Macy's EFE Matrix and CPM Competitive Analysis
This paper examines Macy's strategic position through two key analytical tools: the External Factor Evaluation (EFE) matrix and the Competitive Profile Matrix (CPM). Using the EFE matrix, the paper identifies Macy's most significant external opportunities — including online shopping, technology adoption, expansion, and the Polaris plan — alongside critical threats such as supply chain risk, economic conditions, the rise of e-commerce, and the pandemic's unique challenges. The CPM analysis compares Macy's against Dillard's and Costco across critical success factors including customer loyalty, product quality, price competitiveness, customer service, and employee dedication, highlighting areas where Macy's must strengthen its strategies to maintain competitive relevance.
- Introduction to the EFE Matrix: Purpose and origins of the EFE matrix tool
- Macy's Opportunities and Strategic Priorities: Top opportunities including e-commerce and Polaris plan
- Key Threats and Strategic Responses: Major threats and recommended strategic adaptations
- Competitive Profile Matrix Analysis: CPM comparison of Macy's, Dillard's, and Costco
- Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations: Low-cost strategy and supplier contract revisions
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper applies two well-established strategic management frameworks — the EFE matrix and the CPM — directly to a real company, grounding abstract tools in concrete business context.
- It connects analytical findings to actionable strategy recommendations, such as pursuing international partnerships and renegotiating contracts with emerging apparel manufacturers.
- Citations from recognized strategic management textbooks (Amason and Godfrey) lend academic credibility to the framework introductions.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied framework analysis — using structured business tools (EFE matrix and CPM) to move from raw environmental data to prioritized strategic insights. This technique involves assigning weights and ratings to factors, interpreting the resulting scores, and translating those scores into specific strategic recommendations rather than stopping at description.
Structure breakdown
The paper is organized into two main analytical segments. The first covers the EFE matrix, explaining its purpose, identifying Macy's key opportunities and threats, interpreting the ratings, and proposing strategic adjustments. The second covers the CPM, introducing the tool, identifying critical success factors, comparing Macy's performance against Dillard's and Costco, and concluding with a recommendation to pursue a low-cost strategy to address price competitiveness weaknesses.
Introduction to the EFE Matrix
As Godfrey (2015) indicates, the relevance of the External Factor Evaluation (EFE) matrix cannot be overstated when it comes to evaluating the external environment of an enterprise and identifying both threats and opportunities. This tool, as Godfrey (2015) further notes, was first introduced in Fred R. David's book Strategic Management. In the case of Macy's EFE matrix, weights have been assigned to indicate how important each identified factor is — a necessary step given that not all factors carry the same level of significance. Knowing which factors to prioritize is essential for Macy's to succeed in its industry, and the assignment of weights serves precisely that purpose.
Macy's Opportunities and Strategic Priorities
The most important opportunities for Macy's include online shopping, technology, expansion, and its Polaris plan, all of which carry relatively high ratings. The Polaris strategy, Macy's multi-year transformation plan, represents a particularly significant internal driver of opportunity in the external landscape.
In assessing how effectively Macy's strategies exploit available opportunities, the ratings reveal one notable gap: international expansion carries the lowest rating among key opportunities. To address this, Macy's could consider pursuing strategic partnerships with multinational companies that already have a strong presence in regions the company deems promising. Such alliances could allow Macy's to enter new markets with reduced risk and greater local knowledge.
Competitive Profile Matrix Analysis
The Competitive Profile Matrix (CPM) is a key tool for comparing an enterprise to its competitors in an attempt to identify both its relative weaknesses and its relative strengths (Amason, 2011). In the case of Macy's, the CPM yields crucial insights about the company's performance relative to its rivals in the industry. The critical success factors identified in this analysis are the dimensions in which Macy's must excel if it wishes to remain relevant in the market.
The factors of greatest relevance — each with a weight of 0.10 or above — include customer loyalty, product quality, price competitiveness, customer service, and employee dedication. The ratings assigned to each factor indicate how Macy's and its two primary competitors, Dillard's and Costco, are performing on each dimension. Based on this analysis, Macy's is weakest in the areas of employee dedication and price competitiveness, which carry the lowest ratings for the company.
Looking at the weighted scores, Macy's and Costco are tied for the top score in employee dedication, while Costco holds the top position in price competitiveness. This finding suggests that Macy's should deploy targeted strategies to further enhance its price competitiveness — specifically by embracing a low-cost strategy — in order to close the gap with Costco and strengthen its overall competitive standing.
Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations
Taken together, the EFE matrix and CPM analyses point to clear strategic priorities for Macy's. On the opportunity side, the company should invest more deliberately in international expansion, potentially through multinational partnerships. On the threat side, renegotiating supplier relationships with emerging apparel manufacturers represents a pragmatic near-term defense. From a competitive standpoint, closing the price competitiveness gap with Costco through a deliberate low-cost strategy is the most pressing recommendation emerging from the CPM. Addressing these areas systematically would meaningfully enhance Macy's competitive advantage in an increasingly challenging retail environment.
References
Amason, A. (2011). Strategic Management: From Theory to Practice. New York: Routledge.
Godfrey, R. (2015). Strategic Management: A Critical Introduction. New York: Routledge.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.