Book Review: LBJ and Modern America by Kevin Fernlund
This paper reviews Kevin Fernlund's Lyndon B. Johnson and Modern America (2012), which frames the years 1932–1968 as the "Age of Johnson." The review evaluates Fernlund's central thesis—that Johnson's Texas roots and lifelong liberal values defined his presidency—and assesses how well the author executes that argument. The paper examines the book's chronological organization, its broad and sympathetic tone, and the ways in which Fernlund contextualizes LBJ within Cold War politics and domestic reform. While acknowledging the biography's accessibility and fresh perspective, the review also critiques its lack of critical depth and its tendency toward uncritical, sentimental characterization of Johnson and his era.
- Introduction: Fernlund's Framing of the Age of Johnson: Defines Fernlund's scope and biographical approach
- Thesis and Purpose: A New Portrait of LBJ: Texas roots and liberal ideals as Johnson's core
- Tone and Critical Limitations: Sympathetic tone obscures political complexity
- Depth of Detail and Thematic Breadth: Rich detail supports broad but shallow theme
- Organization and Chronological Approach: Straightforward chronological biography structure
- Conclusion: Fernlund's Overall Achievement: Silver-lining assessment of Johnson's legacy
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The review maintains a clear evaluative stance throughout, consistently returning to the question of whether Fernlund achieves his stated aims.
- The use of an extended metaphor — comparing Fernlund's method to a painter selecting colors and shading — gives the critique an elegant, illustrative quality that elevates the prose.
- The paper balances acknowledgment of the book's strengths (accessible detail, fresh perspective, sympathetic tone) with substantive criticism (lack of political depth, uncritical acceptance of political rhetoric), demonstrating nuanced evaluative thinking.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates effective evaluative analysis in a book review format. Rather than simply summarizing Fernlund's content, the student consistently interrogates the author's choices — assessing tone, organizational structure, thesis execution, and thematic scope — against the book's own stated purpose. This technique of holding an author accountable to their own aims, rather than to an external standard alone, is a hallmark of sophisticated academic criticism.
Structure breakdown
The review opens by situating Fernlund's framing device (the "Age of Johnson") before moving into the book's central thesis and its Texas-rooted argument. Subsequent sections examine tone and critical limitations, the adequacy of detail and thematic breadth, and the biography's chronological organization. The conclusion synthesizes the overall assessment. This progression mirrors the structure of a strong academic book review: context, thesis evaluation, methodological critique, and final judgment.
Introduction: Fernlund's Framing of the Age of Johnson
Kevin Fernlund opens his biography of Lyndon B. Johnson by defining the years 1932 to 1968 as the "Age of Johnson"1 — a designation not commonly applied to a time period stretching from the New Deal era to the height of the Cold War. From the outset, it becomes clear that Fernlund's purpose is not to rehash old material or repeat well-worn facts about LBJ, but rather to depict the man in a new light — as a figure larger than life — so that one cannot consider this era without thinking about how it reflected on him and he on it. This review examines Fernlund's aims, how well he executes his purpose, whether his treatment of the subject is too narrow, too broad, or appropriately detailed, how well the book is organized, and the qualities of the author's focus.
Thesis and Purpose: A New Portrait of LBJ
The main purpose of Fernlund's biography is to present Johnson in a fresh and compelling light. The first point Fernlund wishes to make is that LBJ became the man he was because he came from Texas.2 The region had such a profound impact on his worldview that without Texas, Johnson would not have been Johnson. He was a product of the Lone Star State more than anything else.
By emphasizing place, Fernlund attempts to fill a gap in the way history has chosen to remember the 36th president. LBJ is so often associated with two things — the assassination of Kennedy and the Vietnam War — or, if one wishes to be concise, with the Cold War. In either case, these associations belong to the world of high-stakes politics. What Fernlund does is take the reader out of that world of espionage and political maneuvering and drop him squarely into the domestic sphere of rural Texas. Fernlund describes Johnson's pedigree by tracing his ancestors, their ties to the land, and the way populism shaped their lives. This is not the typical Johnson biography: it adopts a familiar, compassionate, and domesticated perspective that disconnects the immediate present from the accumulated knowledge one has gathered about LBJ from years of secondary sources. Fernlund wipes the slate clean and begins the story anew, as though it were being told for the first time.
By tying LBJ and his family to the land and showing how politics was a natural fruit of the populism that ran through their veins, Fernlund largely succeeds in his aim to offer the reader a new LBJ — and it works. The only drawback is that this purpose does not lend itself to minute scrutiny but rather to broad generalizations and a general characterization of Johnson. Insofar as Fernlund intends to show how LBJ's liberal tendencies were present from the beginning — evinced, for example, by his joining a liberal Protestant church as a teenager in Texas rather than a conservative one3 — he makes his case. Yet he also shows how the larger world stage ultimately constrained Johnson's ability to put his liberal values to work in a globally meaningful way.
Tone and Critical Limitations
The broad topic that Fernlund gradually explores is never explicitly defined, so there is no sense of urgency or directness in what he is doing. Rather, he begins by painting in broad strokes like a painter and then fills in the details that matter to his overall thesis: that LBJ was a man from Texas with liberal ideals, and that these ideals were only imperfectly implemented throughout his career because of larger inherited problems, namely the Cold War.
The difficulty with this approach is that Fernlund's book reads as an uncritical homage to LBJ and his ideals rather than a hard-hitting examination of the president who came to power after one of the most shocking assassinations in modern history. To examine Johnson in the quaint manner Fernlund employs — coloring him in the light of FDR's "Four Freedoms" rather than in the turbulence that surrounded Kennedy's death — is to engage with the past uncritically and to rely on somewhat superficial and sentimental characterizations. The Four Freedoms were an attempt at "the strengthening of democracy," Fernlund tells the reader.4 A more critical biographer could easily frame them in very different terms. Fernlund's aim, however, is to produce a down-home, folksy appreciation of America's past and LBJ's role in shaping it. He succeeds in that aim — but not every reader will be satisfied with it. Fernlund supports his thesis by relying on "greatest age" characterizations, treating the political talking points of the past as high-minded ideals and accepting them at face value as reflective of an America that existed more in the abstract world of imagination than in reality.5
Conclusion: Fernlund's Overall Achievement
Overall, Fernlund's perspective encompasses society, events, policies, and individuals. He examines the intersectionality of America's racial issues, economic issues, and foreign and domestic policy challenges, looking at how Johnson was shaped by them and how he helped shape them in turn. Fernlund focuses on issues because issues, he asserts, were what mattered to Johnson — such as the "disproportion of poor blacks to middle class blacks" that was just one of the many problems Johnson had to confront and try to solve.11
Ultimately, Fernlund finds the silver lining of Johnson's career and brings the book to a close by describing LBJ's role in launching NASA. It is an accomplishment perfectly in line with Fernlund's aim: to make Johnson look like an inspired leader and visionary from Texas. Whether or not every reader accepts that portrait, Fernlund's biography offers an accessible, sympathetically drawn account of a president whose legacy remains fiercely debated.
Bibliography
Fernlund, Kevin. Lyndon B. Johnson and Modern America. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2012. 192 pp.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.