This paper examines John Locke's philosophical distinction between primary and secondary qualities of objects. Primary qualities — such as shape, size, and motion — are presented as objective, perceiver-independent features of objects, while secondary qualities — such as color, sound, and taste — are described as mind-dependent powers that produce sensations in observers. The paper explains Locke's definitions, illustrates them through examples like snow and fire, and evaluates key criticisms. It concludes that while Locke's framework rests on a valid premise, the boundary between the two categories remains ambiguous and is subject to significant philosophical debate.
The paper demonstrates philosophical exposition followed by critical evaluation: it first reconstructs Locke's argument in its strongest form using direct quotation and paraphrase, then applies counterexamples to test the theory's limits. This two-step approach — reconstruct, then critique — is a core technique in undergraduate philosophy writing and helps readers understand both what a thinker claims and why those claims may be contested.
The paper opens with a broad statement of Locke's theory, moves into formal definitions supported by cited passages, then uses illustrative examples to deepen understanding. The final section pivots to critique, examining specific cases (color constancy, distance-dependent perception) that challenge the primary/secondary boundary. The conclusion acknowledges the theory's merit while maintaining that its categorical distinctions remain philosophically unresolved.
John Locke believed that every object possesses both primary and secondary qualities. He maintained that these two types of attributes are essential to forming a complete idea of any given object. Primary qualities, in his view, are attributes such as shape, size, and motion — features that remain constant regardless of who the perceiver is or what the observational conditions happen to be. In other words, primary qualities are independent of the perceiver and remain the same for every observer. Secondary qualities, on the other hand, are attributes such as color and the sensations we derive from interacting with an object, including feelings produced by touch, taste, or smell.
Primary qualities are defined as those qualities of an object in the external world that are characteristic of the object as it is in itself — present whether or not anyone is aware of the object. Locke lists extension (an object's occupying space or three-dimensionality, hence its size), shape, motion or rest, solidity or impenetrability, and number as primary qualities. These qualities are said to be measurable: we can determine the length, width, and height of a desk, and we can also measure how much it weighs (Strayer).
As Locke himself argues, primary qualities are "utterly inseparable from the body," persisting in the object regardless of perception. This measurability and independence from any individual observer is what distinguishes primary qualities from their secondary counterparts.
Secondary qualities, by contrast, are defined as all sensible qualities that are not primary — including colors, sounds, tastes, odors, and felt textures. They are considered mind-dependent in that physics does not describe objects as possessing color; rather, physics tells us that objects consist of atoms, which themselves lack color. Color, on this view, arises from matter interacting with minds (Strayer). In Locke's own words, secondary qualities "in truth are nothing in the objects themselves, but powers to produce various sensations in us."
You’re 37% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.