(2–4), 161–173.
Shea, G. F., & Haasen, A. (2006). The older worker advantage: Making the most of our aging workforce. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Special Committee on Aging. (2008). Report of the Taskforce on the Aging of the American Workforce. Retrieved September 24, 2014, from
Waddell, G., & Burton, A. K. (2006). Is work good for your health and well-being? London: The Stationery Office.
Watt, L. M., & Cappeliez, P. (2000). Integrative and instrumental reminiscence therapies for depression in older adults: Intervention strategies and treatment effectiveness. Aging & Mental Health, 4(2), 166–177.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.