This paper examines the complex challenges facing the Perez family, a recently immigrated Argentinian family living in rural America. Drawing on a case study from Ashford, Lecroy, and Lortie's human behavior text, the paper analyzes the family's social, cultural, health, and economic stressors — including Luis's diagnosis with multiple sclerosis, cultural and generational conflict, religious isolation, and the absence of community support. The paper identifies major dysfunctions, proposes intervention strategies aligned with ethical human service standards, and presents an eco-map illustrating the family's relationships with key social systems including church, education, work, and community. The analysis emphasizes non-coercive, strengths-based advocacy for a family navigating acculturation and crisis.
This paper demonstrates case-based applied analysis: taking a multifaceted client scenario and systematically identifying stressors, dysfunctions, and intervention opportunities through the lens of human service ethics. The writer uses the Ethical Standards for Human Service Professionals as a normative framework to evaluate their own role, showing how professional boundaries and beneficence constrain the range of appropriate responses.
The paper opens with a narrative overview of the Perez family's circumstances, then shifts to character-level analysis of Luis and the family unit. It transitions into a discussion of professional values and ethical constraints, followed by a practical intervention plan organized around three themes: isolation, religion, and social/health needs. The paper closes with an eco-map that visually maps the family's connections — and disconnections — with key social systems.
Luis Perez, recently deceased, was a successful vintner in Argentina before he and his wife, Maria, decided to immigrate to the United States in order to provide more opportunities for their family. Despite the expense, they were able to purchase a small rural plot to grow grapes. They brought their eight children — ranging in age from 19 to 3 — along with Luis's elderly parents and two dogs to America. Luis and the children are fluent in English; Maria is unconfident in her language skills; and Luis's parents, Ramon and Carmen, have no desire to learn English and prefer that the family continue in their traditional, Roman Catholic, Argentinian culture.
Life in the United States is quite dissimilar to that in Argentina. The closest church is 15 miles away and is served by a traveling priest. There is no immigrant or Argentinian community for any of the adults, and almost from the start there is a strong desire on the part of the children to acculturate. Unfortunately, Ramon dies, and Luis falls victim to multiple sclerosis, burdening the family with medical bills and difficulty maintaining the farm. The oldest son, Rolando (age 19), is expected to assume the role of "man of the house," but is resentful because he wishes to go to college and pursue a different direction. The other children try to make friends at school and have little interest in their grandmother's "traditional" ways.
Maria and Grandmother Carmen feel increasingly isolated without their husbands at full capacity and with the family in turmoil. The family itself is quite isolated from the community, and other than school, the children have little opportunity to distance themselves from the stress of their family life. Adding to the difficulty, Maria is pregnant and overwhelmed by the prospect of caring for a terminally ill husband with an incurable, progressive disease (Ashford, Lecroy, and Lortie).
Until his illness, Luis was clearly a vibrant, hard-working man — intelligent and deeply concerned about the welfare of his family, the future of his children, and finding a way to pass on a legacy to the next generation. The strongest influence on his behavior was the relationship and cultural heritage passed on to him by his parents, Ramon and Carmen, who clearly prioritize family and family values over individual needs, using the family unit as their core cultural anchor. Yet one must also surmise that the decision to move to the United States was intended to allow the children to move into a different kind of life — one with opportunities Luis felt were unavailable in Argentina.
Luis certainly never anticipated being struck with a debilitating and incurable disease at roughly the prime of his life. He and Maria have a clearly positive relationship, evidenced by eight children and one on the way. His plans, however, did not account for the fiscal and health crises that make it impossible for him to work as hard as needed to ensure the farm's success. As he transitions from middle adulthood toward late adulthood, he is likely to become more conservative and nostalgic for traditional family ways. His father has died, his mother is isolated, his wife is worried, and his oldest son is only grudgingly working the farm. Luis likely feels powerless because he is unable to quickly and decisively solve these problems as he has so many times before. He will also need to accept increasing medical care as his multiple sclerosis progresses — a role that will likely fall to his wife as she simultaneously faces caring for a new child.
In working with the family, two major dysfunctions stand out as particularly challenging. The first is the traditional Roman Catholic attitude toward birth control. The second is the tension inherent in the very reason the family came to the United States: Luis brought them here for better opportunities, yet traditional expectations — especially those placed on Rolando — threaten to deny those same opportunities to the children. Personal values, however, are not transcendent, and it is not the role of the human service professional to override them.
Working with a family like the Perezes produces important professional insights. Socio-cultural views about religion and tradition become more understandable in context. Frustration about a large immigrant family drawing on community resources is tempered by recognizing that the children have the opportunity to change their own lives and contribute to others'. There also develops a respect for the unpredictable medical crises that can destabilize even the most resilient families. The Perez children — Rolando (19), Lupe (17), Anna (15), Roselina (13), Gracellia (10), Yesenia (8), Gabriella (6), and Maritza (3) — are each navigating the competing pressures of cultural assimilation and familial loyalty in different ways.
You’re 50% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.