This paper presents an experimental study investigating the effect of environmental light conditions on memory recall. Forty adult participants were divided into two groups: one writing about a childhood memory outdoors in natural light, and one in a darkened classroom. Recall quality was measured across five descriptive categories — color, smell, texture, temperature, and feelings. Drawing on literature concerning light therapy's effects on cognition, circadian rhythms, and neurochemistry, the study finds that participants in outdoor light produced significantly richer memory descriptions (53 out of 100 possible descriptors) compared to those in darkened conditions (31 out of 100), suggesting that brighter light environments enhance the detail and richness of memory recall.
Light therapy is becoming increasingly acknowledged to have an impact on various conditions known to medicine. For example, it is increasingly being used to assist shift workers who have difficulty sleeping in reestablishing their circadian rhythm following shift and swing shift work. Light therapy has also been shown to be effective in treating what is commonly known as the "winter blues" — depression related to cold weather and reduced natural light in the environment. This study examines light therapy in relation to the impact it has on individual memory recall.
Because light therapy is so effective in treating such a wide range of diseases and conditions, light must also play a role in individuals' memory recall. Therefore, it is hypothesized that brighter light will result in better memory recall among a group of individuals, compared to a group recalling events in darkened or muted light.
The methodology employed in this study is qualitative, conducted with an experimental group and a control group. Qualitative analysis is appropriate here because the data provided by participants is descriptive in nature, and the method of analysis is therefore interpretative.
The forty participants in this study were split into two groups. The first group went outside for approximately twenty minutes, and the second group remained inside a darkened classroom. Participants in each group were asked to write about a childhood memory. Their written accounts were reviewed by the researcher and an assistant and were analyzed according to the details provided as participants described their childhood memory — specifically according to the use of the following descriptive categories:
(1) color; (2) smell; (3) texture; (4) temperature; and (5) feelings.
There were 40 participants in total, all of whom were eighteen years of age or older.
Bersani et al. (2008), in their study "Pilot Study of Light Therapy and Neurocognitive Performance of Attention and Memory in Healthy Subjects," investigated whether light therapy improved healthy subjects' neurocognitive performance of attention, memory, and language. Ten subjects were treated with bright light for five days, while a control group of ten individuals received no treatment. Assessment was conducted using a battery of neurocognitive tests, including the Stroop Colour Word Interference Test, the Verbal Fluency Test, the Story Recall Test, and the Word Pairs Recall Test. Analysis showed improvements in cognitive scores in both groups, although on all cognitive tests the mean difference scores between baseline and endpoint were significantly larger in the light-treated group. These preliminary results suggest that short-term bright light may exert beneficial effects on cognitive functions (Bersani et al., 2008).
Takao, Hiroshi, Ritsuko, and Shunkichi (1999), in their study "Effects of Bright Light on Cognitive Disturbances in Alzheimer-type Dementia," examined the effectiveness of bright light therapy on cognitive disturbances and its effect on circadian (sleep-wake) rhythm in Alzheimer-type dementia (ATD). Twenty-seven patients with ATD were treated with bright light therapy each morning for four consecutive weeks. Cognitive functions and circadian rhythms were evaluated using actigraphy and cognitive assessments — the Mini-Mental-State Examination (MMSE) and the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS) — both before and after light therapy. Bright light therapy improved circadian rhythm. While it had no significant effect on the overall severity of dementia, it improved MMSE scores, cognitive functions on ADAS scores (memory and language), and non-cognitive ADAS scores (behavior, mood), especially in the questionable and mild dementia groups. The authors concluded that bright light therapy improves cognitive functions through the modification of circadian rhythm, particularly in the early stages of ATD (Takao et al., 1999).
Moore (1974), in "Visual Pathways and the Central Neural Control of Diurnal Rhythms," found that the optic nerve travels from the retina, past the pituitary gland via the temporal lobe to the occipital lobe of the brain — a part of the visual system dedicated to informing the conscious brain of its surroundings. Moore also identified an additional nerve bundle leading directly from the retina to the hypothalamus, which explains a range of physiological effects associated with color:
(1) Blue stimulates the anterior hypothalamus, which governs the parasympathetic nervous system, producing sedating, digestion-activating, and sleep-inducing effects for colors in the blue spectrum (blue-green through violet); (2) Red stimulates the posterior hypothalamus and the sympathetic nervous system, producing stimulating and sometimes provocative responses for colors in the red spectrum (magenta through yellow); and (3) Green mediates between both systems (Moore, 1974).
The work of Dietrich Klinghardt, MD, PhD, drawing on Norman (1990), notes changes in the concentration of neurotransmitters in the cerebrospinal fluid — including norepinephrine, serotonin, beta-endorphin, cholinesterase, melatonin, oxytocin, growth hormone, LH, prolactin, and progesterone. These findings explain why the projection of light into the eye can have a profound effect on the hormonal system, emotions, stress levels, sleep, brain function, and many other aspects of a patient's biochemistry and well-being. The profound effect of light stimulation to the retina on the body's metabolism was further established through the work of German ophthalmologist Fritz Hollwich, M.D., Ph.D. (Hollwich, 1985, as cited in Klinghardt, n.d.).
Reporting in December 2008, Natural News noted that treatment of Alzheimer's disease through light therapy has been found effective in assisting brain functioning and memory. Two specific studies raised the possibility that the progression of Alzheimer's disease can be treated successfully through a combination of therapies that includes light therapy (Baker, 2008).
Michalon, Eskes, and Mate-Kole (1997), in "Effects of Light Therapy on Neuropsychological Function and Mood in Seasonal Affective Disorder," noted that little attention had previously been paid to changes in neuropsychological function in seasonal affective disorder (SAD). They investigated thirty patients' performance on a wide range of cognitive variables before and after two weeks of light treatment with either white or placebo red light, and again in the summertime. Findings indicated that the most consistent deficits associated with SAD were on tests of cognitive failures, visual memory, and visual-construction skills. Reports of cognitive failures did not change with either light treatment. Visual memory and constructional deficits responded non-specifically to treatment with either white or the presumed placebo red light. Notably, visual memory deficits reappeared in the summer, at a time when mood, cognitive failures, and other cognitive functions appeared to be at normal levels. These data suggest that cognitive functioning is affected by SAD, and that light treatment may have differential effects on mood and cognition (Michalon, Eskes, and Mate-Kole, 1997).
"Justification for studying light and memory"
"Results table and group comparison outcomes"
These results indicate that memory recall in an outdoor light environment was 22% higher in descriptive richness than memory recall in a darkened or muted-light environment, supporting the hypothesis that brighter environmental light enhances the quality and detail of memory recall.
This study sought to ascertain the impact that environmental light conditions have on individuals' recall of childhood memories. The investigation found that outside light positively affects the memory recall of an individual compared to recall undertaken in a room where light is muted or darkened. Participants recalling memories in natural daylight produced significantly more detailed and sensory-rich accounts than those in the darkened classroom setting.
The implications of these findings cross occupational and academic boundaries, touching on the biological, physiological, psychological, and physical aspects of human functioning. Much more research is needed to better understand the specific benefits of light — in both its intensity and its color — on human cognitive performance. Future studies should employ larger sample sizes, more controlled experimental conditions, and longitudinal designs in order to establish a more robust understanding of how and why environmental light conditions influence memory recall.
You’re 73% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.