Law Enforcement Employment, Custody Rights, and Suspect Privacy
This paper addresses three distinct but related issues in law enforcement administration and civil liberties. The first section examines the challenges of terminating a police officer for repeated use of excessive force, including the role of police unions, arbitration procedures, and due process requirements. The second section analyzes the Eighth Amendment right against cruel and unusual punishment through the case of Jennifer Lobato, who died in police custody after her medical complaints were ignored. The third section considers the legal and ethical problems surrounding the designation of "persons of interest," drawing on high-profile cases such as Richard Jewell and Steven Hatfill to argue for stronger legislative protections against premature public identification of suspects.
- Terminating an Officer for Excessive Force: Union constraints and due process in officer dismissal
- The Eighth Amendment and Inmate Rights in Custody: Lobato case and custody healthcare obligations
- The 'Person of Interest' Designation and Media Leaks: Legal risks of naming suspects to the press
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Each section applies a concrete real-world case or scenario to a specific legal framework, grounding abstract principles in recognizable events.
- The paper balances administrative perspective (what a department should do) with constitutional analysis (what the law requires), showing two-sided thinking.
- Citations from mainstream legal commentary, news sources, and professional organizations (ABA) give each argument credible evidentiary support.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied legal analysis: it identifies the relevant legal standard (labor law, Eighth Amendment, defamation), applies it to a factual scenario, and recommends a course of action. This moves beyond description into policy-level argument, which is characteristic of criminal justice and public administration writing at the undergraduate level.
Structure breakdown
The paper is organized as three discrete discussion posts, each addressing a separate prompt. Section one covers officer termination and union constraints. Section two examines Eighth Amendment violations illustrated by the Lobato case. Section three analyzes the "person of interest" label and its consequences for civil liberties and media ethics. Each section ends with a brief normative recommendation, giving the paper a consistent problem-solution structure throughout.
Terminating an Officer for Excessive Force
Currently there are no federal laws governing the employment contracts of law enforcement officers, and in fact, law enforcement has yet to be professionalized or federalized in any comprehensive way. This situation may change in the future as the quality of law enforcement in the United States is increasingly called into question — particularly in cases where an officer has been repeatedly accused of unnecessary force and brutality. As an administrator, the appropriate response to such conduct is immediate termination of the officer's contract.
The primary constraints on such a decision come from the Department of Labor's fair labor standards, as well as employment law considerations that apply to specialized personnel. If the members of the department are members of a police union, there could be serious repercussions to consider. Friedersdorf (2014) points out that faulty arbitration procedures sometimes hinder a rightful termination rather than simply protecting employees from wrongful termination: "Too many cops who needlessly kill people, use excessive force, or otherwise abuse their authority are getting reprieves from termination" (Friedersdorf, 2014, p. 1).
In such a case, an administrator should gather as much information as possible to substantiate claims that the officer committed systematic wrongdoings and posed a detriment to public safety. Due process considerations can help determine which issues to focus on when outlining and communicating the grounds for termination, as well as how to frame those issues as criminal misconduct (Jensen & Kim, 2015). Consulting with legal counsel would tremendously help to successfully terminate the officer while also setting in motion procedures for changing the organizational culture that allows such problems to develop in the first place.
References
Friedersdorf, C. (2014). How police unions and arbitrators keep abusive cops on the street. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/12/how-police-unions-keep-abusive-cops-on-the-street/383258/
Jensen, E. L. & Kim, M. N. (2015). Termination of public employees: Due process requirements. Forge Ahead. Retrieved from http://www.heylroyster.com/_data/files/Seminar%202015/Govt/G-ELJ-V5-Final.pdf
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.