Kotter & Cohen Change Management: Starbucks Case Study
This paper applies Kotter and Cohen's eight-phase change management framework to Starbucks' organizational turnaround beginning in 2008. After rapid domestic expansion led to quality decline and revenue loss, CEO Howard Schultz led a dramatic recovery effort that included closing nearly all stores for barista retraining, shutting 600 underperforming locations, and refusing to cut employee healthcare benefits. The paper traces each of Kotter and Cohen's stages — from creating urgency and building a guiding team, to empowering action, generating short-term wins, and making change stick — through specific strategic decisions Starbucks made. The analysis concludes with the company's shift toward international expansion into China and India as evidence of a sustainable, ongoing transformation.
- Introduction: Starbucks and the Need for Change: Starbucks crisis context and Kotter framework overview
- Creating Urgency and Building a Guiding Team: Store closure, retraining, and Schultz's return
- Communicating Buy-In and Empowering Action: Employee retraining, healthcare retention, operational changes
- Short-Term Wins and Sustaining Momentum: Menu overhaul, innovation, and international growth plans
- Making the Change Stick: International Expansion: China, India expansion and localized menu strategy
- Conclusion: Customer feedback confirms quality-focused change success
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It consistently maps each of Kotter and Cohen's eight stages to a specific, documented Starbucks action, giving the theoretical framework concrete grounding throughout.
- It balances multiple stakeholder perspectives — employees, customers, shareholders, and international markets — showing awareness of organizational change as a multidimensional process.
- It uses real business decisions (store closures, menu overhauls, healthcare retention) as evidence rather than relying on vague generalizations, making the argument credible and specific.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied theoretical analysis: rather than summarizing Kotter and Cohen's model abstractly, the author uses it as a diagnostic lens, moving step-by-step through the framework while anchoring each stage in primary business reporting. This approach — theory-to-practice mapping — is a core skill in management coursework.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief introduction of the Kotter and Cohen framework and the Starbucks context, then moves chronologically through the eight stages, grouping related steps into cohesive paragraphs. Each body paragraph introduces a stage, cites the theoretical basis, and immediately illustrates it with a Starbucks example. The conclusion ties the analysis back to the opening premise using recent customer feedback as closing evidence. The structure is linear and thesis-driven, appropriate for a short management case study.
Introduction: Starbucks and the Need for Change
Kotter and Cohen (2002) outline an eight-phase change process to explain why some organizations succeed and others fail at change management. These stages include: increasing the sense of urgency for change; building a guiding team; getting the change vision right; communicating to stakeholders to generate enthusiasm or "buy-in"; empowering action; creating short-term wins; not letting up; and making the change "stick" (Kotter & Cohen 2002: 6). All of these principles can be seen in the case of Starbucks, a popular coffee retailer whose fortunes flagged until it decided to drastically improve the quality of its coffee and focus on international rather than domestic expansion.
In 2008, Starbucks was in a state of crisis. The Seattle-based coffee chain had become wildly profitable and popular, spreading across America — often opening stores very close to one another in defiance of conventional business wisdom. The concept behind Starbucks was to provide an accessible European coffee experience with a hometown feel in every store. Unlike many franchises, Starbucks was known for tailoring the resources of its stores to the needs of the specific local customer base. However, by 2008 the company was facing major revenue loss due to criticisms that the quality of its coffee had deteriorated and was no longer worth the price. Additionally, "Starbucks' business model had spiraled out of control," with seven new stores opening per day (Kowitt 2008). This rapid expansion had resulted in a significant loss of quality control.
References
Allison, M. (2008). Starbucks stores to shut 3 hours on Feb. 26 for retraining baristas. Seattle Times.
Arora, A. (2013). In Starbucks, taste trumps price. Reuters.
Kotter, J. and Cohen, D. (2002). The heart of change: Real-life stories of how people change their organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Kowitt, B. (2008). [Starbucks business model coverage.] Fortune/CNN Money.
Loeb, W. (2013). Starbucks global coffee giant has new growth plans. Forbes.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.